OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 72, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 1982
  • pp: 1090–1091

Long-wavelength limit of scattering from a lossy dielectric sphere

M. A. Box and Bruce H. J. McKellar  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 72, Issue 8, pp. 1090-1091 (1982)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.72.001090


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1165 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

It is shown that the cross section for scattering in the long-wavelength limit from a lossy dielectric sphere varies as λ-2 and not as λ-1, as is suggested in standard treatments of the subject. The λ-1 variation is in conflict with the analytic properties of the scattering amplitudes as a function of k = 2πλ-1, and this conflict is resolved when the wavelength dependence of the dielectric constant is taken into account.

© 1982 Optical Society of America

Citation
M. A. Box and Bruce H. J. McKellar, "Long-wavelength limit of scattering from a lossy dielectric sphere," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 1090-1091 (1982)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-72-8-1090


Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. H. C. van de Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles (Wiley, New York, 1964), Secs. 6.13, 10.3, and 14.21.
  2. M. Kerker, The Scattering of Light and Other Electromagnetic Radiation (Academic, New York, 1969), Sec. 3.9.2.
  3. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1975), Sec. 9.14.
  4. Ref. 1, Sec. 4.21, gives the classical derivation. Ref. 3, Sec. 9.14, gives a derivation that parallels more closely the quantum-mechanical optical theorem.
  5. See, e.g., R. G. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966), Sec. 4.2.2, especially Eq. (4.34), and the statement immediately following it. Note that Newton's Aii and the Si(0) of this Letter (and of Ref. 1) are related by Aii = ik-1Si(00), so in relating Newton's result for Aii to a statement about S(0) the terms real and imaginary and the terms even and odd must be interchanged.
  6. See, e.g., Ref. 3, Sec. 7.10. The fact that Im ∊(k) and Re S(0) are both odd functions of K is no accident. If we construct a material that is a dilute suspension of N of our scatterers per unit volume, the dielectric constant ∊¯ of that material is related to S(0) by ∊¯(k) = 1 + (4πNi/k2)S(0). That Im ∊¯ is odd in k implies that Re S(0) is odd and vice versa.
  7. See, e.g., Ref. 3, Sec. 7.10.
  8. Indeed, by using the dispersion relation for S(0) (e.g., Ref. 5), one can show by similar manipulations that [equation], where Im S¯(0, k′) = Im S(0, k′) - k3 limk′→0 [Im S(0, k′)/k3], exhibiting the λ-2 dependence of Ctot and identifying the coefficient in a different way. This and similar relations will be described in more detail elsewhere.9
  9. B. H. J. McKellar, M. A. Box, and C. Bohren, J. Opt. Soc. Am. (to be published).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited