OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 38, Iss. 4 — Apr. 1, 1948
  • pp: 363–366

Visibility on Cathode-Ray Tube Screens: The Effects of Light Adaptation

R. M. HANES and S. B. WILLIAMS  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA, Vol. 38, Issue 4, pp. 363-366 (1948)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1630 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



An intensity modulated cathode-ray screen of the PPI type used in radar depends on differential brightness discrimination for detection of weak signals. The brightness quantities have been largely unknown, because of photometric difficulties, but it has commonly been assumed that dark-adaptation is required for efficient visual detection. Therefore, an experimenal test was undertaken of the effects of light- and dark-adaptation on the contrast threshold and on time required for detection of suprathreshold signals appearing on a typical screen (P7 phosphor). Adapting brightnesses ranged from zero to 2000 millilamberts (ml.). By special photometry, the four screen intensities used were estimated as ranging from 0.0001 ml. to 0.22 ml. Length of exposure to the brightest adapting light and the degree of contrast between signal and background were also varied. The lowest contrast thresholds and the shortest detection times were found to occur when the test and adapting illuminations were equal or nearly so. When the two illuminations were unequal, the loss in sensitivity was roughly in proportion to their difference. The optimal field brightness of the phosphor screen used was on the order of 0.1 ml. With this field the level of adaptation of the eye can be a relatively insignificant factor in radar detection, even of weak signals. Increasing values of signal contrast allow progressive reduction in detection delay after exposure to the highest brigh tness.

R. M. HANES and S. B. WILLIAMS, "Visibility on Cathode-Ray Tube Screens: The Effects of Light Adaptation," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 38, 363-366 (1948)

Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. S. B. Williams, N. R. Bartlett, and E. King, "Visibility on cathode-ray tube screens: screen brightness" (in preparation).
  2. K. J. W. Craik, J. Physiol. 92, 406 (1938).
  3. K. J. W. Craik, Brit. J. Psychol. 29, 252 (1939).
  4. W. D. Wright, J. Physiol. 83, 466 (1935).
  5. Charles Haig, J. Gen. Physiol. 24, 735 (1941).
  6. S. Hecht, C. Haig, and A. M. Chase, J. Gen. Physiol. 20, 831 (1937).
  7. J. Blanchard, Phys. Rev. 11, 81 (1918).
  8. E. Simonson, S. S. Blankstein, and E. J. Carey, Am. J. Ophthal. 29, 328 (1946).
  9. A. L. Sweet and N. R. Bartlett, "Visibility on cathoderay tube screens: Signals on a P-7 screen seen at different intervals after excitation," J. Opt. Soc. Am. (in press). This paper will show that the optimal portion of the scanning cycle is on or near the fluorescent sweep line for dim screens (bias 17 to 20 volts) but is several degrees behind the sweep line for brighter screens.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited