OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

  • Editors: K. Bergman and V. Chan
  • Vol. 2, Iss. 7 — Jul. 1, 2010
  • pp: 427–441

GMPLS-based Multidomain Restoration: Analysis, Strategies, Policies and Experimental Assessment

L. Velasco, F. Agraz, R. Martínez, R. Casellas, S. Spadaro, R. Muñoz, and G. Junyent  »View Author Affiliations

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 2, Issue 7, pp. 427-441 (2010)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (828 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



A connection spanning, for example, several countries crosses multiple optical backbone networks, each one controlled by different administrators or operators. In this context, the interworking of these networks is thus necessary to set up end-to-end optical connections. A key issue when delivering such optical services is the use of efficient and fast restoration strategies to recover a connection disruption. To this end, there are several issues and policies that a network operator should address, such as interdomain failure information exchange and the point of repair (PoR) placement problem. Upon a failure’s occurrence, exchanging interdomain failure information results is essential to attain both an efficient use of the network resources (i.e., wavelength channels) and a fast restoration time. In this regard, within the GMPLS (Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching) framework, interdomain information exchange remains unstandardized. Three network operator policies are proposed to yield different restoration mechanisms according to different interdomain failure exchanges. Additionally, three PoR strategies are pointed out and are qualitatively compared. Finally, selected policies and restoration strategies are experimentally validated and compared in terms of the restoration time. Experiments have been carried out over a multidomain optical network infrastructure connecting the GMPLS-based control planes of the UPC CARISMA and the CTTC ADRENALINE test beds.

© 2010 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(060.1155) Fiber optics and optical communications : All-optical networks
(060.4261) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks, protection and restoration

ToC Category:
Research Papers

Original Manuscript: February 12, 2010
Revised Manuscript: April 24, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: May 21, 2010
Published: June 23, 2010

L. Velasco, F. Agraz, R. Martínez, R. Casellas, S. Spadaro, R. Muñoz, and G. Junyent, "GMPLS-based Multidomain Restoration: Analysis, Strategies, Policies and Experimental Assessment," J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 2, 427-441 (2010)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. ITU-T Recommendation G.8080/Y.1304, “Architecture for the automatically switched optical network (ASON),” ITU-Telecommunication Standardization Sector, Nov. 2001, and Amendment 1, Mar. 2003, http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/recommendations/index.aspx?ser=G.
  2. E. Mannie, ed., ““Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) architecture,” IETF Network Working Group RFC-3945, Oct. 2004, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3945.txt.
  3. L. Berger, ed., “Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Resource Reservation Protocol-traffic engineering (RSVP-TE) extensions,” IETF Network Working Group RFC-3473, Jan. 2003, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3473.txt.
  4. D. Katz, K. Kompella, and D. Yeung, eds., “Traffic engineering (TE) extensions to OSPF version 2,” IETF Network Working Group RFC-3630, Sept. 2003, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3630.txt.
  5. J. Lang, ed., “Link Management Protocol (LMP),” IETF Network Working Group RFC-4204, Oct. 2005, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4204.txt.
  6. J. P. Lang, Y. Rekhter, D. Papadimitriou, “RSVP-TE extensions in support of end-to-end Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) recovery,” IETF Network Working Group RFC-4872, May 2007, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4872.txt.
  7. L. Berger, I. Bryskin, D. Papadimitriou, and A. Farrel, eds., “GMPLS segment recovery,” IETF Network Working Group RFC-4873, May 2007, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4873.txt.
  8. W. D. Grover, Mesh-Based Survivable Networks,” Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2004.
  9. L. Velasco, S. Spadaro, J. Comellas, G. Junyent, “Introducing OMS protection in GMPLS-based optical ring networks,” Comp. Netw., vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 1975–1987, July 2008. [CrossRef]
  10. L. Velasco, S. Spadaro, J. Comellas, G. Junyent, “Shared-path protection with extra traffic in ASON-GMPLS ring networks,” J. Opt. Netw., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 130–145, Feb. 2009. [CrossRef]
  11. T. Takeda, A. Farrel, Y. Ikejiri, and J. P. Vasseur, eds., “Analysis of inter-domain label switched path (LSP) recovery,” IETF Network Working Group RFC-5298, Aug. 2008, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5298.txt.
  12. L. Guo, “LSSP: a novel local segment-shared protection for multi-domain optical mesh networks,” Comput. Commun., vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1794–1801, June 2007. [CrossRef]
  13. D. Troung, B. Jaumard, “Using topology aggregation for efficient shared segment protection solutions in multi-domain networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 96–107, Dec. 2007.
  14. J. Szigeti, R. Romeral, T. Cinkler, D. Larrabeiti, “p-Cycle protection in multidomain optical networks,” Photonic Netw. Commun., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 35–47, Feb. 2009. [CrossRef]
  15. H. Huang, J. Copeland, “Multi-domain mesh optical network protection using Hamiltonian cycles,” in HPSR 2002. Workshop on High Performance Switching and Routing. Merging Optical and IP Technologies, Kobe, Japan, 2002, pp. 26–29.
  16. L. Guo, X. Wang, J. Cao, W. Hou, J. Wu, Y. Li, “Local and global Hamiltonian cycle protection algorithm based on abstracted virtual topology in fault-tolerant multi-domain optical networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 851–859, Mar. 2010. [CrossRef]
  17. C. Y. Lee, A. Farrel, S. De Cnodder, “Exclude routes—extension to Resource Reservation Protocol-traffic engineering (RSVP-TE),” IETF Network Working Group RFC-4874, Apr. 2007, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4874.txt.
  18. JDSU, http://www.jdsu.com.
  19. J. Perelló, L. Velasco, F. Agraz, S. Spadaro, G. Junyent, J. Comellas, “A comparison of in-fiber and out-of-fiber GMPLS-based control plane configurations: benefits, drawbacks and solutions,” in 10th Anniversary Int. Conf. on Transparent Optical Networks 2008. ICTON 2008, Athens, 2008, vol. 3, pp. 101–104.
  20. F. Zhang, Y. Lee, J. Han, G. Bernstein, “OSPF extensions in support of routing and wavelength assignment (RWA) in wavelength switched optical networks (WSONs),” IETF Network Work Group Internet draft, Mar. 5, 2010 (expires Sept. 4, 2010), http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-rwa-wson-routing-ospf-03.
  21. R. Muñoz, R. Martínez, R. Casellas, “Challenges for GMPLS lightpath provisioning in transparent optical networks: wavelength constraints in routing and signaling,” IEEE Commun. Mag, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 26–34, Aug. 2009.
  22. F. Agraz, L. Velasco, J. Perelló, M. Ruiz, S. Spadaro, G. Junyent, J. Comellas, “Design and implementation of a GMPLS-controlled grooming-capable optical transport network,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. A258–A269, July 2009. [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited