OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

  • Editors: K. Bergman and O. Gerstel
  • Vol. 4, Iss. 5 — May. 1, 2012
  • pp: 412–425

Analysis of Large-Scale Multi-Stage All-Optical Packet Switching Routers

Q. Xu, H. Rastegarfar, Y. Ben M’Sallem, A. Leon-Garcia, S. LaRochelle, and L. A. Rusch  »View Author Affiliations


Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 4, Issue 5, pp. 412-425 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.4.000412


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1378 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

All-optical packet switching can overcome limitations of electronic switches in terms of power consumption, speed, cost, and footprint. Switch architectures combining wavelength converters and fiber delay lines provide tunable routing and contention resolution when used with an N × N arrayed waveguide grating (AWG), a key passive optical component to bypass electronic processing limitations. An AWG passively routes either single or multiple input port wavelengths to output ports. A single wavelength per port strategy reduces crosstalk within the AWG, but drastically increases the dimensionality of the device. AWG design constraints due to bandwidth limitations and fabrication processes limit the port number for the foreseeable future to under 100. In order to scale optical switches to emerging network requirements, we must use multiple wavelengths per port. In this paper, we examine several optical router architectures for data center applications using multiple wavelengths per port, and quantify the physical layer impairments. We consider not only the AWG crosstalk, but also Q-factor degradation caused by the multiple wavelength conversions occurring when a packet is buffered for contention resolution. We present the results as a function of the number of recirculations for on–off-keying (OOK) signal formats. While previous work has addressed this issue in terms of accumulated loss, we focus on accumulated intensity noise due to crosstalk and amplified spontaneous emission (ASE). We compare the routing performance of each architecture, and we point out that the AWG crosstalk and accumulated ASE noise during packet recirculation are both critical to the routing performance.

© 2012 OSA

OCIS Codes
(050.2770) Diffraction and gratings : Gratings
(060.4259) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks, packet-switched

ToC Category:
Research Papers

History
Original Manuscript: September 9, 2011
Revised Manuscript: February 2, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: April 9, 2012
Published: April 30, 2012

Citation
Q. Xu, H. Rastegarfar, Y. Ben M’Sallem, A. Leon-Garcia, S. LaRochelle, and L. A. Rusch, "Analysis of Large-Scale Multi-Stage All-Optical Packet Switching Routers," J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 4, 412-425 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/jocn/abstract.cfm?URI=jocn-4-5-412


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. W. Tkach, “Scaling optical communications for the next decade and beyond,” Bell Labs Technical J., vol. 14, pp. 3–9, Win2010. [CrossRef]
  2. L. A. Barroso and U. Hölzle, “The datacenter as a computer: An introduction to the design of warehouse-scale machines,” in Synthesis Lectures on Computer Architecture. Morgan and Claypool Publishers, 2009, p. 108.
  3. A. F. Benner, P. K. Pepeljugoski, and R. J. Recio, “A roadmap to 100G ethernet at the Enterprise data center,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 45, pp. 10–17, Nov.2007.
  4. A. Leon-Garcia, K. Khavari, H. Rastegarfar, and A. Bigdeli, “Optical switching and scalability in datacenters,” presented at the 2010 IEEE Photonics Society Summer Topical Meeting, Playa del Carmen, 2010.
  5. X. Ye, Y. Yin, D. Ding, S. Johnson, V. Akella, and S. J. B. Yoo, “Assessment of optical switching in data center networks,” presented at the Optical Fiber Communication (OFC), collocated National Fiber Optic Engineers Conf., San Diego, CA, 2010.
  6. S. J. Ben Yoo, “Optical packet and burst switching technologies for the future photonic Internet,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 24, pp. 4468–4492, Dec.2006. [CrossRef]
  7. O. Ishida and H. Takahashi, “Loss-imbalance equalization in arrayed-wave-guide-grating (Awg) multiplexer cascades,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 13, pp. 1155–1163, June1995. [CrossRef]
  8. K. Okamoto, T. Hasegawa, O. Ishida, A. Himeno, and Y. Ohmori, “32×32 arrayed-waveguide grating multiplexer with uniform loss and cyclic frequency characteristics,” Electron. Lett., vol. 33, pp. 1865–1866, Oct.23, 1997. [CrossRef]
  9. G. Contestabile, L. Banchi, M. Presi, and E. Ciaramella, “Investigation of transparency of FWM in SOA to advanced modulation formats involving intensity, phase, and polarization multiplexing,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 27, pp. 4256–4261, Oct.1, 2009. [CrossRef]
  10. Z. H. Li, Y. Dong, J. Y. Mo, Y. X. Wang, and C. Lu, “Cascaded all-optical wavelength conversion for RZ-DPSK signal based on four-wave mixing in semiconductor optical amplifier,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 16, pp. 1685–1687, July2004. [CrossRef]
  11. M. Matsuura, N. Kishi, and T. Miki, “Ultrawideband wavelength conversion using cascaded SOA-based wavelength converters,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 25, pp. 38–45, Jan.2007. [CrossRef]
  12. D. Nielsen, S. L. Chuang, N. J. Kim, D. Lee, S. H. Pyun, W. G. Jeong, C. Y. Chen, and T. S. Lay, “High-speed wavelength conversion in quantum dot and quantum well semiconductor optical amplifiers,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 92, May26, 2008.
  13. C. Politi, D. Klonidis, and M. J. O’Mahony, “Waveband converters based on four-wave mixing in SOAs,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 24, pp. 1203–1217, Mar.2006. [CrossRef]
  14. Q. Xu, A. Ghazisaeidi, S. Doucet, Y. Ben M’Sallem, L. A. Rusch, and S. LaRochelle, “Tunable SOA wavelength converter for optical packet switching router,” presented at the IEEE Photonics Society 23rd Ann. Meeting, Denver, CO, 2010.
  15. Q. Xu, H. Rastegarfar, Y. Ben M’Sallem, S. LaRochelle, A. Leon-Garcia, and L. A. Rusch, “OOK Q-factor degradation in scalable optical switches,” presented at the IEEE Int. Conf. on High Performance Switching and Routing, Cartagena, Spain, 2011.
  16. R. Gaudino, G. A. G. Castillo, F. Neri, and J. M. Finochietto, “Can simple optical switching fabrics scale to terabit per second switch capacities?,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw., vol. 1, pp. B56–B69, Aug.1, 2009. [CrossRef]
  17. S. Kamei, M. Ishii, A. Kaneko, T. Shibata, and M. Itoh, “N×N cyclic-frequency router with improved performance based on arrayed-waveguide grating,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 27, pp. 4097–4104, Sept.15, 2009. [CrossRef]
  18. M. C. Chia, D. K. Hunter, I. Andonovic, P. Ball, I. Wright, S. P. Ferguson, K. M. Guild, and M. J. O’Mahony, “Packet loss and delay performance of feedback and feed-forward arrayed-waveguide gratings-based optical packet switches with WDM inputs–outputs,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1241–1254, 2001. [CrossRef]
  19. L. Li, S. D. Scott, and J. S. Deogun, “A novel fiber delay line buffering architecture for optical packet switching,” presented at the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conf., 2003.
  20. S. Iyer, R. Zhang, and N. McKeown, “Routers with a single stage of buffering,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communications Review, vol. 32, pp. 251–264, 2002. [CrossRef]
  21. C. Clos, “A study of non-blocking switching networks,” Bell System Technical J., vol. 32, pp. 406–424, 1953.
  22. J. Cheyns, C. Develder, E. Van Breusegem, D. Colle, F. De Turck, P. Lagasse, M. Pickavet, and P. Demeester, “Clos lives on in optical packet switching,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 42, pp. 114–121, Feb.2004.
  23. H. Takahashi, K. Oda, and H. Toba, “Impact of crosstalk in an arrayed-waveguide multiplexer on N×N optical interconnection,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 14, pp. 1097–1105, June1996. [CrossRef]
  24. S. J. Ben Yoo, F. Xue, Y. Bansal, J. Taylor, Z. Pan, J. Cao, M. Jeon, T. Nady, G. Goncher, K. Boyer, K. Okamoto, S. Kamei, and V. Akella, “High-performance optical-label switching packet routers and smart edge routers for the next-generation internet,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 21, pp. 1041–1051, Sept.2003. [CrossRef]
  25. M. R. Hashemi and A. LeonGarcia, “A general purpose cell sequencer/scheduler for ATM switches,” in IEEE Infocom’97 - the Conf. on Computer Communications, Proc., 1997, vol. 1–3, pp. 29–37.
  26. Y. K. Yeo, Z. W. Xu, D. W. Wang, J. G. Liu, Y. X. Wang, and T. H. Cheng, “High-speed optical switch fabrics with large port count,” Opt. Express, vol. 17, pp. 10990–10997, June22, 2009. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. JDSU, “100 GHz Wavelength Division Multiplexer/Demultiplexer” [Online]. Available: http://www.jdsu.com.
  28. Enablence, “100 GHz N×N Arrayed Waveguide Router” [Online]. Available: http://www.enablence.com.
  29. G. P. Agrawal, Fiber-optic Communication Systems. 3rd ed.Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2002.
  30. I. Roudas, N. Antoniades, T. Otani, T. E. Stern, R. E. Wagner, and D. Q. Chowdhury, “Accurate modeling of optical multiplexer/demultiplexer concatenation in transparent multiwavelength optical networks,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 20, pp. 921–936, June2002. [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited