OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

  • Editors: K. Bergman and O. Gerstel
  • Vol. 4, Iss. 12 — Dec. 1, 2012
  • pp: 978–988

Enhanced DBA to Provide QoS to Coexistent EPON and 10G-EPON Networks

Paola Garfias, Lluís Gutiérrez, and Sebastià Sallent  »View Author Affiliations

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 4, Issue 12, pp. 978-988 (2012)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1111 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The evolution of the Ethernet passive optical network (EPON) to the enhanced 10G-EPON standard looks poised to maintain its position as the leading fiber to the home technology worldwide. Fair bandwidth allocation will be a challenge in the near future in plants where 1G and 10G customer premises equipment coexists. In this paper we propose a distributed algorithm, distributed dynamic scheduling for EPON (DDSPON), to dynamically allocate the bandwidth requested by the user equipment with quality of service (QoS) constraints. The proposed algorithm is scalable and simple to re-configure, which facilitates a smoother transition from legacy 1G to 10G networks. By using the DDSPON, enhanced optical network units (ONUs) will take full advantage of the 10 Gb/s rate while legacy 1G ONUs maintain their service level agreement; as a result, the individual performance is maximized for both groups of ONUs. We also present an analytical model to evaluate the algorithm performance in a coexistent 1G/10G network. Finally, we also illustrate the enhancement of the DDSPON to provision the QoS to different services under the DiffServ architecture. Analysis and simulation results validate the effectiveness of the proposed mechanisms.

© 2012 OSA

OCIS Codes
(060.4250) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks
(060.4251) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks, assignment and routing algorithms

ToC Category:
Research Papers

Original Manuscript: May 29, 2012
Revised Manuscript: October 7, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: October 8, 2012
Published: November 19, 2012

Paola Garfias, Lluís Gutiérrez, and Sebastià Sallent, "Enhanced DBA to Provide QoS to Coexistent EPON and 10G-EPON Networks," J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 4, 978-988 (2012)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. S. A. Malik, “10G EPON—Unleashing the bandwidth potential,” White Paper, ZTE, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.telecomasia.net/pdf/ZTE/ZTE_101909.pdf.
  2. E. Keith, “EPON remains the leading FTTH technology, but for how long?” Market Advisory Report, Current Analysis, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.currentanalysis.com/f/2011/epon-ftth/.
  3. J. Chen, B. Chen, and L. Wosinska, “Joint bandwidth scheduling to support differentiated services and multiple service providers in 1G and 10G EPONS,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 343–351, Sept.2009. [CrossRef]
  4. Q. Li, H. Li, and Y.-F. Ji, “Flexible scheduling ensuring inter-ONU-group fairness in 1G/10G EPON coexistence system,” J. China Univ. Posts Telecommun., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 16–22, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/.
  5. M. Tanaka, M. Takemoto, A. Takahashi, and K. Shimokasa, “Dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithm with fairness in 1G/10G coexistence EPON system,” IEICE Trans. Commun., vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 819–827, 2009. [CrossRef]
  6. M. De Andrade, L. Gutierrez, and S. Sallent, “DDSPON: A distributed dynamic scheduling for EPON,” in IEEE Int. Conf. on Signal Processing and Communications (ICSPC), Nov. 2007, pp. 840–843.
  7. I. 802.3ah, “IEEE Standard for Information Technology. ‘Ethernet in the First Mile’,” IEEE Std 802.3ak-2004 (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.3-2002 as amended by IEEE Stds 802.3ae-2002, 802.3af-2003 and 802.3aj-2003), 2004.
  8. I. 802.3av, “IEEE Standard for Information Technology. ‘Ethernet in the First Mile’,” IEEE Std 802.3ak-2004 (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.3-2002 as amended by IEEE Stds 802.3ae-2002, 802.3af-2003 and 802.3aj-2003), 2009.
  9. M. Mcgarry, M. Reisslein, and M. Maier, “Ethernet passive optical network architectures and dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithms,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 46–60, 2008. [CrossRef]
  10. J. Zheng and H. Mouftah, “A survey of dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithms for Ethernet passive optical networks,” Opt. Switching Netw., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 151–162, 2009. [CrossRef]
  11. G. Kramer, B. Mukherjee, and G. Pesavento, “Interleaved polling with adaptive cycle time (IPACT): A dynamic bandwidth distribution scheme in an optical access network,” Photonic Network Commun., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 89–107, 2002. [CrossRef]
  12. C. Park, D. Han, and K. Rim, “Packet delay analysis of symmetric gated polling system for DBA scheme in an EPON,” Telecommun. Syst., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 13–34, 2005. [CrossRef]
  13. S. Bhatia, D. Garbuzov, and R. Bartos, “Analysis of the gated IPACT scheme for EPONs,” in IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications (ICC), 2006, vol. 6, pp. 2693–2698.
  14. G. Kramer, B. Mukherjee, and A. Maislos, Ethernet Passive Optical Networks. Wiley Online Library, 2005.
  15. M. Thanh Ngo, A. Gravey, and D. Bhadauria, “A mean value analysis approach for evaluating the performance of EPON with gated IPACT,” in Int. Conf. on Optical Network Design and Modeling (ONDM), 2008, pp. 1–6.
  16. B. Lannoo, L. Verslegers, D. Colle, M. Pickavet, M. Gagnaire, and P. Demeester, “Analytical model for the IPACT dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithm for EPONs,” J. Opt. Netw., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 677–688, 2007. [CrossRef]
  17. B. Lannoo, L. Verslegers, D. Colle, M. Pickavet, P. Demeester, and M. Gagnaire, “Thorough analysis of the IPACT dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithm for EPONs,” in 4th Int. Conf. on Broadband Communications, Networks and Systems (BROADNETS), 2007, pp. 486–494.
  18. S. Bharati and P. Saengudomlert, “Analysis of mean packet delay for dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithms in EPONs,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 28, no. 23, pp. 3454–3462, 2010.
  19. T. Holmberg, “Analysis of EPONs under the static priority scheduling scheme with fixed transmission times,” in Conf. on Next Generation Internet Design and Engineering, 2006, p. 8.
  20. J. Vardakas and M. Logothetis, “Packet delay analysis for priority-based passive optical networks,” in 1st Int. Conf. on Emerging Network Intelligence, Oct. 2009, pp. 103–107.
  21. A. Prado and A. Abelem, “Performance analysis of Ethernet passive optical networks with high load through a hybrid analytical/simulated model,” in EUROCON—Int. Conf. on Computer as a Tool (EUROCON), Apr. 2011, pp. 1–4.
  22. F. Aurzada, M. Scheutzow, M. Reisslein, N. Ghazisaidi, and M. Maier, “Capacity and delay analysis of next-generation passive optical networks (NGPONs),” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1378–1388, May2011. [CrossRef]
  23. L. Gutierrez, P. Garfias, and S. Sallent, “Analytical model of the IPACT DBA for EPONs with limited service,” Comput. Netw., 2012, submitted for publication.
  24. M. Woodward, Communication and Computer Networks: Modelling With Discrete-Time Queues. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1994.
  25. S. Tasaka, Performance Analysis of Multiple Access Protocols. The MIT Press, 1986.
  26. S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss, “An architecture for differentiated services,” IETF RFC 2475, 1998.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited