OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

  • Editors: K. Bergman and O. Gerstel
  • Vol. 4, Iss. 12 — Dec. 1, 2012
  • pp: 1018–1025

Energy-Efficient and Cost-Efficient Capacity Upgrade in Mixed-Line-Rate Optical Networks

Avishek Nag, Massimo Tornatore, and Biswanath Mukherjee  »View Author Affiliations

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 4, Issue 12, pp. 1018-1025 (2012)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (988 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Traffic in telecom networks is increasing rapidly, and it has been a challenging task to plan and upgrade network capacities for this increasing traffic, keeping the cost of resources within a targeted budget. Besides handling this drastic growth in traffic, future optical networks are also expected to be increasingly heterogeneous with respect to services supported and underlying technologies employed. To support this heterogeneous volume of traffic, mixed-line-rate (MLR) optical networks with line rates of 10, 40, and 100 Gbps have been shown to be effective. In the case of a greenfield network design, i.e., when planning capacities for a new network, MLR networks have been shown to be cost efficient as well as energy efficient in some recent studies. The concept of an MLR network is evolutionary, starting from a 10G single-line-rate network to a coexistence of multiple line rates in the same network as capacities on some links are periodically upgraded from 10G per wavelength to 40G and 100G per wavelength with traffic growth. Therefore, from a network-upgrade perspective, an important issue is to devise a cost-optimized migration strategy from 10G to 40G to 100G and beyond, given a traffic growth model. However, energy consumption in different elements in the network, especially in those elements whose energy consumption depends on the bandwidth of the traffic that they are handling, is also an important parameter to consider. Therefore, the ultimate question is: Can an MLR be a good candidate for energy-efficient and cost-efficient upgrade? In this study, we investigate the energy-efficient and cost-efficient MLR network-upgrade problem. In this context, we also study the effect of network connection disruption on energy-efficient and cost-efficient MLR network upgrade. In general, the service provider’s aim would be to have as few disruptions as possible during capacity upgrade, as disruptions may induce service degradation. Our results show that the amount of disruptions has a conflicting effect on energy-efficient and cost-efficient upgrade in MLR networks, and we develop an optimized upgrade strategy so that both cost and energy are kept within a certain limit.

© 2012 OSA

OCIS Codes
(060.4251) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks, assignment and routing algorithms
(060.4256) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks, network optimization

ToC Category:
Research Papers

Original Manuscript: July 6, 2012
Revised Manuscript: September 13, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: October 9, 2012
Published: November 22, 2012

Avishek Nag, Massimo Tornatore, and Biswanath Mukherjee, "Energy-Efficient and Cost-Efficient Capacity Upgrade in Mixed-Line-Rate Optical Networks," J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 4, 1018-1025 (2012)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. A. Nag, M. Tornatore, and B. Mukherjee, “Optical network design with mixed line rates and multiple modulation formats,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 466–475, Feb.2010. [CrossRef]
  2. P. Chowdhury, M. Tornatore, A. Nag, E. Ip, T. Wang, and B. Mukherjee, “On the design of energy-efficient mixed-line-rate (MLR) optical networks,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 130–139, Jan.2012. [CrossRef]
  3. C. Meusburger, D. Schupke, and A. Lord, “Optimizing the migration of channels with higher bitrates,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 608–615, Feb.2010. [CrossRef]
  4. M. De Andrade, M. Tornatore, S. Sallent, and B. Mukherjee, “Optimizing the migration to future-generation passive optical networks (PON),” IEEE Syst. J., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 413–423, Dec.2010. [CrossRef]
  5. A. Klekamp, U. Gebhard, and F. Ilchmann, “Energy and cost efficiency of adaptive and mixed-line-rate IP over DWDM networks,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 215–221, Jan.2012. [CrossRef]
  6. C. Meusburger, D. A. Schupke, and J. Eberspcher, “Multiperiod planning for optical networks—approaches based on cost optimization and limited budget,” in Proc. ICC, Beijing, May 2008.
  7. N. Geary, A. Antonopoulos, E. Drakopoulos, and J. O’Reilly, “Analysis of optimization issues in multi-period DWDM network planning,” in Proc. INFOCOM, 2001, pp. 152–158.
  8. F. Idzikowski, “Power consumption of network elements in IP over WDM networks,” Tech. Rep., TU Berlin, Germany, July2009.
  9. Transmode TM-series data sheet, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.transmode.com/.
  10. R. Saunders, G. Nicholl, K. Wellenweber, and T. Schmidt, “Can 100 Gb/s wavelengths be deployed using 10 Gb/s engineering rules?” Proc. SPIE, vol. 6774, 67740B, 2007.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited