OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

  • Editors: K. Bergman and O. Gerstel
  • Vol. 5, Iss. 12 — Dec. 1, 2013
  • pp: 1456–1466

Methodology for a Cost Evaluation of Migration Toward NGOA Networks

Carmen Mas Machuca, Mario Kind, Kun Wang, Koen Casier, Mozhgan Mahloo, and Jiajia Chen  »View Author Affiliations


Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 5, Issue 12, pp. 1456-1466 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.5.001456


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1057 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Evolution of optical access networks promises to bring higher bandwidth to more customers. However, this evolution toward so-called next generation optical access (NGOA) networks also introduces additional challenges that operators and/or vendors have to address: how to properly estimate and compare different NGOA architectures and their evolutionary paths in terms of their economics. Calculating the total cost of ownership (TCO) for NGOA networks is a very complex target as it needs to involve good knowledge of the technology, the existing network infrastructure, and any migration-related processes. In this paper a complete methodology is presented for evaluating the TCO of the migration toward a NGOA network. It contains a detailed description of which key aspects have to be considered, which processes they affect, and how they are translated into costs in a logical manner. Finally, it also shows how this methodology has been applied to particular selected cases and how it gives a detailed view of all costs involved in migration. This approach opens up opportunities to cooperate in techno-economic research using it as a base. Both operators and vendors can also utilize this approach to get a useful economic background of their future investments and potential sales.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(060.4250) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks
(060.4256) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks, network optimization

ToC Category:
Research Papers

History
Original Manuscript: July 19, 2013
Revised Manuscript: October 16, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: October 16, 2013
Published: November 27, 2013

Citation
Carmen Mas Machuca, Mario Kind, Kun Wang, Koen Casier, Mozhgan Mahloo, and Jiajia Chen, "Methodology for a Cost Evaluation of Migration Toward NGOA Networks," J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 5, 1456-1466 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/jocn/abstract.cfm?URI=jocn-5-12-1456


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. Full Service Access Network (FSAN) Group Forum [Online]. Available: http://www.fsan.org/ .
  2. “10-Gigabit-capable passive optical network (XG-PON) systems: Definitions, abbreviations and acronyms,” , 2012.
  3. H. Kuwahara and J. Theodoras, “Series editorial optical communications,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol.  47, no. 11, pp. s2–s4, Nov. 2009. [CrossRef]
  4. Y. Luo, X. Zhou, F. Effenberger, X. Yan, G. Peng, Y. Qian, and Y. Ma, “Time- and wavelength-division multiplexed passive optical network (TWDM-PON) for next-generation PON Stage 2 (NG-PON2),” J. Lightwave Technol., vol.  31, no. 4, pp. 587–593, Feb. 2013. [CrossRef]
  5. C. Lange, D. Breuer, and R. Huelsermann, “Cost effectiveness of site reduction in optical access network: A CapEx based comparison of different technologies,” in Int. Conf. on Transparent Optical Networks, Azores, Portugal, June28–July 2, 2009.
  6. J. Li and G. Shen, “Cost minimization planning for Greenfield passive optical networks,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw., vol.  1, pp. 17–29, June 2009. [CrossRef]
  7. S. Kulkarni, B. Polonsky, and M. El-Sayed, “FTTH network economics: key parameters impacting technology decisions,” in 13th Int. Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symp., Sept.–Oct. 2008, pp. 1–27.
  8. C. Mas Machuca, J. Chen, and L. Wosinska, “Cost-efficient protection in TDM PONs,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol.  50, no. 8, pp. 110–117, Aug. 2012. [CrossRef]
  9. K. Casier, “Techno-economic evaluation of a next generation access network deployment in a competitive setting,” Ph.D. dissertation, Ghent University, 2009.
  10. M. Mahloo, C. Mas Machuca, J. Chen, and L. Wosinska, “Protection cost evaluation of WDM-based next generation optical access networks,” Opt. Switching Networking, vol.  10, no. 1, pp. 89–99, 2013. [CrossRef]
  11. L. Zhou, C. Mas Machuca, R. Zhao, and K. Grunert, “Migration towards fiber to the home: Key cost factors,” in Asia Communications and Photonics Conf. and Exhibition (ACP), Shanghai, China, Dec. 2010.
  12. S. Turk, R. Radeke, and R. Lehnert, “Network migration using ant colony optimization,” in 9th Conf. on Telecommunications Internet and Media Techno Economics (CTTE), June7–9, 2010.
  13. F. Büllingen, A. Hillebrand, P. Stamm, and A. Stetter, “Cable industry strategies for the NGA world,” , Feb. 2012.
  14. “Requirements for European next-generation optical access networks,” , June 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.ict-oase.eu/index.php?page=120& .
  15. R. Hülsermann, K. Grobe, and D. Breuer, “Cost and performance evaluation of WDM-based access networks,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conf. and the Nat. Fiber Optic Engineers Conf., 2013, paper NTh3F.4.
  16. TONIC project 2000–2004, “Techno-economics of IP optimised networks and services,” European Union, EU IST, .
  17. O. Kipouridis, C. Mas Machuca, A. Autenrieth, and K. Grobe, “Street-aware infrastructure planning tool for next generation optical access networks,” in 16th Int. Conf. on Optical Network Design and Modeling, Colchester, UK, Apr. 2012.
  18. BPMN: Business Process Model and Notation [Online]. Available: www.bpmn.org .
  19. R. S. Kaplan and S. Anderson, “Time-driven activity-based costing,” Harvard Business Rev., vol.  82, no. 11, pp. 131–138, 2004.
  20. C. Mas Machuca, S. Krauß, and K. Casier, “Fault management and service provisioning process model of next generation access networks,” in Int. Conf. on Network and Service Management, Paris, France, Oct. 2011.
  21. C. Mas Machuca, “NGOA cost modelling and its application to HPON cost evaluation,” in Workshop on Techno-economic Comparison of Next Generation Optical Access Solutions for NGPON2 at 11th Conf. of Telecommunication, Media and Internet Techno-Economics, Athens, Greece, June 2012.
  22. “Market demands and revenues,” , June 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.ict-oase.eu/index.php?page=120& .
  23. K. Grobe, M. Roppelt, A. Autenrieth, J.-P. Elbers, and M. Eiselt, “Cost and energy consumption analysis of advanced WDM-PONs,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. s25–s32, Feb. 2011.
  24. C. Mas Machuca, S. Krauß, and M. Kind, “Migration from GPON to hybrid PON: Complete cost evaluation,” in Photonische Netze, Leipzig, May 2013.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited