OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 50, Iss. 4 — Apr. 1, 1960
  • pp: 328–331

Flicker between Different Brightness Levels as Determinant of the Flicker Fusion

ERNST SIMONSON  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA, Vol. 50, Issue 4, pp. 328-331 (1960)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (494 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



For investigation of flicker produced by phasic variations of the brightness level, an electronic flicker apparatus was developed for continuous variation of brightness, area, light-dark ratio, ambient light ratio, and monocular or binocular exposure. The Sylvania glow modulator tube is excited by a steady current and simultaneously by rectangular impulses, thus furnishing an ambient and a flickering light source which can be mixed at any ratio within the total light emission capacity. At the same total light emission (Talbot level), the following ratios of ambient light, in percent of the total emission were investigated with monocular presentation: 0, 25, 50, 75, 85, and 95, at two levels of total brightness. Visual field (1.5°) and time interval ratio 50:50 were kept constant. There was no difference in the subjective sensation of flicker at any ambient light ratio. There was a continuous drop of the fusion frequency of flicker with increasing ratio of ambient light in three subjects. The extreme ratios (zero and 95% ambient light) were tested in 173 subjects. The drop of the fusion frequency of flicker at 95% ambient light ratio was statistically highly significant at both brightness levels, but was more pronounced at the higher brightness. A hypothesis for this phenomenon is presented.

ERNST SIMONSON, "Flicker between Different Brightness Levels as Determinant of the Flicker Fusion," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 50, 328-331 (1960)

Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. E. Simonson and J. Brozek, Physiol. Revs. 32, 349 (1952).
  2. C. Landis, Physiol. Revs. 34, 259 (1954).
  3. N. Enzer, E. Simonson, and S. S. Blankstein, J. Lab. Clin. Med. 29, 63 (1944).
  4. T. C. Porter, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) B90, 313–329 (1902).
  5. H. E. Ives, and E. F. Kingsbury, Phil. Mag. 31 (Ser. 6), 290–321 (1916).
  6. H. E. Ives, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 6, 343–361 (1922).
  7. P. J. Bouma, Philips Tech. Rev. 6, 295 (1941).
  8. J. B. Collins and R. G. Hopkinson, Trans. Illum. Eng. Soc. 19, 135–167 (1954).
  9. H. de Lange Dzn, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 44, 380–389 (1954).
  10. W. J. Crozier, and E. J. Wolf, Gen. Physiol. 24, 505–534 (1941).
  11. F. H. Ireland, J. Exptl. Psychol. 4, 282–286 (1950).
  12. M. D. Vernon, Brit. J. Psychol. 24, 351–374 (1924).
  13. E. Simsonson, unpublished data.
  14. E. Simonson, Am. J. Ophthalmol. 47, 556–565 (1959).
  15. Credit is due C. W. Fritze for the circuit design and consultation which has made the development of FFF research work possible.
  16. C. Fritze and E. Simonson, Science 113, 547 (1951).
  17. R. Granit and P. Harper, Am. J. Physiol. 95, 211 (1930).
  18. C. H. Graham and R. Granit, Am. J. Physiol. 98, 664 (1931).
  19. Geldard, quoted by S. H. Bartley, Vision (D. Van Nostrand and Company, Princeton, New Jersey, 1941), p. 224.
  20. S. H. Bartley, Vision (D. Van Nostrand and Company, Princeton, New Jersey, 1941), p. 225.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited