OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Lightwave Technology

Journal of Lightwave Technology


  • Vol. 16, Iss. 4 — Apr. 1, 1998
  • pp: 490–

Weakly Versus Strongly Multihop Space-Division Optical Networks

Alberto Bononi

Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 16, Issue 4, pp. 490- (1998)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (420 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

  • Export Citation/Save Click for help


Transparent multihop optical networks suffer from the accumulation from node to node of crosstalk and amplified spontaneous emission noise, which may severely degrade the quality of received signals. It is thus important to keep the number of intermediate hops as low as possible. This paper compares two single-wavelength cell-switching space-division optical networks that employ deflection routing. The first has a well-known Manhattan Street (MS) distributed topology. The mean internodal distance of this network is approximately the square root of the number of nodes. We term this network as strongly multihop. The second has a centralized star topology: the star is a multistage space-division photonic switch with limited buffers. Deflected cells delivered to the wrong user are transparently rerouted to the star. This network is intrinsically single-hop and gradually becomes multihop because of deflections. We term this network as weakly multihop. As the carried traffic increases, the link load increases much more rapidly in the strongly multihop topology, and so do both the crosstalk level per hop and the number of hops caused by deflections. For the same carried traffic, the accumulated crosstalk and spontaneous emission levels in a well-designed star-based network are much lower than in a strongly multihop network. Hence, lower packet error rates and lower delay jitter are expected for the centralized network. Moreover, for both networks, a simple frequency sweeping technique is shown to substantially reduce the dominant signal-crosstalk beat, thus allowing network operation with switch crosstalk factors as low as {-}20 dB.


Alberto Bononi, "Weakly Versus Strongly Multihop Space-Division Optical Networks," J. Lightwave Technol. 16, 490- (1998)

Sort:  Journal  |  Reset


  1. O. K. Tonguz and L. G. Kazovsky, "Theory of direct-detection lightwave receivers using optical amplifiers," J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 9, pp. 174-181, Feb. 1991.
  2. O. K. Tonguz and K. A. Falcone, "Fiber-optic interconnection of local area networks: Physical limitations of topologies," J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 11, pp. 1040-1052, May/June 1993.
  3. N. A. Olsson, "Lightwave systems with optical amplifiers," J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 7, pp. 1071-1082, July 1989.
  4. P. A. Humblet and M. Azizoglu, "On the bit error rate of lightwave systems with optical amplifiers," J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 9, pp. 1576-1582, Nov. 1991.
  5. R. R. Ramaswami and P. A. Humblet, "Amplifier induced crosstalk in multichannel optical networks," J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 8, pp. 1882-1896, Dec. 1990.
  6. E. Almstrom, C. P. Larsen, L. Gillner, W. H. van Berlo, M. Gustavsson, and E. Berglind, "Experimental and analytical evaluation of packaged 4\;\times\;4 InGaAsP/InP semiconductor optical amplifier gate switch matrices for optical networks," J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 14, pp. 996-1004, June 1996.

Cited By

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited