OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 42, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 1952
  • pp: 540–543

Optics InfoBase > JOSA > Volume 42 > Issue 8 > Derivation of the Mass-Energy Relation

Derivation of the Mass-Energy Relation

HERBERT E. IVES  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 42, Issue 8, pp. 540-543 (1952)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.42.000540


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (456 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The mass equivalent of radiation is implicit in Poincaré’s formula for the momentum of radiation, published in 1900, and was used by Poincarén illustrating the application of his analysis. The equality of the mass equivalent of radiation to the mass lost by a radiating body is derivable from Poincaré’s momentum of radiation (1900) and his principle of relativity (1904). The reasoning in Einstein’s 1905 derivation. questioned by Planck, is defective. He did not derive the mass-energy relation.

Citation
HERBERT E. IVES, "Derivation of the Mass-Energy Relation," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 42, 540-543 (1952)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-42-8-540


Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. H. Poincaré, Arch. néerland. sci. 2, 5, 232 (1900).
  2. H. Poincaré, "L'etat actuel et l'avenir de la physique mathematique," Congress of Arts and Sciences, St. Louis, Sept. 24, 1904; first published in full in La Revue des Idées, 80, Nov. 15, 1904. For appreciations of the pioneer contributions of Poincaré to the principle of relativity, the formulation of the Lorentz transformations, and the momentum of radiation, see articles by W. Wien and H. A. Lorentz in Acta Math. 38 (1921). See also, Ives, "Revisions of the Lorentz transformations," Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 95, 125 (1951).
  3. H. E. Ives, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 34, 225 (1944).
  4. F. Hasenöhrl, Wien. Sitzungen IIa, 113 1039 (1904).
  5. F. Hasenöhrl, Ann. Physik, 4, 16, 589 (1905). Hasenöhrl noted that this increase of mass was identical with that found twenty years earlier by J. J. Thomson for the case of a charged spherical conductor in motion. For the transformation of the factor 43 to unity upon considering the effect of the enclosure (shell), see Cunningham, Thze Principle of Relativity (Cambridge at the University Press, London, 1914), p. 189.
  6. M. Planck, Sitz. der preuss. Akad. Wiss., Physik. Math. Klasse. 13 (June, 1907).
  7. W. Pauli, Jr., "Relativitätstheorie," Encyclopedia Math. Wiss. V-2, hft 4, 19, 679 (1920). Pauli assigns momentum to the body not by moving it but by observing it from a moving platform; however, the mathematical formulation is the same as in the treatment here given.
  8. J. Larmor, previously, in considering the case of a radiating body moving through space against the reaction of its own radiation, decided that it would continue at uniform velocity, by losing momentum, at the expense of mass E/c2.("On the dynamics of radiation," Proc. Intern. Congr. Math., Cambridge (1912), p. 213; and Collected Works (Cambridge University Press, London, England, 1920).
  9. R. Becker, Tzebrie der Electronen (B. G. Teubner, Leipzig, 1930–1933), p. 348.
  10. A. Einstein, Ann. Physik 18, 639 (1905).
  11. Reference 6, footnote on p. 566.
  12. My italics, H. E. I.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited