OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

  • Editors: K. Bergman and V. Chan
  • Vol. 2, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 2010
  • pp: 609–624

Optical IP Switching: A Flow-Based Approach to Distributed Cross-Layer Provisioning

Marco Ruffini, Donal O’Mahony, and Linda Doyle  »View Author Affiliations


Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 2, Issue 8, pp. 609-624 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.2.000609


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1154 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Technological improvements, such as erbium-doped fiber amplifiers (EDFAs) and wavelength division multiplexing (WDM), have revolutionized optical transmission, boosting the development and worldwide deployment of the Internet. Similar progress has not yet impacted the routing layer, as current IP routing technology struggles to deliver the necessary bandwidth at competitive costs. Hybrid electro-optical architectures, where dynamical optical circuit switching is combined with legacy packet routing, have been introduced in the past few years as promising solutions to reduce costs at the IP layer and to deliver new revenue-generating services and applications. Most of the architectures currently proposed have focused on end-to-end lightpath provisioning, coordinated through a centralized management plane. In this paper we propose optical IP switching (OIS), a hybrid electro-optical network architecture that combines IP routing and wavelength switching, using a distributed decision-making process. We report technical and economic analysis, based on simulations obtained through real traffic traces and routing tables, that compare our distributed model to an opaque IP-over-WDM and centralized, transparent overlay models. We also report testbed results that analyze the effect of dynamic transparent switching operation on the TCP and UDP transport protocols. The results obtained show that distributed provisioning based on local traffic analysis can be feasible, although more work is required to evaluate the efficacy of optimization techniques on distributed network models.

© 2010 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(060.4250) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks
(060.4253) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks, circuit-switched

ToC Category:
Research Papers

History
Original Manuscript: September 30, 2009
Revised Manuscript: April 29, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: June 19, 2010
Published: July 27, 2010

Citation
Marco Ruffini, Donal O’Mahony, and Linda Doyle, "Optical IP Switching: A Flow-Based Approach to Distributed Cross-Layer Provisioning," J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 2, 609-624 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/jocn/abstract.cfm?URI=jocn-2-8-609


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. M. Ruffini, D. O’Mahony, and L. Doyle, “Optical IP switching for dynamic traffic engineering in next-generation optical networks,” in Proc. of the Optical Network Design and Modeling Conf., 2007, pp. 309–318.
  2. M. Ruffini, D. O’Mahony, and L. Doyle, “Feasibility of flow-based optical provisioning in GEANT,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conf. and Expo. and the Nat. Fiber Optic Engineers Conf., 2007, paper OWK3.
  3. G. L. Jones, W. Forysiak, and J. H. B. Nijhof, “Economic benefits of all-optical cross connects and multi-haul DWDM systems for European national networks,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conf., 2004, paper WH2.
  4. P. Ferreira, W. Lehr, and L. McKnight, “Optical networks and the future of broadband services,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change , vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 741–758, 2002. [CrossRef]
  5. D. Saha, B. Rajagopalan, and G. Bernstein, “The optical network control plane: state of the standards and deployment,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 41, no. 8, pp. S29–S34, 2003. [CrossRef]
  6. J. D. Jones, L. Ong, and M. A. Lazer, “Creating an intelligent optical network worldwide interoperability demonstration,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 42, no. 11, pp. S4–S11, 2004. [CrossRef]
  7. E. Oki, K. Shiomoto, D. Shimazaki, N. Yamanaka, W. Imajuku, and Y. Takigawa, “Dynamic multilayer routing schemes in GMPLS-based IP+Optical networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 108–114, 2005. [CrossRef]
  8. K. Shiomoto, E. Oki, W. Imajuku, S. Okamoto, and N. Yamanaka, “Distributed virtual network topology control mechanism in GMPLS-based multiregion networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1254–1262, 2003. [CrossRef]
  9. G. Weichenberg, V. Chan, and M. Medard, “On the throughput-cost tradeoff of multi-tiered optical network architectures,” in Proc. of IEEE GLOBECOM, 2006, pp. 1–6.
  10. T. Lehman, J. Sobieski, and B. Jabbari, “DRAGON: a framework for service provisioning in heterogeneous grid networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 84–90, 2006. [CrossRef]
  11. P. Szegedi, Z. Lakatos, and J. Spath, “Signaling architectures and recovery time scaling for grid applications in IST project MUPBED,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 74–82, 2006. [CrossRef]
  12. N. Taesombut, F. Uyeda, A. A. Chien, L. Smarr, T. A. DeFanti, P. Padopoulos, J. Leigh, M. Ellisman, and J. Orcutt, “The OptIPuter: high-performance, QoS-guaranteed network service for emerging e-science applications,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 38–45, 2006. [CrossRef]
  13. O. Gerstel, “IP and optical integration in dynamic networks,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conf., 2009, paper OML7.
  14. P. Newman, G. Minshall, and T. L. Lyon, “IP switching-ATM under IP,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. , vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 117–129, 1998. [CrossRef]
  15. T. Dietz, F. Dressler, G. Carle, B. Claise, and P. Aitken, “Information model for packet sampling exports,” IETF RFC, Mar. 2009.
  16. K. Papagiannaki, N. Taft, S. Bhattacharya, P. Thiran, K. Salamatian, and C. Diot, “On the feasibility of identifying elephants in Internet backbone traffic,” Sprint ATL, Sprint Labs, 2001.
  17. L. G. Roberts, “The next generation of IP-flow routing,” in Proc. of SSGRR Int. Conf., 2003.
  18. M. Ruffini, “Optical IP switching,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Dublin, Trinity College, 2008.
  19. B. Quoitin and S. Uhlig, “Modeling the routing of an autonomous system with C-BGP,” IEEE Networks , vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 12–19, 2005. [CrossRef]
  20. M. Gunkel, R. Leppla, M. Wade, A. Lord, D. Schupke, G. Lehmann, C. Furst, S. Bodamer, B. Bollenz, H. Haustein, H. Nakajima, and J. Martensson, “A cost model for the WDM layer,” in Proc. of Photonics in Switching Conf., 2006.
  21. M. Ruffini, D. Kilpler, D. O’Mahony, and L. Doyle, “Cost study of dynamically transparent networks,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conf. and Expo. and the Nat. Fiber Optic Engineers Conf., 2008, paper OMG2.
  22. D. B. Payne and R. P. Davey, “The future of fibre access systems,” BT Technol. J. , vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 104–114, Oct. 2002. [CrossRef]
  23. A. Sánchez, S. Figuerola, G. Junyent, E. Kenny, V. Reijs, and M. Ruffini, “A user provisioning tool for EoMPLS services based on UCLPv1.5,” in Proc. of the TERENA Networking Conf., 2007.
  24. E. Kohler, “The click modular router,” Ph.D. thesis, MIT, 2000.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited