OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 48, Iss. 10 — Oct. 1, 1958
  • pp: 726–730

Brightness and Visual Acuity with Intermittent Illumination

JACOB NACHMIAS  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 48, Issue 10, pp. 726-730 (1958)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.48.000726


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (636 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Data on perceived brightness and visual acuity were obtained under essentially identical conditions of steady and intermittent illumination, using long exposures (up to 45 sec) as well as brief ones (250 msec). Flicker frequencies down to 8 cps and light-time fraction to 0.083 were sampled. By taking into account the exact duration of the test exposures, a more general form of Talbot’s law was derived, which fits all the brightness matches obtained. When this new equation is used as a yardstick, intermittent illumination turns out to be less efficient than steady illumination so far as visual acuity is concerned for brief exposures. For long exposures it is more efficient, as was previously reported by Senders.

Citation
JACOB NACHMIAS, "Brightness and Visual Acuity with Intermittent Illumination," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 48, 726-730 (1958)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-48-10-726


Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. V. L. Senders, J. Exptl. Psychol. 39, 453–465 (1949).
  2. S. J. Geratewohl and W. F. Taylor, J. Exptl. Psychol. 46, 278–282 (1953).
  3. V. L. Senders, J. Exptl. Psychol. 47, 135–136 (1954).
  4. S. Hecht, Physiol. Rev. 17, 239–290 (1937).
  5. E. P. Hyde, Bull. Bur. Standards 2, 1 (1906).
  6. S. H. Bartley, J. Psychol. 32, 57–6295(11).
  7. R. H. Mitchell and L. H. Liandausky, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 45, 831–834 (1955).
  8. S. H. Bartley, J. Exptl. Psychol. 23, 313–319 (1938).
  9. S. Hecht, Handbook of General Experimental Psychology, edited by Murchison (Clark University Press, Worcester, Massachusetts, 1934), pp. 704–828.
  10. C. H. Graham and C. Cook, Am. J. Psychol. 49, 654–661 (1937).
  11. E. Davy, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 937–941 (1952).
  12. S. Hecht and E. U. Mintz, J. Gen. Physiol. 22,593–612 (1939). Actually, the authors assert that the resolution of a grating is limited by the grain of the retinal mosaic before an otherwise minimal value of ΔI/I is reached.
  13. R. W. Ditchburn, Research 9, 466–471 (1956).
  14. Riggs, Ratliff, Cornsweet, and Cornsweet. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43, 495–501 (1953).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited