OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 53, Iss. 12 — Dec. 1, 1963
  • pp: 1403–1408

Effect of Surface Damage on the Reflectance of Germanium in the 2650-10 000-Å Region

T. M. DONOVAN, E. J. ASHLEY, and H. E. BENNETT  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 53, Issue 12, pp. 1403-1408 (1963)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.53.001403


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1299 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

With the recent development of an electropolishing technique for producing optically smooth and flat surfaces with a minimum amount of surface damage, a quantitative study of the influence of surface damage and lattice disorder on the optical properties of semiconductors has become possible. In this investigation precise absolute specular reflectance measurements at normal incidence are reported for electropolished and mechanically polished germanium single crystals and for amorphous and polycrystalline germanium films in the 2650-10 000-Å wavelength range. The highest reflectance maxima and considerable structure were exhibited by the electropolished sample. Splitting of the 2.1-eV peak, which had previously been reported only for etched samples, was observed, and shoulders at 3.25 and 2.47-eV were found. The latter shoulder has apparently not been reported previously. The wavelength at which the 2.1-eV peak occurred shifted for the mechanically polished single crystal and for the polycrystalline film and disappeared entirely for the amorphous film. However the 4.4-eV peak, although changing greatly in magnitude, occurred at the same wavelength for all the samples tested. The results of the experiment show that the optical properties of this material are a strong function of the lattice disorder present and emphasize the importance of adequate sample preparation techniques if meaningful optical measurements are to be made.

Citation
T. M. DONOVAN, E. J. ASHLEY, and H. E. BENNETT, "Effect of Surface Damage on the Reflectance of Germanium in the 2650-10 000-Å Region," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 53, 1403-1408 (1963)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-53-12-1403


Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. T. M. Buck, The Surface Chemistry of Metals and Semiconductors (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1959), p. 107.
  2. The skin depth is sometimes defined as the distance beneath the surface at which the intensity of the incident light falls to 1/e of its initial value (see Ref. 3). However, since the field acting at the lattice sites in the crystal is determined by the amplitude of the E vector rather than the intensity, the measure of the distance from the surface at which the electromagnetic disturbance acts is more properly an amplitude function. The two definitions of skin depth differ by a factor of 2.
  3. F. Seitz, The Modern Theory of Solids (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1940), p. 642.
  4. R. J. Archer, Phys. Rev. 110, 354 (1958).
  5. J. R. Beattie and G. K. T. Conn, Phil. Mag. 46, 989 (1955).
  6. T. M. Donovan and B. O. Seraphin, J. Electrochem. Soc. 109, 877 (1962).
  7. The sources for these boules were Semimetals, Inc., Westbury, Long Island, New York, and Semi-Elements, Inc., Saxonburg, Pennsylvania.
  8. Tergidal, nonionic detergent, NP44, obtained from Union Carbide Chemicals Company, New York, 17, New York.
  9. No. 1800 lapmaster abrasive obtained from the Crane Packing Company, Morton Grove, Illinois, was used for the lapping operations.
  10. Polishing wheel and materials were obtained from Buehler, Ltd., Evanston, Illinois: Microcloth, Cat. No. 1576; Metadi fluid, Cat. No. 1542-2SS; polishing compound, Cat. No. 1544-AB.
  11. The electrolyte used consisted of KOH dissolved in Buehler Metadi fluid (50 g KOH, 250 ml fluid).
  12. G. R. Booker and R. Stickler, J. Electrochem. Soc. 109, 1167 (1962).
  13. H. E. Bennett, Jean M. Bennett, and E. J. Ashley, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 1245 (1962).
  14. H. E. Bennett and W. F. Koehler, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 50, 1 (1960).
  15. H. R. Philipp and E. A. Taft, Phys. Rev. 113, 1002 (1959).
  16. H. E. Bennett and J. O. Porteus, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 123 (1961).
  17. H. Ehrenreich, H. R. Philipp, and J. C. Phillips, Phys. Rev. Letters 8, 59 (1962).
  18. W. G. Spitzer and H. Y. Fan, Phys. Rev. 106, 882 (1957).
  19. If the correction for the increasing surface roughness present in films deposited at higher temperatures was not made, the observed reflectance maximum appeared to shift to longer wavelengths.
  20. J. Tauc and E. Antoncik, Phys. Rev. Letters 5, 253 (1960).
  21. L. M. Roth and B. Lax, Phys. Rev. Letters 3, 217 (1959).
  22. M. Cardona and H. S. Sommers, Jr., Phys. Rev. 122, 1382 (1961).
  23. H. R. Philipp, W. C. Dash, and H. Ehrenreich, Phys. Rev. 127, 762 (1962).
  24. J. C. Phillips, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 12, 208 (1960).
  25. V. S. Vavilov, A. A. Gippius, and M. M. Gorschkov, Zh. Tekhn. Fiz. 28, 254 (1958) [Engl. Transl. Soviet Phys.—Tech. Phys. 3, 230 (1958)].
  26. H. J. Queisser, J. Appl. Phys. 32, 1776 (1961).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited