OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 57, Iss. 3 — Mar. 1, 1967
  • pp: 416–420

Spectral-Sensitivity Functions for Homochromatic-Contrast Detection

DWIGHT A. BURKHARDT and PAUL WHITTLE  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA, Vol. 57, Issue 3, pp. 416-420 (1967)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (657 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Two methods of measuring foveal spectral sensitivity were compared: (1) the absolute-threshold method and (2) a homochromatic-contrast method. In the second method, the subject saw a fixed-contrast homochromatic stimulus consisting of a steady background field and a superimposed 32% increment flash. The overall radiance level of the stimulus was varied systematically to determine the minimum radiance required to detect the flash. The spectral-sensitivity curve obtained by this method was somewhat narrower than the curve obtained by the absolute-threshold method. The homochromatic-contrast method was also used for a retinal region 8° above the fovea. A curve resembling the common photopic curve was obtained. It is concluded that the homochromatic-contrast method may serve as a useful addition to the standard methods of spectral-sensitivity measurement.

DWIGHT A. BURKHARDT and PAUL WHITTLE, "Spectral-Sensitivity Functions for Homochromatic-Contrast Detection," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 416-420 (1967)

Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. W. S. Stiles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 45, 100 (1959).
  2. G. G. Heath, Science 128, 775 (1958).
  3. E. P. Johnson, L. A. Riggs, and A. M. L. Schick, in Clinical Electroretinography Supplement to Vision Research, Ed. by H. M. Burian and J. H. Jacobson (Pergamon Press, London, New York, 1966), p. 75.
  4. W. S. Stiles, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 127-B, 64 (1937).
  5. S. Hecht, J. C. Peskin, and M. Patt, J. Gen. Physiol. 22, 7 (1938).
  6. D. Dillon and R. T. Zegers, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 48, 877 (1958).
  7. Y. Hsia and C. H. Graham, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 38, 80 (1952).
  8. L. M. Hurvich and D. Jameson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43, 485 (1953).
  9. H. G. Sperling and W. G. Lewis, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 49, 983 (1959).
  10. H. G. Sperling and Y. Hsia, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 47, 707 (1957).
  11. W. S. Stiles, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 58, 329 (1944).
  12. L. C. Thomson, J. Physiol. 112, 114 (1951).
  13. G. Wald, Science 101, 653 (1945).
  14. G. Wald, Science 145, 1007 (1964).
  15. W. D. Wright, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 42, 509 (1952).
  16. S. Guth, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 718 (1965).
  17. R. M. Boynton, M. Ikeda, and W. S. Stiles, Vision Res. 4, 87 (1964).
  18. R. M. Boynton, S. R. Das, and J. Gardiner, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 539 (1966).
  19. It would be of interest to compare the extrafoveal results of the dark-adaptation method with those of the contrast-detection method, using the same subjects, to see if the relation between the two extrafoveal curves is the same as that found between the two types of foveal curves. This is in fact the case for a comparison across subjects which can be made with our parafoveal curves and the 8° parafoveal curve obtained by Wald13 with the dark-adaptation method.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited