OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 54, Iss. 12 — Dec. 1, 1964
  • pp: 1428–1433

Effect of a Thin Surface Film on the Ellipsometric Determination of Optical Constants

D. K. BURGE and H. E. BENNETT  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 54, Issue 12, pp. 1428-1433 (1964)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.54.001428


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (732 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The thin oxide film present on most metals and semiconductors is difficult to detect and, if uncorrected for, can cause serious errors in the ellipsometric determination of optical constants. The reflectance at normal incidence calculated from these incorrect optical constants will, in general, be higher than that measured experimentally for a film-covered sample. A comparison of the approximate, linear, thin-film relations of Drude and Archer with the exact equations shows that the Drude relations are more inaccurate than are usually reported; in some cases serious errors result for films as thin as 10 Å. Archer’s relations are more accurate than Drude’s in most cases. However, if either of these sets of relations is used to correct measured ellipsometric values to the no-film condition, considerable errors in determining the optical constants may occur even if the film thickness is known. The variation in the ellipsometric parameters ψ and Δ with angle of incidence cannot be used to determine the presence of a thin surface film, since calculations show that the variation of these parameters with angle of incidence for a film-covered surface is practically identical with that for a fictitious film-free surface with appropriate optical constants. Also, the requirement that Rs2= Rp at 45° angle of incidence is only marginally useful in detecting a surface film.

Citation
D. K. BURGE and H. E. BENNETT, "Effect of a Thin Surface Film on the Ellipsometric Determination of Optical Constants," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 1428-1433 (1964)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-54-12-1428


Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. P. H. Berning, G. Hass, and R. P. Madden, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 50, 586 (1960).
  2. O. S. Heavens, Optical Properties of Thin Solid Films (Butterworths Scientific Publications Ltd., London, 1955), p. 125.
  3. R. J. Archer, J. Electrochem. Soc. 104, 619 (1957).
  4. A. B. Winterbottom, Kgl. Norske Videnskab. Selskabs, Skrifter 1, 1 (1955).
  5. R. J. Archer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 970 (1962).
  6. A. Rothen, Rev. Sci. Instr. 16, 26 (1945); 28, 283 (1957).
  7. McCrackin, Passaglia, Stromberg, and Steinberg, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Std. (U. S.) 67A, 363 (1963).
  8. P. Theroux and R. C. Plumb, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 53, 1451 (1963).
  9. J. A. Berning and P. H. Berning, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 50, 813 (1960).
  10. The formulas as given in A.Vasicek, Optics of Thin Filmns (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1960), p. 315, are incorrect. The correct expressions are given by L. Tronstad (Ref. 11) with the additional correction that both expressions should be multiplied by n0 as noted by A. B. Winterbottom (Ref. 12). Unfortunately, typographical errors are also present in Winterbottom's published equations. The equations here have been slightly rearranged for greater clarity.
  11. L. Tronstad, Trans. Faraday Soc. 31, 1151 (1935).
  12. See Ref. 4, p. 40.
  13. R. J. Archer (private communication); the equations have been slightly rearranged for greater clarity.
  14. J. R. Partington, An Advanced Treatise on Physical Chemistry (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1953), Vol. IV, p. 506. The notation used by Partington differs from that used in this paper.
  15. A. Rothen and M. Hanson, Rev. Sci. Instr. 20, 66 (1949).
  16. I. N. Shklyarevskii and N. A. Nosulenko, Opt. i Spectroskopiya 12, 769 (1962) [English transl.: Opt. Spectry. 12, 435 (1962)].
  17. See Ref. 4, p. 42.
  18. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon Press, Inc., New York, 1959), p. 617.The notation used by Born and Wolf differs from that used in this paper.
  19. L. G. Schulz and F. R. Tangherlini, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 44, 362 (1954).
  20. R. J. Archer, Phys. Rev. 110, 354 (1958).
  21. M. A. Barrett, Norges Tekniske Hogskole, Trondheim, Norway (private communication).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited