OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Lightwave Technology

Journal of Lightwave Technology

| A JOINT IEEE/OSA PUBLICATION

  • Vol. 31, Iss. 11 — Jun. 1, 2013
  • pp: 1828–1834

Reach-Related Energy Consumption in IP-Over-WDM 100G Translucent Networks

Giuseppe Rizzelli, Annalisa Morea, Massimo Tornatore, and Achille Pattavina

Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 31, Issue 11, pp. 1828-1834 (2013)


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1030 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations
  • Export Citation/Save Click for help

Abstract

The quest of extended optical reach has been one of the major drivers for the transmission systems research field. Since extending the optical reach does not come for free and that reducing the power consumption has become a mandatory task for network designers, we investigate IP-over-WDM network power consumption as a function of 100 Gb/s Transponders' (TXP) transmission reach.In order to achieve this target, we propose a novel analytical model that captures the increase of TXP power consumption versus its optical reach. Network design is performed via a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) optimization engine. We have used two Multi-Layer design strategies, the Bypass (Bp) and the Direct-Bypass (DBp), that we have both applied to the “All-On” and the “On-Off” planning approaches: the former considers that transmission devices are always on and provides an upper bound to the network power consumption whereas the latter maximizes power savings by switching network devices On-Off according to daily traffic variations. Finally, simulations on a European-like backbone network show that there exists an optical reach that leads to a minimum network power consumption, the so-called optimal reach. By performing network design at the optimal reach we can achieve up to 36% and 37% of energy savings with respect to an extended reach-based design in the All-On and in the On-Off planning respectively.

© 2013 IEEE

Citation
Giuseppe Rizzelli, Annalisa Morea, Massimo Tornatore, and Achille Pattavina, "Reach-Related Energy Consumption in IP-Over-WDM 100G Translucent Networks," J. Lightwave Technol. 31, 1828-1834 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/jlt/abstract.cfm?URI=jlt-31-11-1828


Sort:  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. S. K. Korotky, "Traffic trends: Drivers and measures of cost-effective and energy-efficient technologies and architectures for backbone optical networks," Proc. OFC 2012 .
  2. J. Renaudier, O. Bertran-Pardo, M. Salsi, H. Mardoyan, P. Tran, G. Charlet, S. Bigo, "Will 100 Gb/s resist higher bit-rates?," Proc. ECOC 2011 .
  3. G. Shen, R. S. Tucker, "Energy-minimized design for IP over WDM network," IEEE/OSA Opt. Commun. Netw. 1, 176-186 (2009).
  4. A. N. Patel, C. Gao, J. P. Jue, X. Wang, Q. Zhang, P. Palacharla, T. Naito, "Traffic grooming and regenerator placement in impairment-aware optical WDM networks," Proc. ONDM 2010 .
  5. Y. Zhang, P. Chowdhury, M. Tornatore, B. Mukherjee, "Energy efficiency in telecom optical networks," IEEE Commun. Surveys Tutor. 12, 441-458 (2010).
  6. http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2009/08/what-europeans-do-at-night/ ARBOR Networks.
  7. J. M. Simmons, "On determining the optimal optical reach for a long-haul network," J. Lightw. Technol. 23, 1039-1048 (2005).
  8. N. Naas, B. Kantarci, H. T. Mouftah, "Power and cost reduction in optical transport networks by multi-granular switching with optical reach consideration," Proc. QBSC 2012 pp. .
  9. G. Rizzelli, A. Morea, C. Dorize, O. Rival, M. Tornatore, "On the energy impact of transmission reach for 100G IP-over-WDM translucent optical networks," Proc. ECOC 2012 .
  10. G. Rizzelli, A. Morea, M. Tornatore, O. Rival, "Energy efficient traffic-aware design of on-off multi-layer translucent networks," Elsevier Comput. Netw. 56, 2443-2455 (2012).
  11. W. V. Heddeghem, F. Idzikowski, W. Vereecken, D. Colle, M. Pickavet, P. Demeester, "Power consumption modeling in optical multilayer networks," Photonics Netwo. Commun. (2012) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11107-011-0370-7.
  12. A. Morea, S. Spadaro, O. Rival, J. Perello, F. Agraz, D. Verchere, "Power management of optoelectronic interfaces for dynamic optical networks," Proc. ECOC 2011 .
  13. M. S. Savasini, P. Monti, M. Tacca, A. Fumagalli, H. Waldman, "Regenerator placement with guaranteed connectivity in optical networks," Proc. ONDM 2007 pp. 438-447.
  14. D. Truong, W. Cheng, T. Mohsenin, Z. Yu, T. Jacobson, G. Landge, M. Meeuwsen, C. Watnik, P. Mejia, A. Tran, J. Webb, E. Work, Z. Xiao, B. Baas, "A 167-processor 65 nm computational platform with per-processor dynamic supply voltage and dynamic clock frequency scaling," Proc. IEEE Symp. VLSI Circuits (2008) pp. 22-23.
  15. A. P. Chandrakasan, S. Sheng, R. W. Broadersen, "Low-power CMOS digital design," J. Solid-State Circuits 27, 473-484 (1992).
  16. H. Onaka, "Challenges for VLSI implementation of 100G digital coherent receivers," Proc. Workshop “DSP and FEC Towards the Shannon Limit” ECOC 2009 .
  17. B. Spinler, "Equalizer design complexity for digital coherent receivers," J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electroni. 16, 1180-1192 (2010).

Cited By

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited