OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 52, Iss. 10 — Oct. 1, 1962
  • pp: 1174–1178

Effect of Temporal Overlap on Brightness Matching of Adjacent Flashes

DAVID H. RAAB and ELI OSMAN  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 52, Issue 10, pp. 1174-1178 (1962)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.52.001174


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (649 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Flashes having durations of 10, 20, 50, and 100 msec were matched in brightness to an adjacent 200-msec standard. When the standard and test stimuli terminated together, the results confirmed earlier demonstrations of the Broca—Sulzer phenomenon. Different functions relating the growth of brightness to duration were generated, however, when the flashes matched to each other had coincident onsets or coincident mid-durations. The matches made with stimuli terminating together were shown to exhibit transitivity: Targets which are as bright as a standard are approximately as bright as each other. Finally, an effect of relative luminance on apparent temporal position is described.

Citation
DAVID H. RAAB and ELI OSMAN, "Effect of Temporal Overlap on Brightness Matching of Adjacent Flashes," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 1174-1178 (1962)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-52-10-1174


Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. B. Hillman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 48, 422 (1958) and E. Baumgardt and B. Hillman, ibid. 51, 340 (1961) are the most recent of many studies of foveal and peripheral reciprocity relations.
  2. Y. LeGrand, Light, Colour and Vision (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1957), pp. 291–293.
  3. M. Alpern, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43, 648 (1953).
  4. W. McDougall, Brit. J. Psychol. 1, 151 (1904). McDougall's "indirect method" could be used only to determine the "action time" of a flash, i.e., that duration of stimulus which yields maximal brightness.
  5. D. Raab, E. Fehrer, and M. Hershenson, J. Exptl. Psychol. 61, 193 (1961).
  6. D. Raab and E. Fehrer, J. Exptl. Psychol. (to be published).
  7. D. Raab, Am. J. Psychol. 75, 298 (1962).
  8. S. S. Stevens, Am. J. Psychol. 69, 1 (1956).
  9. D. Raab, Science 135, 42 (1962).
  10. M. S. Katz, "The Perceived Brightness of Light Flashes," Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester (1959).
  11. M. A. Bills, Psychol. Monogr. 28, No. 5 (1920).
  12. W. H. Stainton, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 16, 26 (1928).
  13. R. M. Boynton, in Sensory Communication, edited by W. A. Rosenblith (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1961), p. 741.
  14. P. A. Kolers and B. S. Rosner, Am. J. Psychol. 73, 2 (1960).
  15. Let Δt= the onset asynchrony between the standard and variable flashes. Let d = the duration of the variable flash. The three conditions are then defined as follows: 1. Δt=0; 2. Δt=200-d; 3. Δt=100-½d.
  16. R. S. Woodworth and H. Schlosberg, Experimental Psychology (Henry Holt and Company, Inc., New York, 1954), revised ed., pp. 197–198.
  17. See reference 13, p. 742.
  18. Our equipment cannot generate luminances greater than 101 dB; below 73 dB, the test flash appeared too faint for positional judgments to be made.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited