OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 58, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 1968
  • pp: 1276–1281

Effects of Film Nonlinearities on Wavefront-Reconstruction Images of Diffuse Objects

J. W. GOODMAN and G. R. KNIGHT  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 58, Issue 9, pp. 1276-1281 (1968)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.58.001276


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (926 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A statistical analysis of the effects of film nonlinearities on wavefront-reconstruction images of diffuse objects is presented. Regardless of the particular nature of the nonlinearity, the image distortions are shown to consist of additive irradiance contributions which may be found as multiple autoconvolutions of the ideal image irradiance distribution produced by a linear film. The predictions of the general nature of the image distortions are supported by experimental evidence.

Citation
J. W. GOODMAN and G. R. KNIGHT, "Effects of Film Nonlinearities on Wavefront-Reconstruction Images of Diffuse Objects," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 1276-1281 (1968)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-58-9-1276


Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. D. Gabor, Nature 161, 777 (1948); Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A197, 454 (1949); Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) B64, 449 (1951).
  2. E. N. Leith and J. Upatnieks, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 1123 (1962); 53, 1377 (1963); 54, 1295 (1964).
  3. E. N. Leith, J. Upatnieks, and K. A. Haines, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 981 (1965).
  4. R. W. Meier, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 987 (1965).
  5. R. F. van Ligten, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1009 (1966).
  6. J. W. Goodman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 493 (1967).
  7. A. Kozma, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 428 (1966).
  8. A. A. Friesem and J. S. Zelenka, Appl. Opt. 6, 1755 (1967).
  9. G. W. Stroke, An Introduction to Coherent Optics and Holographzy (Academic Press Inc., New York, 1966), p. 116.
  10. G. R. Knight, Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1967 (University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mich.). 1276
  11. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 2nd (rev.) ed. (Pergamon Press, New York, 1964), p. 508.
  12. W. B. Davenport, Jr., and W. L. Root, Randomn Signals and Noise (McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1958), p. 288.
  13. D. Middleton, Introduction to Statistical Communication Theory (McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1960), Sec. 7.7.
  14. Reference 13, Sec. 9.1.
  15. Reference 12, P. 289.
  16. Here, as throughout this paper, we neglect the finite aperture of the hologram, concentrating our attention on nonlinear effects rather than on diffraction and its limitations of resolution.
  17. Reference 12, p. 281.
  18. J. W. Goodman and R. W. Lawrence, Appl. Phys. Letters 11, 77 (1967).
  19. J. H. Van Vleck and D. Middleton, Proc. IEEE 54, 2 (1967).
  20. Reference 12, p. 163.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited