OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 53, Iss. 12 — Dec. 1, 1963
  • pp: 1430–1436

Pupillary Response to Double-Pulse Stimulation; a Study of Nonlinearity in the Human Pupil System

FRANK H. BAKER  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA, Vol. 53, Issue 12, pp. 1430-1436 (1963)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (851 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The work here described attempts to locate anatomically and to clarify the nature of dominant nonlinear operators in the human pupillary system for reflex to light. For this work an apparatus was constructed capable of stimulating both eyes simultaneously and recording the pupil diameter of one eye. Short light flashes were used as the input stimulus, and the maximum change in pupil diameter was chosen as the amplitude of response. Results of the experiments (1) confirmed the loglike dependence of response on input-light-flash energy, (2) demonstrated a dependence of response amplitude on duration between pulses in the double-pulse stimulating situation, (3) established the equivalence of response to double-pulse inputs in the cases of monocular and binocular double-pulse presentations, and (4) determined for the monocular and binocular cases the dependence of response amplitude on the amplitude of the second pulse in a double-pulse presentation. The similarity of results of the monocular and binocular cases suggests that the dominating nonlinear operation occurs after the summation of signals from the two eyes. The dependence of response amplitude on duration between pulses is discussed in terms of its implication of central mechanisms.

FRANK H. BAKER, "Pupillary Response to Double-Pulse Stimulation; a Study of Nonlinearity in the Human Pupil System," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 53, 1430-1436 (1963)

Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. L. Stark and P. M. Sherman, J. Neurophysiol. 20, 17 (1957).
  2. J. Stegemann, Arch. Ges. Physiol. 264, 113 (1957).
  3. M. Clynes, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 92, 946 (1961).
  4. L. Stark and F. H. Baker, J. Neurophysiol. 22, 156 (1959).
  5. Note added in proof: L. Stark, Proc. Inst. Radio Engrs. 47, 1925 (1959).
  6. L. H. van der Tweel and J. J. D. van der Gon, Acta Physiol. Pharmacol. Neerl. 8, 52 (1959).
  7. S. A. Talbot, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Physics, Harvard, January 1938.
  8. Strictly speaking, a physical system is driven by a forcing function acting in time. It is only with acknowledged liberality that we adopt the convention calling energy=∫τ0F(t)dt the driving function for input flux, F, confined to sufficiently short durations, τ.
  9. G. Hakerem and S. Sutton, paper presented at the Second Pupil Colloquium, May 1962, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  10. K. Weiler, Untersuchungen der Pupille und der Irisbewegungen beim Menschen (Julius Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1910).
  11. S. H. Bartley, J. Exptl. Psychol. 32, 110 (1943).
  12. L. Bellarminow, Arch. Ges. Physiol. 37 (1885).
  13. H. K. Hartline, J. Cellular Comp. Physiol. 5, 229 (1934).
  14. J. C. Eccles and J. W. Magladerly, J. Physiol. (London) 90, 31 (1937).
  15. D. Whitteridge, J. Physiol. (London) 89, 99 (1937).
  16. I. H. Wagman and W. S. Battersby, Am. J. Physiol. 197, 1237 (1959).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited