OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

  • Editors: K. Bergman and O. Gerstel
  • Vol. 5, Iss. 1 — Jan. 1, 2013
  • pp: 1–12

Monte-Carlo-Based Channel Characterization for Underwater Optical Communication Systems

Chadi Gabriel, Mohammad-Ali Khalighi, Salah Bourennane, Pierre Léon, and Vincent Rigaud  »View Author Affiliations


Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 1-12 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.5.000001


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (837 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We consider channel characterization for underwater wireless optical communication (UWOC) systems. We focus on the channel impulse response and, in particular, quantify the channel time dispersion for different water types, link distances, and transmitter/receiver characteristics, taking into account realistic parameters. We use the Monte Carlo approach to simulate the trajectories of emitted photons propagating in water from the transmitter towards the receiver. During their propagation, photons are absorbed or scattered as a result of their interaction with different particles present in water. To model angle scattering, we use the two-term Henyey–Greenstein model in our channel simulator. We show that this model is more accurate than the commonly used Henyey–Greenstein model, especially in pure sea waters. Through the numerical results that we present, we show that, except for highly turbid waters, the channel time dispersion can be neglected when working over moderate distances. In other words, under such conditions, we do not suffer from any inter-symbol interference in the received signal. Lastly, we study the performance of a typical UWOC system in terms of bit-error-rate using the simple on–off-keying modulation. The presented results give insight into the design of UWOC systems.

© 2013 OSA

OCIS Codes
(060.0060) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics and optical communications
(060.2605) Fiber optics and optical communications : Free-space optical communication

ToC Category:
Research Papers

History
Original Manuscript: November 30, 2011
Revised Manuscript: October 23, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: October 26, 2012
Published: December 11, 2012

Citation
Chadi Gabriel, Mohammad-Ali Khalighi, Salah Bourennane, Pierre Léon, and Vincent Rigaud, "Monte-Carlo-Based Channel Characterization for Underwater Optical Communication Systems," J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 5, 1-12 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/jocn/abstract.cfm?URI=jocn-5-1-1


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. International Sensor Development Network, SENSEnet [Online]. Available: http://www.eu-sensenet.net/.
  2. B. M. Cochenour, L. J. Mullen, and A. E. Laux, “Characterization of the beam-spread function for underwater wireless optical communications links,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 513–521, Oct.2008. [CrossRef]
  3. I. F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia, “Underwater acoustic sensor networks: Research challenges,” Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 257–279, 2005. [CrossRef]
  4. G. Shah, “A survey on medium access control in underwater acoustic sensor networks,” in Int. Conf. Workshops on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (WAINA), Bradford, UK, May 2009, pp. 1178–1183.
  5. F. Pignieri, F. De Rango, F. Veltri, and S. Marano, “Markovian approach to model underwater acoustic channel: Techniques comparison,” in Military Communications Conf. (MILCOM), San Diego, CA, Nov. 2008, pp. 1–7.
  6. F. Hanson and S. Radic, “High bandwidth underwater optical communication,” Appl. Opt., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 277–283, Jan.2008. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. J. W. Giles and I. Bankman, “Underwater optical communcations systems. Part 2: Basic design considerations,” in IEEE Military Communications Conf. (MILCOM), Atlantic City, NJ, Oct. 2005, vol. 3, pp. 1700–1705.
  8. D. Anguita, D. Brizzolara, and G. Parodi, “Building an underwater wireless sensor network based on optical communication: Research challenges and current results,” in Int. Conf. on Sensor Technologies and Applications (SENSORCOMM), Athens, Greece, Aug. 2009, pp. 476–479.
  9. S. Arnon, “Underwater optical wireless communication network,” Opt. Eng., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–6, Jan.2010. [CrossRef]
  10. S. Jaruwatanadilok, “Underwater wireless optical communication channel modeling and performance evaluation using vector radiative transfer theory,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1620–1627, Dec.2008. [CrossRef]
  11. C. Gabriel, M. A. Khalighi, S. Bourennane, P. Léon, and V. Rigaud, “Channel modeling for underwater optical communication,” in IEEE Workshop on Optical Wireless Communications, Global Communication Conf., Houston, TX, Dec. 2011, pp. 833–837.
  12. C. D. Mobley, Light and Water: Radiative Transfer in Natural Waters. Academic Press, June1994.
  13. J. H. Smart, “Underwater optical communications systems. Part 1: Variability of water optical parameters,” in IEEE Military Communications Conf., Atlantic City, NJ, Oct. 2005, vol. 2, pp. 1140–1146.
  14. T. J. Petzold, “Volume scattering functions for selected ocean waters,” Tech. Rep. SIO 7278, Scripps Institute of Oceanography, 1972.
  15. I. Vasilescu, K. Kotay, D. Rus, M. Dunbabin, and P. Corke, “Data collection, storage, and retrieval with an underwater sensor network,” in Int. Conf. on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), San Diego, CA, Nov. 2005, pp. 154–165.
  16. I. Vasilescu, C. Detweiler, and D. Rus, “Aquanodes: An underwater sensor network,” in Workshop on Underwater Networks (WuWNet), MobiCom Conf., Montreal, Canada, Sept. 2007, pp. 85–88.
  17. M. Tivey, P. Fucile, and E. Sichel, “A low power, low cost, underwater optical communication system,” Ridge 2000 Events, pp. 27–29, Apr.2004.
  18. F. Schill, U. R. Zimmer, and J. Trumpf, “Visible spectrum optical communication and distance sensing for underwater applications,” in Australian Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ACRA), Canberra, Australia, Dec. 2004.
  19. M. Doniec, I. Vasilescu, M. Chitre, and C. Detweiler, “AquaOptical: A lightweight device for high-rate long-range underwater point-to-point communication,” in IEEE OCEANS Conf., Biloxi, MS, Oct. 2009, pp. 1–6.
  20. J. Lu, S. Lee, J. Mounzer, and C. Schurgers, “Low-cost medium range optical underwater modem,” in ACM Int. Workshop on UnderWater Networks (WUWNet), Berkeley, CA, Nov. 2009.
  21. C. D. Mobley, B. Gentili, H. R. Gordon, Z. Jin, G. W. Kattawar, A. Morel, P. Reinersman, K. Stamnes, and R. H. Stavn, “Comparison of numerical models for computing underwater light fields,” Appl. Opt., vol. 32, no. 36, pp. 7484–7504, Dec.1993. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. D. J. Bogucki, J. Piskozub, M.-E. Carr, and G. D. Spiers, “Monte Carlo simulation of propagation of a short light beam through turbulent oceanic flow,” Opt. Express, vol. 15, no. 21, pp. 13988–13996, Oct.2007. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. L. C. Andrews and R. L. Phillips, Laser Beam Propagation Through Random Media, 2nd ed.SPIE Press, 2005.
  24. M. A. Khalighi, N. Schwartz, N. Aitamer, and S. Bourennane, “Fading reduction by aperture averaging and spatial diversity in optical wireless systems,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 580–593, Nov.2009. [CrossRef]
  25. J. A. Simpson, B. L. Hughes, and J. F. Muth, “A spatial diversity system to measure optical fading in an underwater communications channel,” in IEEE OCEANS Conf., Biloxi, MS, Oct. 2009, pp. 1–6.
  26. F. Hanson and M. Lasher, “Effects of underwater turbulence on laser beam propagation and coupling into single-mode optical fiber,” Appl. Opt., vol. 49, no. 16, pp. 3224–3230, June2010. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles. Wiley, 1988.
  28. V. I. Haltrin and G. W. Kattawar, “Self-consistent solutions to the equation of transfer with elastic and inelastic scattering in oceanic optics: I. Model,” Appl. Opt., vol. 32, no. 27, pp. 5356–5367, 1993. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. V. I. Haltrin, “Chlorophyll-based model of seawater optical properties,” Appl. Opt., vol. 38, no. 33, pp. 6826–6832, Nov.1999. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. G. Kervern, “Lidars sous-marins,” Techniques de l’Ingénieur, vol. 6, no. E4325, pp. 1–7, Nov.1997.
  31. A. Ishimaru, Wave Propagation and Scattering in Random Media. IEEE Press, 1997.
  32. L. Wang, S. L. Jacques, and L. Zheng, “MCML, Monte Carlo modeling of light transport in multi-layered tissues,” Tech. Rep., Laser Biology Research Laboratory, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Nov.1995.
  33. H. C. van de Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles. Dover Publications, 1981.
  34. Yu. I. Kopilevich, M. E. Kononenko, and E. I. Zadorozhnaya, “The effect of the forward-scattering index on the characteristics of a light beam in sea water,” J. Opt. Technol., vol. 77, no. 10, pp. 598–601, Oct.2010. [CrossRef]
  35. L. Mullen, D. Alley, and B. Cochenour, “Investigation of the effect of scattering agent and scattering albedo on modulated light propagation in water,” Appl. Opt., vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 1396–1404, Apr.2011. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. V. Haltrin, “One-parameter two-term Henyey–Greenstein phase function for ligth scattering in seawater,” Appl. Opt., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1022–1028, Feb.2002. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. V. I. Haltrin, “Two-term Henyey–Greenstein light scattering phase function for seawater,” in Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp. (IGARSS), Hamburg, Germany, June–July 1999, pp. 1423–1425.
  38. V. Timofeyeva, “Relation between light-field parameters and between scattering phase function characteristics of turbid media, including seawater,” Izv., Acad. Sci. USSR, Atmos. Ocean Phys., vol. 14, pp. 834–848, 1978.
  39. J. D. Gibson, Ed., Mobile Communications Handbook, 2nd ed.CRC Press, 1999.
  40. B. Cochenour, L. Mullen, and J. Muth, “Effect of scattering albedo on attenuation and polarization of light underwater,” Opt. Lett., vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 2088–2090, June2010. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. F. Xu, M. A. Khalighi, and S. Bourennane, “Impact of different noise sources on the performance of PIN- and APD-based FSO receivers,” in COST IC0802 Workshop, IEEE ConTEL Conf., Graz, Austria, June 2011, pp. 279–286.
  42. M. A. Khalighi, F. Xu, Y. Jaafar, and S. Bourennane, “Double-laser differential signaling for reducing the effect of background radiation in free-space optical systems,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 145–154, Feb.2011. [CrossRef]
  43. M. Katz, Introduction to Geometrical Optics. World Scientific, 2002.
  44. B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics. Wiley, 1991.
  45. Hamamatsu Opto-semiconductor Products [Online]. Available: http://jp.hamamatsu.com/products/sensor-ssd/index_en.html.
  46. D. G. Steel and L. Bayvel, Eds., Encyclopedia of Modern Optics. vol. 1, Elsevier, 2004.
  47. K. Kiasaleh, “Performance of APD-based, PPM free-space optical communication systems in atmospheric turbulence,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1455–1461, Sept.2005. [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited