OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

  • Editors: K. Bergman and O. Gerstel
  • Vol. 4, Iss. 6 — Jun. 1, 2012
  • pp: 480–489

Priority Based Routing and Wavelength Assignment With Traffic Grooming for Optical Networks

Bijoy Chand Chatterjee, Nityananda Sarma, and Partha Pritim Sahu  »View Author Affiliations

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 4, Issue 6, pp. 480-489 (2012)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1272 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



One of the challenging issues in optical networks is call blocking and it increases with the number of connection requests due to the limited number of wavelength channels in each fiber link. In this paper, we propose a priority based routing and wavelength assignment scheme with incorporation of a traffic grooming mechanism (PRWATG) to reduce call blocking. In this scheme, the connection requests having the same source–destination (s–d) pair are groomed first to avoid intermediate optical–electrical–optical conversation and then these groomed connection requests are served for routing and wavelength assignment according to their priority order. The priority order of each groomed connection request is estimated based on type of path (direct link physical path or indirect link physical path) first and then the traffic volume. If the priority order of connection requests is estimated using these criteria, blocking of connection requests due to wavelength continuity constraints can be reduced to a great extent, which will in turn lead to better performance of the network in terms of lower blocking probability and congestion. The performance analysis of our proposed scheme is made in terms of blocking probability and congestion and compared with a similar non-priority based routing and wavelength assignment scheme (NPRWATG). It is seen that using the PRWATG scheme, the blocking probability and the congestion of the network are significantly reduced compared to NPRWATG. It is also seen that the performance of the proposed scheme is better compared to NPRWATG when the number of connection requests increases in the network.

© 2012 OSA

OCIS Codes
(060.2330) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics communications
(060.1155) Fiber optics and optical communications : All-optical networks

ToC Category:
Research Papers

Original Manuscript: November 7, 2011
Revised Manuscript: February 16, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: April 21, 2012
Published: May 15, 2012

Bijoy Chand Chatterjee, Nityananda Sarma, and Partha Pritim Sahu, "Priority Based Routing and Wavelength Assignment With Traffic Grooming for Optical Networks," J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 4, 480-489 (2012)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. H. Zang, J. Jue, L. Sahasrabuddhe, R. Ramamurthy, and B. Mukherjee, “Dynamic lightpath establishment in wavelength routed WDM networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 100–108, 2001.
  2. B. Mukherjee, Optical WDM Networks. Springer, 2006.
  3. R. M. C. Siva and G. Mohan, WDM Optical Networks: Concepts, Design and Algorithms. PHI, 2003.
  4. Nokia Siemens Networks Says 100 Gbps Capabilities Commercially Available, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.fiberise.com/nokia-siemens-networks-says-100-gbps-capabilities-commercially-available.
  5. N. Kataoka, N. Wada, G. Cincotti, and K. Kitayama, “2.56 Tbps (40-Gbps × 8-wavelength × 4-OC × 2-POL) asynchronous WDM-OCDMA-PON using a multi-port encoder/decoder,” in 37th European Conf. and Exhibition on Optical Communication (ECOC), 2011, pp. 1–3.
  6. K. Zhu and B. Mukherjee, “Traffic grooming in an optical WDM mesh network,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 122–133, 2002. [CrossRef]
  7. T. De, P. Jain, and A. Pal, “Distributed dynamic grooming routing and wavelength assignment in WDM optical mesh networks,” Photonic Network Commun., vol. 21, pp. 117–126, 2011. [CrossRef]
  8. C. Colbourn, G. Quattrocchi, and V. Syrotiuk, “Grooming traffic to maximize throughput in SONET rings,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 10–16, 2011. [CrossRef]
  9. A. Balma, N. Hadj-Alouane, and A. Hadj-Alouane, “A near-optimal solution approach for the multi-hop traffic grooming problem,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 891–901, 2011. [CrossRef]
  10. S. Huang, M. Xia, C. Martel, and B. Mukherjee, “Survivable multipath traffic grooming in telecom mesh networks with inverse multiplexing,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 545–557, 2010. [CrossRef]
  11. H. Zang, J. P. Jue, and B. Mukherjee, “A review of routing and wavelength assignment approaches for wavelength-routed optical WDM networks,” Opt. Networks Mag., vol. 1, pp. 47–60, 2000.
  12. S. Subramaniam and R. Barry, “Wavelength assignment in fixed routing WDM networks,” in IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications, 1997, pp. 406–410.
  13. P. Rajalakshmi and A. Jhunjhunwala, “Re-routing at critical nodes to enhance performance of wavelength reassignment in all-optical WDM networks without wavelength conversion,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 26, pp. 3021–3029, 2008. [CrossRef]
  14. D. M. Shan, K. C. Chua, G. Mohan, and M. H. Phunq, “Priority-based offline wavelength assignment in OBS networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 1694–1704, 2008. [CrossRef]
  15. Y. Wang, T. H. Cheng, and M. Ma, “Priority and maximum revenue based routing and wavelength assignment for all-optical WDM networks,” in IEEE Int. Conf. on Research, Innovation and Vision for the Future, Mar.2007, pp. 135–139.
  16. A. Das and P. P. Sahu, “Compact integrated optical devices using high index contrast waveguides,” in Int. Conf. on Wireless and Optical Communications Networks, 2006.
  17. P. P. Sahu and A. Das, “Polarization-insensitive thermo-optic Mach Zehnder device based on silicon oxinitride waveguide with fast response time,” Fiber Integr. Opt., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 10–20, 2010.
  18. P. P. Sahu, “Polarization insensitive thermally tunable add/drop multiplexer using cascaded Mach–Zehnder coupler,” Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt., vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 247–252, 2008. [CrossRef]
  19. SONET/SDH Technical Summary [Online]. Available: http://www.techfest.com/networking/wan/sonet.htm.
  20. P. P. Sahu, “New traffic grooming approaches in optical networks under restricted shared protection,” Photonic Network Commun., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 233–238, 2008. [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited