OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 59, Iss. 9 — Sep. 1, 1969
  • pp: 1189–1194

Optimizing Czerny-Turner Spectrographs: A Comparison between Analytic Theory and Ray Tracing

JOSEPH READER  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 59, Issue 9, pp. 1189-1194 (1969)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.59.001189


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1033 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The analytic theory of aberrations has been used to derive an expression for the magnitude of the coma width of the image in the meridional plane in a Czerny-Turner spectrograph with unequal mirror radii. The calculated properties of a 4-m spectrograph with equal radii and a recently constructed 3.34-m spectrograph with unequal radii are compared with the results obtained by tracing individual rays. The agreement is excellent, in contrast to the results of Chandler [J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 895 (1968)]. The lateral position of the grating for complete elimination of coma found experimentally with the 3.34-m instrument is in fair agreement with the theory. A correction to the √3 longitudinal grating position is given for a Czerny—Turner spectrograph which results in a flatter focal surface.

© 1969 Optical Society of America

Citation
JOSEPH READER, "Optimizing Czerny-Turner Spectrographs: A Comparison between Analytic Theory and Ray Tracing," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 1189-1194 (1969)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-59-9-1189


Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. M. Czerny and A. F. Turner, Z. Physik 61, 792 (1930).
  2. G. Chandler, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 895 (1968).
  3. A. Shafer, L. Megill, and L. Droppleman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 879 (1964).
  4. H. G. Beutler, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 35, 311 (1945).
  5. G. Rosendahl, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 412 (1962).
  6. W. G. Fastie, U. S. Patent 3,011,391 (1961).
  7. S. A. Khrshanovskii, Opt. Spectry. (USSR) 9, 207 (1960).
  8. K. Mielenz, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Std. (U. S.) 68C, 205 (1964).
  9. The diameter of the camera mirror is determined by the requirement that the entire grating be visible from all points of the plate holder. This gives D>W cosβ + 2L(l-m/r).
  10. This change was necessitated by a statement in the Megill program which sets the direction cosines of the central ray relative to the x, y, and z axes equal to -1, 0, and 0, respectively. Thus, the central ray is assumed by the program to be parallel to the x axis. If the geometry is not changed, the calculated spot diagram and image width do not refer to rays which actually form the image. This is equivalent to tracing rays through a system that is different from the one specified by the input parameters.
  11. W. G. Fastie, private communication.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited