OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 51, Iss. 2 — Feb. 1, 1961
  • pp: 123–129

Relation Between Surface Roughness and Specular Reflectance at Normal Incidence

H. E. BENNETT and J. O. PORTEUS  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA, Vol. 51, Issue 2, pp. 123-129 (1961)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (849 KB) Open Access

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Expressions relating the roughness of a plane surface to its specular reflectance at normal incidence are presented and are verified experimentally. The expressions are valid for the case when the root mean square surface roughness is small compared to the wavelength of light. If light of a sufficiently long wavelength is used, the decrease in measured specular reflectance due to surface roughness is a function only of the root mean square height of the surface irregularities. Long-wavelength specular reflectance measurements thus provide a simple and sensitive method for accurate measurement of surface finish. This method is particularly useful for surface finishes too fine to be measured accurately by conventional tracing instruments. Surface roughness must also be considered in precise optical measurements. For example, a non-negligible systematic error in specular reflectance measurements will be made even if the root mean square surface roughness is less than 0.01 wavelength. The roughness of even optically polished surfaces may thus be important for measurements in the visible and ultraviolet regions of the spectrum.

H. E. BENNETT and J. O. PORTEUS, "Relation Between Surface Roughness and Specular Reflectance at Normal Incidence," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 123-129 (1961)

Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. Lord Rayleigh, Nature 64, 385 (1901).
  2. F. Jentzsch, Z. tech. Physik 7, 310 (1926).
  3. H. Hasunuma and J. Nara, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 11, 69 (1956).
  4. W. E. K. Middleton and G. Wyszecki, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 47, 1020 (1957).
  5. R. S. Hunter, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 36, 178 (1946).
  6. J. Guild, J. Sci. Instr. 17, 178 (1940).
  7. E. A. Ollard, J. Electrodepositor's Tech. Soc. 24, 1(1949).
  8. J. Halling, J. Sci. Instr. 31, 318 (1954).
  9. R. W. Wood, Physical Optics (The Macmillan Company, New York, 1934), 3rd ed., p. 41.
  10. H. Davies, Proc. Inst. Elec. Engrs. 101, 209 (1954).
  11. Davies refers to this function as the autocorrelation function. However, we shall use the term autocovariance function as a more appropriate name when the function in question is not normalized. For a discussion of the properties of such functions see J. H. Laning, Jr., and R. H. Battin, Random Processes in Automatic Control (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1956); and R. B. Blackman and J. W. Tukey, The Measurement of Power Spectra (Dover Publications, New York, 1958).
  12. E. Engelhard, Natl. Bur. Standards Circ. No. 581, 1 (1957).
  13. H. E. Bennett and W. F. Koehler, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 50, 1 (1960).
  14. F. W. Preston, Trans. Opt. Soc. (London) 23, 141 (1922).
  15. W. F. Koehler and W. C. White, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 45, 1011 (1955).
  16. W. F. Koehler, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43, 743 (1953).
  17. S. Bochner and K. Chandrasekharan, Fourier Transforms (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1949), p. 67.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited