OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

  • Editors: K. Bergman and V. Chan
  • Vol. 2, Iss. 10 — Oct. 1, 2010
  • pp: 782–792

Delay-Bandwidth-Aware Metric Abstraction Schemes for OIF E-NNI Multidomain Traffic Engineering

Francesco Paolucci, Filippo Cugini, Paola Iovanna, Giulio Bottari, Luca Valcarenghi, and Piero Castoldi  »View Author Affiliations


Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 2, Issue 10, pp. 782-792 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.2.000782


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (496 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Multidomain traffic engineering (TE) has the potential not only of guaranteeing the quality of service (QoS) to connections spanning multiple domains but also of effectively utilizing intradomain resources. The hierarchical Optical Internetworking Forum (OIF) External Network-to-Network Interface (E-NNI) control plane platform has emerged as a promising candidate aiming at guaranteeing multidomain QoS provisioning. Recent efforts have been made to extend OIF E-NNI in the multicarrier scenario. However, open issues such as confidentiality, the choice of TE metric, the routing controller (RC) architecture, the path computation method, and the abstraction schemes responsible for selecting the appropriate value of the TE metric to be announced have not been addressed yet. In this study, what we believe to be a novel RC architecture integrating the path computation element (PCE) is proposed to enable the efficient provisioning of end-to-end QoS-guaranteed services. The key role of the TE metric is analyzed and discussed, together with different TE metric abstraction schemes. The end-to-end delay is here considered as the most suitable candidate and a novel family of such schemes, named delay-bandwidth aware (DBA), are proposed and evaluated by means of simulations. Results show the ability of such schemes to globally preserve control plane stability and network resource utilization while advertising a high service level.

© 2010 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(060.4250) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks
(060.4256) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks, network optimization

ToC Category:
Research Papers

History
Original Manuscript: March 16, 2010
Revised Manuscript: August 3, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: August 5, 2010
Published: September 13, 2010

Citation
Francesco Paolucci, Filippo Cugini, Paola Iovanna, Giulio Bottari, Luca Valcarenghi, and Piero Castoldi, "Delay-Bandwidth-Aware Metric Abstraction Schemes for OIF E-NNI Multidomain Traffic Engineering," J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 2, 782-792 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/jocn/abstract.cfm?URI=jocn-2-10-782


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. F. Paolucci, F. Cugini, A. Giorgetti, L. Valcarenghi, P. Castoldi, P. Iovanna, G. Bottari, A. Welin, “PCE architecture for OIF E-NNI multi-domain routing evaluated in an intra-domain WSON scenario,” in 35th European Conf. on Optical Communication, 2009.
  2. F. Paolucci, F. Cugini, P. Iovanna, G. Bottari, P. Castoldi, “Delay-based bandwidth-aware abstraction scheme for OIF E-NNI multi-domain routing,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conf. and Expo. and the Nat. Fiber Optic Engineers Conf., 2010, paper NTuA4.
  3. F. Aslam, Z. Uzmi, A. Farrel, “Interdomain path computation: challenges and solutions for label switched networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 94–101, 2007. [CrossRef]
  4. M. P. Howarth, M. Boucadair, P. Flegkas, N. Wang, G. Pavlou, P. Morand, T. Coadic, D. Griffin, A. Asgari, P. Georgatsos, “End-to-end quality of service provisioning through inter-provider traffic engineering,” Comput. Commun., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 683–702, 2006. [CrossRef]
  5. A. Manolova, S. Ruepp, L. Dittmann, “TE-enhanced path selection for QoS provisioning in multi-domain GMPLS networks,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conf. and Expo. and the Nat. Fiber Optic Engineers Conf., 2009, paper JThA69.
  6. D. Katz, K. Kompella, D. Yeung, “Traffic Engineering (TE) Extensions to OSPF Version 2,” IETF, RFC 3630, 2003.
  7. Y. Rekhter, T. Li, “A border gateway protocol 4 (BGP-4),” IETF, RFC 1771, 1995.
  8. N. Djarallah, H. Pouyllau, “Algorithms for SLA composition to provide inter-domain services,” in Int. Symp. on Integrated Network Management, 2009, pp. 460–467.
  9. J. Vasseur, R. Zhang, N. Bitar, J. Le Roux, “A backward-recursive PCE-based computation (BRPC) procedure to compute shortest constrained inter-domain traffic engineering label switched paths,” IETF, RFC 5441, 2009.
  10. R. Douville, J.-L. Le Roux, J.-L. Rougier, S. Secci, “A service plane over the PCE architecture for automatic multidomain connection-oriented services,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 94–102, 2008. [CrossRef]
  11. External Network-Network Interface (E-NNI) OSPF-Based Routing—1.0 (Intra-Carrier) Implementation Agreement. Optical Internetworking Forum, 2007.
  12. S. Okamoto, H. Otsuki, T. Otani, “Multi-ASON and GMPLS network domain interworking challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 88–93, 2008. [CrossRef]
  13. D. King, A. Farrel, “The application of the path computation element architecture to the determination of a sequence of domains in MPLS & GMPLS,” IETF, PCE WG, 2010.
  14. N. Ghani, Q. Liu, D. Benhaddou, N. Rao, T. Lehman, “Control plane design in multidomain/multilayer optical networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 78–87, 2008. [CrossRef]
  15. A. Farrel, J. P. Vasseur, J. Ash, “A path computation element (PCE)-based architecture,” IETF, RFC 4655, 2006.
  16. S. Uludag, K.-S. Lui, K. Nahrstedt, G. Brewster, “Analysis of topology aggregation techniques for QoS routing,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 7, 2007. [CrossRef]
  17. D. Bauer, J. N. Daigle, I. Iliadis, P. Scotton, “Topology aggregation for combined additive and restrictive metrics,” Comput. Netw., vol. 50, no. 17, pp. 3284–3299, 2006. [CrossRef]
  18. M. Chamania, A. Jukan, “A survey of inter-domain peering and provisioning solutions for the next generation optical networks,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 33–51, 2009. [CrossRef]
  19. Q. Liu, M. A. Kök, N. Ghani, A. Gumaste, “Hierarchical routing in multi-domain optical networks,” Comput. Commun., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 122–131, 2006. [CrossRef]
  20. G. Maier, C. Busca, A. Pattavina, “Multi-domain routing techniques with topology aggregation in ASON networks,” in Int. Conf. on Optical Network Design and Modeling, 2008.
  21. A. Mehaoua, T. Ahmed, H. Asgari, M. Sidibe, A. Nafaa, G. Kor-mentzas, T. Kortis, C. Skianis, “Service-driven inter-domain QoS monitoring system for large-scale IP and DVB networks,” Comput. Commun., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1687–1695, 2006. [CrossRef]
  22. G. Almes, S. Kalidindi, M. Zekauskas, “A one-way delay metric for IPPM,” IETF, RFC 2679, 1999.
  23. P. Giacomazzi, G. Saddemi, “End-to-end delay approximation in cascades of generalized processor sharing schedulers,” in Int. Conf. on Communications, 2009.
  24. K. Kompella, G. Swallow, “Detecting multi-protocol label switched (MPLS) data-plane failures,” IETF, RFC 4379, 2006.
  25. J. Vasseur, J. Le Roux, “Path computation element (PCE) communication protocol (PCEP),” IETF, RFC 5440, 2009.
  26. Y. Lee, G. Bernstein, D. Li, G. Martinelli, “A framework for the control of wavelength switched optical networks (WSON) with impairments,” IETF, CCAMP WG, 2010.
  27. N. Bithar, R. Zhang, K. Kumaki, “Inter-AS requirements for the path computation element communication protocol (PCECP),” IETF, RFC 5376, 2008.
  28. R. Bradford, J.-P. Vasseur, A. Farrel, “Preserving topology confidentiality in inter-domain path computation using a key-based mechanism,” IETF, RFC 5520, 2009.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited