OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 47, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 1957
  • pp: 719–725

New Methods of Rating and Prescribing Magnifiers for the Partially Blind

LOUISE L. SLOAN and ADELAIDE HABEL  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA, Vol. 47, Issue 8, pp. 719-725 (1957)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1090 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The conventional formula for the increase in size of the retinal image provided by a simple magnifier is M=D/4. This formula is based on arbitrary assumptions as to the accommodative powers exerted when the observer views a near object with and without the magnifier. Since these assumptions do not apply in a majority of cases, the conventional ratings of magnification are of limited use in the prescribing of reading aids for patients with subnormal vision. More realistic formulas are proposed which are applicable to many special cases, and which take account of the fact that the increase in size of the retinal image may depend upon the way in which the magnifier is used.

It is shown that the dioptric power of the magnifier required by a given patient is determined primarily by (a) his visual acuity and (b) his near point of distinct vision. A simple test of near-acuity for meaningful text is described which gives direct and valid information as to the increase in size of the retinal image required for useful reading vision. Further studies are needed to determine the best method of measuring the accommodative powers of patients with subnormal vision.

LOUISE L. SLOAN and ADELAIDE HABEL, "New Methods of Rating and Prescribing Magnifiers for the Partially Blind," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 47, 719-725 (1957)

Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. Laurance Lionel, Visual Optics and Sight Testing (The School of Optics, Ltd., London, 1926), p. 448.
  2. V. J. Ellerbrock, Am. J. Optom. 31, 67–77 (1954).
  3. Arthur Linskz, Am. J. Ophthalmol. 40, 831–840 (1955).
  4. H. H. Emsley, Visual Optics (Hatton Press, Ltd., London, 1936), p. 87.
  5. See reference 4, p. 239.
  6. E. F. Fincham, Brit. Med. Bull. 9, No. 1, 18–21 (1953).
  7. R. Seitz, Klin. Monatsbl. Augenheilk. 127, 676–687 (1955).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited