OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 48, Iss. 6 — Jun. 1, 1958
  • pp: 392–405

Summated Response of the Retina to Light Entering Different Parts of the Pupil

JAY M. ENOCH  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA, Vol. 48, Issue 6, pp. 392-405 (1958)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1772 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Contradictory additivity data of previous investigators, defined as the summated response of the retina to light entering different parts of the pupil, have led to an intensive study of variables inherent in these measurements. The experimental results have demonstrated that the Maxwellian and the ordinary type of viewing may be used interchangeably in Stiles-Crawford and additivity effect experiments. The experiments conducted in this research have revealed that additivity data are affected by at least the following two factors: the Stiles-Crawford effect and the blur of the retinal image. When blur is eliminated in addivity studies, the Stiles-Crawford effect does not reduce perceived brightness as much as might be predicted. The blur effect, caused by ocular aberrations, spherical and chromatic aberrations in particular, is a variable dependent upon the observer. This variability is thought to account for the several discrepancies in the data found in the literature. Experiments concerning the effect of blur on perceived brightness have been completed. It was shown that blur reduces perceived brightness of a field, and the degree of the reduction is dependent upon the test method.

JAY M. ENOCH, "Summated Response of the Retina to Light Entering Different Parts of the Pupil," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 48, 392-405 (1958)

Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. W. W. Stiles and B. H. Crawford, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) B112, 428 (1933).
  2. Koomen, Skolnik, and Tousey, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 41, 80 (1951).
  3. Boynton, Enoch, and Bush, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 44, 875 (1954).
  4. P. Moon and D. E. Spencer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 34, 319 (1944).
  5. Y. LeGrand, Rev. opt. 2, 102–107 (1948).
  6. A. Arnulf, Comm. des Lab. de L'Inst. d'Opt. 1, 23 (1944).
  7. S. H. Bartley, Perceptual and Motor Skills 5, 199 (1955).
  8. L. T. Troland, Psych. Review 22, 167 (1951).
  9. L. T. Troland, J. Exptl. Psychol. 2, 1 (1917).
  10. J. M. Enoch, Summated Response of the Retina to Light Entering Different Parts of the Pupil, Ph.D. Dissertation (Ohio State University, 1956).
  11. G. Bocchino, Optica 1, 136 (1936).
  12. G. Toraldo di Francia, Atti Fond. G. Ronchi 2, 100 (1947).
  13. Ercoles, Ronchi, Toraldo di Francia, Optica Acta 3, 84 (1956). Contact authors for corrected data.
  14. L. Ronchi, Optica Acta 2, 47 (1955).
  15. H. Hartridge, Recent Advances in the Physiology of Vision (Blakiston Company Philadelphia, 1950), p. 88.
  16. A. Ivanoff, Rev. Opt. (1953).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited