OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking

  • Editor: Keren Bergman
  • Vol. 7, Iss. 5 — May. 1, 2008
  • pp: 496–512

Experimental evaluation of GMPLS enhanced routing for differentiated survivability in all-optical networks

Ricardo Martínez, Ramon Casellas, and Raül Muñoz  »View Author Affiliations


Journal of Optical Networking, Vol. 7, Issue 5, pp. 496-512 (2008)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JON.7.000496


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1016 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Future intelligent optical networks (IONs) are devised to support a wide variety of clients, each having their own reliability requirements, such as availability. These networks thus need to support differentiated recovery schemes fulfilling those requirements while achieving efficient network performance (e.g., resource usage). We specifically focus on dedicated path protection (DPP) and shared path protection (SPP) recovery within generalized multiprotocol label switching (GMPLS) all-optical networks. In this context, the standard GMPLS open shortest path first-traffic engineering (OSPF-TE) protocol does not convey the required routing information in order to achieve a desirable network performance. The novelty of this work is twofold. First, to present enhanced GMPLS routing approaches for both SPP and DPP recovery schemes that, besides maximizing resource usage, also address connection blocking mostly due to the wavelength continuity constraint. Second, to evaluate these implemented schemes in a real experimental ION named ADRENALINE testbed. A detailed description of the routing approaches along with their required extensions to current GMPLS OSPF-TE is provided. The experimental performance comparison is conducted considering three figures of merit: connection blocking probability, restoration overbuild, and connection setup delay. The evaluation of the aforementioned schemes may help network operators to select a survivability scheme for a given client.

© 2008 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(060.0060) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics and optical communications
(060.2330) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics communications
(060.4250) Fiber optics and optical communications : Networks
(060.4510) Fiber optics and optical communications : Optical communications

ToC Category:
Reliability Issues in Optical Networks

History
Original Manuscript: November 2, 2007
Revised Manuscript: March 14, 2008
Manuscript Accepted: March 27, 2008
Published: April 30, 2008

Virtual Issues
Reliability Issues in Optical Networks (2008) Journal of Optical Networking

Citation
Ricardo Martínez, Ramon Casellas, and Raül Muñoz, "Experimental evaluation of GMPLS enhanced routing for differentiated survivability in all-optical networks," J. Opt. Netw. 7, 496-512 (2008)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/jocn/abstract.cfm?URI=jon-7-5-496


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. R. Ramaswami, “Optical networking technologies: what worked and what didn't,” IEEE Commun. Mag. 44(9), 132-139 (2006). [CrossRef]
  2. G. Ellinas, J.-F. Labourdette, J. A. Walker, S. Chaudhuri, L. Lin, E. Goldstein, and K. Bala, “Network control and management challenges in opaque networks utilizing transparent optical switches,” IEEE Commun. Mag. 42(2), S16-S24 (2004).
  3. E.Mannie, ed., “Generalized multi-protocol label switching (GMPLS) architecture,” IETF RFC 3945 (Internet Engineering Task Force, 2004).
  4. K. Kompella and Y. Rekhter, “OSPF extensions in support of generalized multi-protocol label switching,” IETF RFC 4203 (Internet Engineering Task Force, 2005).
  5. L.Berger, ed., “Generalized multi-protocol label switching (GMPLS) signaling resource reservation protocol-traffic engineering (RSVP-TE) extensions,” IETF RFC 3473 (Internet Engineering Task Force, 2003).
  6. S. Ramamurthy, L. Sahasrabuddhe, and B. Mukherjee, “Survivable WDM mesh networks,” J. Lightwave Technol. 21, 870-883 (2003). [CrossRef]
  7. D. Harle, S. Albarrak, F. Ali, A. Urra, E. Calle, and J. L. Marzo, “Service level agreement framework for differentiated survivability in GMPLS-based IP-over-optical networks,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2007 (IEEE, 2007), pp. 2249-2256.
  8. J. Zhang and B. Mukherjee, “A review of fault management in WDM mesh networks: basic concepts and research challenges,” IEEE Netw. 18, 41-48 (2004).
  9. A. Fumagalli and L. Valcarenghi, “IP restoration vs. WDM protection: is there an optimal choice?” IEEE Netw. 14, 34-41 (2000).
  10. G. Li, D. Wang, C. Kalmanek, and R. Doverspike, “Efficient distributed restoration path selection for shared mesh restoration,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 11, 761-771 (2003).
  11. J. F. Labourdette, E. Bouillet, R. Ramamurthy, and A. A. Akyma, “Fast approximate dimensioning and performance analysis of mesh optical networks,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 13, 906-917 (2005). [CrossRef]
  12. H. Liu, E. Bouillet, D. Pendarakis, N. Komaee, J. F. Labourdette, and S. Chaudhuri, “Distributed route computation and provisioning in shared mesh optical networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 22, 1626-1639 (2004).
  13. R. Munoz, C. Pinart, R. Martinez, J. Sorribes, G. Junyent, M. Maier, and A. Amrani, “The ADRENALINE test bed: integrating GMPLS, XML and SNMP in transparent DWDM networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag. 43(8), S40-S48 (2005).
  14. R. Martínez, R. Muñoz, R. Casellas, J. Comellas, and G. Junyent, “Experimental shared path protection in distributed all-optical GMPLS-based networks,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on the Design of Reliable Communication Networks, DRCN'07 (2007).
  15. C. Ou, J. Zhang, H. Zang, L. H. Sahasrabuddhe, and B. Mukherjee, “New and improved approaches for shared-path protection in WDM mesh networks,” J. Lightwave Technol. 22, 1223-1232 (2004). [CrossRef]
  16. J. W. Suurballe, “Disjoint paths in a network,” Networks 4, 125-145 (1974).
  17. E. Oki, N. Matsuura, K. Shiomoto, and N. Yamanaka, “A disjoint path selection scheme with shared risk link groups in GMPLS networks,” IEEE Commun. Lett. 6, 406-408 (2002). [CrossRef]
  18. G. Bernstein, Y. Lee, D. Li, and W. Imajuku, “Routing and wavelength assignment information for wavelength switched optical networks,” IETF draft-bernstein-ccamp-wavelength-info-02 (work in progress) (Internet Engineering Task Force, 2008).
  19. D. Li, Y. Lee, and H. Gao, “Evaluation of possible interior gateway protocol extensions for wavelength switching optical networks,” IETF draft-li-ccamp-wson-igp-eval-00 (work in progress) (Internet Engineering Task Force, 2007).
  20. R. Munoz, R. Casellas, and R. Martinez, “An experimental signalling enhancement to efficiently encompass WCC and backup sharing in GMPLS-enabled wavelength-routed networks,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2008 (to be published).
  21. J.P.Lang, Y.Rekhter, and D.Papadimitriou, eds., “RSVP-TE extensions in support of end-to-end generalized multi-protocol label switching (GMPLS) recovery,” IETF RFC 4872 (Internet Engineering Task Force, 2007).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited