OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 49, Iss. 6 — Jun. 1, 1959
  • pp: 556–559

Optimum Half-Shade Angle in Polarizing Instruments

SHINYA INOUÉ and CHARLES J. KOESTER  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 49, Issue 6, pp. 556-559 (1959)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.49.000556


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (483 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

For visual instruments employing polarized light, half-shade devices have long been used to increase the precision of analyzer settings. Also when an object of small birefringence is to be detected against a uniform background a bias retardation has been used to increase the contrast. Assuming that Weber’s law is valid and that the polarization of the instrument is not perfect, optimum values are calculated for the half-shade angle and the bias retardation. In each case the sensitivity is shown to increase roughly as the square root of the extinction factor, the extinction factor (E) being defined as the ratio of the maximum to the minimum flux transmitted by the analyzer. For an interference microscope with E=35 the optimum half-shade angle is 19.2°. For a polarizing microscope with E=104 the optimum half-shade angle and bias retardation are each 1.1°.

Citation
SHINYA INOUÉ and CHARLES J. KOESTER, "Optimum Half-Shade Angle in Polarizing Instruments," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 49, 556-559 (1959)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-49-6-556


Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. A. C. Hardy and F. H. Perrin, The Principles of Optics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1932), pp. 610, 611.
  2. H. G. Jerrard, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 38, 35 (1948).
  3. H. G. Jerrard, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 44, 289 (1954).
  4. L. C. Martin, Optical Measuring Instruments (Blackie and Son, Ltd., London, 1924), pp. 208–211, 246.
  5. G. Bruhat, Traité de polarimétrie (La Revue d'optique théorique et instrumentale, Paris, 1930), pp. 70–73.
  6. H. R. Blackwell, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 36, 624 (1946).
  7. S. Inoué, Exptl. Cell Research 3, 199 (1952).
  8. S. Inoué and W. L. Hyde, J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 3, 831 (1957).
  9. M. M. Swann and J. M. Mitchison, J. Exptl. Biol. 27, 226 (1950). See also W. J. Schmidt, Handbuch der Biologischen Arbeitsmethod, edited by E. Abderhalden (Urban and Schwarzenberg, Berlin, 1934), Sec. V, Part 10, p. 435.
  10. S. Inoué and K. Dan, J. Morphol. 89, 423 (1951).
  11. F. H. Smith, Research 8, 385 (1955).
  12. Lord Rayleigh [Scientific Papers (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1903), Vol. III, p. 140] has shown that for one wavelength any combination of linearly, circularly, and elliptically polarized light plus unpolarized light is equivalent to a mixture of elliptically polarized and unpolarized light. A slight extension of his work shows that for this most general case Eq. (2) is satisfied.
  13. Hecht, Peskin, and Patt, J. Gen. Physiol. 22, 7 (1938).
  14. Lamar, Hecht, Shlaer, and Hendley, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 37, 531 (1947).
  15. E. P. Clancy, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 42, 357 (1952).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited