OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

  • Editors: K. Bergman and O. Gerstel
  • Vol. 6, Iss. 2 — Feb. 1, 2014
  • pp: 96–103

Traffic Grooming for IP-Over-WDM Networks: Energy and Delay Perspectives

Chankyun Lee and June-Koo Kevin Rhee  »View Author Affiliations

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 6, Issue 2, pp. 96-103 (2014)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (721 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



As energy consumption has become a major concern of networks, traffic grooming studies on Internet protocol over wavelength division multiplexing (IP-over-WDM) networks have been revisited for energy-efficient optical network applications. Traffic grooming techniques can save on the number of installed lightpaths and corresponding IP router line cards at the cost of traffic processing overhead. Energy awareness in networking device development has initiated improvement of the energy–traffic proportionality of networking devices. Accordingly, networks will consist of networking devices with a wide range of energy–traffic proportionalities. Therefore, previously known traffic grooming techniques may not achieve energy-efficient networking in high energy–traffic proportional networks. Moreover, the traffic grooming technique tends to prefer longer paths, which are responsible for longer transmission delays. These two concerns trigger investigation of new aspects of heuristic traffic grooming algorithms for green and low delay optical networks consisting of network devices with diverse energy–traffic proportionalities. This paper demonstrates that a heuristic traffic grooming algorithm enhanced by comparison with direct bypass routing improves both energy and delay performances in a high energy–traffic proportionality regime. A hottest-first sorting policy in flow provisioning can further improve delay performance even in a low energy–traffic proportionality regime.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(060.2330) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics communications
(060.4250) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks
(060.4251) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks, assignment and routing algorithms
(060.4265) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks, wavelength routing

ToC Category:
Research Papers

Original Manuscript: April 4, 2013
Revised Manuscript: November 6, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: December 1, 2013
Published: January 6, 2014

Chankyun Lee and June-Koo Kevin Rhee, "Traffic Grooming for IP-Over-WDM Networks: Energy and Delay Perspectives," J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 6, 96-103 (2014)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. M. Gupta and S. Singh, “Greening of the Internet,” in ACM SIGCOMM, Karlsruhe, Germany, Aug. 2003.
  2. J. Chabarek, J. Sommers, P. Barford, C. Estan, D. Tsiang, and S. Wright, “Power awareness in network design and routing,” in IEEE INFOCOM, Phoenix, AZ, Apr. 2008.
  3. P. Mahadevan, P. Sharma, S. Banerjee, and P. Ranganathan, “A power benchmarking framework for network devices,” in Proc. Int. IFIP Networking Conf., Aachen, Germany, May 2009.
  4. L. A. Barroso and U. Hölzle, “The case for energy-proportional computing,” Computer, vol.  40, no. 12, pp. 33–37, Dec. 2007. [CrossRef]
  5. D. Abts, M. Marty, P. Wells, P. Klausler, and H. Liu, “Energy proportional datacenter networks,” in ACM Int. Symp. on Computer Architecture, Saint-Malo, France, 2010.
  6. K. Zhu and B. Mukherjee, “Traffic grooming in an optical WDM mesh network,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol.  20, no. 1, pp. 122–133, Jan. 2002. [CrossRef]
  7. R. Dutta and G. Rouskas, “On optimal traffic grooming in WDM rings,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol.  20, no. 1, pp. 110–121, Jan. 2002. [CrossRef]
  8. Y. Zhang, M. Tornatore, P. Chowdhury, and B. Mukherjee, “Energy optimization in IP-over-WDM networks,” Opt. Switching Networking, vol.  8, no. 3, pp. 171–180, July 2011. [CrossRef]
  9. S. Huang, D. Seshadri, and R. Dutta, “Traffic grooming: A changing role in green optical networks,” in IEEE GLOBECOM, Honolulu, HI, Dec. 2009.
  10. G. Shen and R. Tucker, “Energy-minimized design for IP over WDM networks,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw., vol.  1, no. 1, pp. 176–186, June 2009. [CrossRef]
  11. E. Yetginer and G. Rouskas, “Power efficient traffic grooming in optical WDM networks,” in IEEE GLOBECOM, Honolulu, HI, Dec. 2009.
  12. Y. Kim, C. Lee, J. K.-K. Rhee, and S. Lee, “IP-over-WDM cross-layer design for green optical networking with energy proportionality consideration,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol.  30, no. 13, pp. 2088–2096, July 2012. [CrossRef]
  13. J. K.-K. Rhee, C. Lee, J. Choi, J. Kim, Y. Won, and J. Choi, “Power and cost reduction by hybrid optical packet switching with shared memory buffering,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol.  49, no. 5, pp. 102–110, May 2011. [CrossRef]
  14. C. Lee and J. K.-K. Rhee, “Heated-flow-first traffic grooming for power and delay aware optical network,” in Photonics in Switching, Ajaccio, France, Sept. 2012.
  15. R. S. Tucker, R. Parthiban, J. Baliga, K. Hinton, R. W. A. Ayre, and W. V. Sorin, “Evolution of WDM optical IP networks: A cost and energy perspective,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol.  27, no. 3, pp. 243–252, Feb. 2009. [CrossRef]
  16. NIST, “Knapsack problem,” 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.nist.gov/dads/HTML/knapsackProblem.html .

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited