OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 43, Iss. 3 — Mar. 1, 1953
  • pp: 197–198

Luminance Thresholds for the Resolution of Visual Detail during Dark Adaptation

J. L. BROWN, C. H. GRAHAM, H. LEIBOWITZ, and H. B. RANKEN  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 43, Issue 3, pp. 197-198 (1953)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.43.000197


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (766 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Luminance thresholds for the visual resolution of various widths of alternating light and dark lines were determined at various times during dark adaptation. The finest gratings, representing high degrees of visual acuity, show only a single cone curve that drops from a high luminance threshold during the first moments of dark adaptation to a final steady level that is reached after about 7 to 10 minutes in the dark. Coarse gratings produce a duplex curve that shows an initial cone portion and a delayed rod portion. Visual acuity is a parameter that sets the position of a given curve on the log threshold axis. The higher the degree of resolution required, the higher the dark adaptation threshold. At a constant grating luminance, visual acuity rises rapidly to a maximum during dark adaptation; the higher the luminance, the earlier and more rapid the rise and the higher the maximum. Visual acuity increases at all dark adaptation times with increase in luminance.

Citation
J. L. BROWN, C. H. GRAHAM, H. LEIBOWITZ, and H. B. RANKEN, "Luminance Thresholds for the Resolution of Visual Detail during Dark Adaptation," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43, 197-198 (1953)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-43-3-197


Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. G. Wald and A. B. Clark, J. Gen. Physiol. 21, 93 (1937).
  2. D. E. Johannsen, J. Gen. Psychol. 10, 4 (1934).
  3. Hecht, Haig, and Chase, J. Gen. Physiol. 20, 831 (1937).
  4. C. P. Winsor and A. B. Clark, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 22, 400 (1936).
  5. Mote, Riopelle, and Meyer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 40, 584 (1950).
  6. Graham, Brown, and Mote, J. Exptl. Psychol. 24, 555 (1939).
  7. S. Hecht, Physiol. Rev. 17, 239 (1937).
  8. C. H. Graham and R. Margaria, Am. J. Physiol. 113, 299 (1935).
  9. E. Wolf and M. J. Zigler, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 40, 211 (1950).
  10. An experiment similar to the experiment herein reported came to the attention of the authors while this manuscript was in press: A. J. Marshall and R. H. Day, Australian J. Psychol. 3, 1 (1951). Discussion of this experiment will be presented in a subsequent report dealing with the effects of different preadapting luminances.
  11. S. Shlaer, J. Gen. Physiol. 21, 165 (1937).
  12. S. Hecht and S. Shlaer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 28, 269 (1938).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited