OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

  • Editors: K. Bergman and O. Gerstel
  • Vol. 6, Iss. 3 — Mar. 1, 2014
  • pp: 238–249

Evaluation of the Techno-Economic Viability of Point-to-Point Dark Fiber Access Infrastructure in Europe

Marlies Van der Wee, Sofie Verbrugge, Mathieu Tahon, Didier Colle, and Mario Pickavet  »View Author Affiliations


Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 6, Issue 3, pp. 238-249 (2014)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.6.000238


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1277 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Upgrading telecommunications access networks requires large investments in deploying new optical infrastructure, especially in terms of construction works and costs to reach the end-user, which seem only affordable in densely populated areas. By evaluating a cost-benefit analysis for the deployment of a point-to-point dark fiber infrastructure, this paper investigates how the economic risk of dark fiber deployment can be estimated and/or reduced in different settings. By applying the model on specific scenarios, which differ in area type, demand uptake, and revenue scheme, it is concluded that the business case is only viable in a dense urban area with an aggressive take-up. In the other scenarios, the paper investigates possibilities and opportunities to improve the business case and hence decrease the investment risk. Examples of this improvement include prolonging the planning horizon, ensuring revenue from the start of the project by performing demand aggregation, or examining where public funds might help.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(060.4510) Fiber optics and optical communications : Optical communications
(060.1155) Fiber optics and optical communications : All-optical networks
(060.4256) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks, network optimization

ToC Category:
Research Papers

History
Original Manuscript: October 3, 2013
Revised Manuscript: December 16, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: December 19, 2013
Published: February 5, 2014

Citation
Marlies Van der Wee, Sofie Verbrugge, Mathieu Tahon, Didier Colle, and Mario Pickavet, "Evaluation of the Techno-Economic Viability of Point-to-Point Dark Fiber Access Infrastructure in Europe," J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 6, 238-249 (2014)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/jocn/abstract.cfm?URI=jocn-6-3-238


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. K. Casier, S. Verbrugge, R. Meersman, D. Colle, M. Pickavet, and P. Demeester, “A clear and balanced view on FTTH deployment costs,” J. Inst. Telecommun. Prof., vol.  2, no. 3, pp. 27–30, 2008.
  2. European Commission, “A Digital Agenda for Europe, ” [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0245:FIN:EN:PDF .
  3. S. Jay, K.-H. Neumann, and T. Plückebaum, “Comparing FTTH access networks based on P2P and PMP fibre topologies,” in Conf. of Telecommunication, Media and Internet Techno-Economics (CTTE), Berlin, Germany, 2011.
  4. Analysys Mason, “The costs of deploying fibre-based next-generation broadband infrastructure,” Report for the Broadband Stakeholder Group, 2008.
  5. S. Jay, K.-H. Neumann, and T. Plückebaum, “The cost of nationwide fibre access in Germany,” Commun. Strategies, vol.  85, pp. 169–188, 2012.
  6. T. Monath, N. Kristian, P. Cadro, D. Katsianis, and D. Varoutas, “Economics of fixed broadband access network strategies,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol.  41, no. 9, pp. 132–139, 2003. [CrossRef]
  7. N. Ghazisaidi and M. Maier, “Techno-economic analysis of EPON and WiMAX for future fiber-wireless (FiWi) networks,” Comput. Netw., vol.  54, no. 15, pp. 2640–2650, 2010. [CrossRef]
  8. T. Rokkas, I. Neokosmidis, D. Katsianis, and D. Varoutas, “Cost analysis of WDM and TDM fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) networks: A system-of-systems approach,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., Part C Appl. Rev., vol.  42, no. 6, pp. 1842–1853, 2012. [CrossRef]
  9. M. Van der Wee, C. Mattsson, A. Raju, O. Braet, A. Nucciarelli, B. Sadowski, S. Verbrugge, and M. Pickavet, “Making a success of FTTH learning from case studies in Europe,” J. Inst. Telecommun. Prof., vol.  5, no. 4, pp. 22–31, 2011.
  10. Alcatel-Lucent, “Get to fast, faster. Accelerate the existing copper plant with VDSL2 vectoring and bonding,” Strategic white paper, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com .
  11. OASE, “Integrated OASE results overview,” White paper [Online]. Available: http://www.ict-oase.eu/ .
  12. European Commission, “Commission recommendation of 17 December 2007 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante regulation in accordance with Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services,” Official J. Eur. Union, vol. 50, no. L 344, pp. 65–69, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:344:0065:0069:en:PDF .
  13. European Commission, “EU guidelines for the application of State aid rules in relation to the rapid deployment of broadband networks,” Official J. Eur. Union, vol. 56, no. C 25, pp. 1–26, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2013:025:0001:0026:EN:PDF .
  14. European Commission, “DG competition. Article 87 of the EC Treaty” [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/legislation/treaties/ec/art87_en.html .
  15. C. M. Machuca, K. Wang, S. Verbrugge, K. Casier, M. Kind, R. Hülsermann, and S. Krauß, “Cost-based assessment of NGOA architectures and its impact in the business model,” in Conf. of Telecommunication, Media and Internet Techno-Economics (CTTE), Athens, Greece, 2012.
  16. C. Christodoulos, C. Michalakelis, and D. Varoutas, “Forecasting with limited data: Combining ARIMA and diffusion models,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol.  77, no. 4, pp. 558–565, 2010. [CrossRef]
  17. OASE, “Market demands and revenues,” [Online]. Available: http://www.ict-oase.eu/ .
  18. European Union, Regional Policy, Guide to Cost Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects, July2008.
  19. C. Eijgenraam, C. Koopmans, P. Tang, and A. Verster, Evaluatie van Infrastruurprojecten. Leidraad voor Kosten-Batenanalyse. Den Haag: CPB, 2000.
  20. B. T. Olsen and K. Stordahl, “Models for forecasting cost evolution of components and technologies,” Telektronikk, vol.  4, pp. 138–144, 2004.
  21. Eurostat, “Labour costs in the EU27,” Eurostat news release, Apr.2013 [Online]. Available: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/3-10042013-AP/EN/3-10042013-AP-EN.PDF .
  22. OfCom, Communications Market Report, Aug.4, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/cmr/cmr11/UK_CMR_2011_FINAL.pdf .
  23. Bundesnetzagentur, “Pressemitteillung: Bundesnetzagentur gibt endgültige Genehmigung der Entgelte für die “letzte Meile” bekannt,” June17, 2011.
  24. OPTA, “Besluit Wholesale Price Cap 2009-2011 (WPC-IIa besluit),” , Dec. 16, 2009.
  25. A. Broberg, “Stockholm IT-infrastructure,” presented at the OASE Plenary Workshop, Stokab, Stockholm, Feb. 2011.
  26. “Reggefiber, KPN to adjust wholesale tariffs,” Telecompaper, Dec. 31, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.telecompaper.com/news/reggefiber-kpn-wholesale-to-adjust-fibre-tariffs--916449 .
  27. Reggefiber, Annex–Tarieven bij Overeenkomst inzakegebruik van passieve glasvezel-aansluitnetwerken, Version 2.4 [Online]. Available: http://www.eindelijkglasvezel.nl/tl_files/documents/Generiek%20ODF%20contract/Annex%20Tarieven%20bij%20ODF%20overeenkomst%20Reggefiber%20v2%204.pdf .
  28. O. Williamson, “The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach,” Am. J. Sociol., vol.  87, no. 3, pp. 548–577, 1981. [CrossRef]
  29. B. Flyvbjerg, M. Holm, and S. Buhl, “Underestimating costs in public works projects: Error or lie?” J. Am. Plann. Assoc., vol.  68, no. 3, pp. 279–295, 2002.
  30. W. Burger, The Reggefiber model: Key elements of Reggefiber’s strategy in The Netherlands, 2012.
  31. H. Väätämöinen, “What solution providers need to know about FTTH?” presented at the 5th BICSI Southeast Asia Conf., 2007.
  32. OASE, “Process modeling and first version of TCO evaluation tool,” [Online]. Available: http://www.ict-oase.eu/.
  33. OpenReach, “Physical infrastructure pricing” [Online]. Available: www.openreach.co.uk/orpg/home/products/pricing/loadPricing.do .
  34. FTTH Handbook, FTTH Council Europe, 2012.
  35. FTTH Council Europe, “FTTH infrastructure components and deployment methods,” 2007.
  36. H. Rood, “Very high speed broadband deployment in Europe: The Netherlands and Bulgaria compared,” in TPRC, 2010.
  37. M. Tahon, J. Van Ooteghem, K. Casier, S. Verbrugge, D. Colle, M. Pickavet, and P. Demeester, “Improving the FTTH business case—A joint telco-utility network rollout model,” Telecomm. Policy, to be published. [CrossRef]
  38. European Commission, Impact assessment accompanying the document: Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on measures to reduce the cost of deploying high-speed electronic communications networks–SWD 73 final, Mar.2013.
  39. A. Broberg, “Challenges for an open physical infrastructure provider,” presented at the ECOC Conf., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Sept. 2012.
  40. “Universal services and users’ rights” [Online]. Available: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/information_society/legislative_framework/l24108h_en.htm .

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited