OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 60, Iss. 4 — Apr. 1, 1970
  • pp: 513–517

Figures of Merit for Holographic Storage Media

MARVIN KING  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 60, Issue 4, pp. 513-517 (1970)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.60.000513


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (560 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Figures of merit for comparing various holographic storage media are defined and discussed. These figures of merit are based on the dynamic range of the medium. Formulas for these figures of merit are derived for photographic film.

Citation
MARVIN KING, "Figures of Merit for Holographic Storage Media," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 60, 513-517 (1970)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-60-4-513


Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. G. W. Stroke, An Introduction to Coherent Optics and Holography (Academic Press Inc., New York, 1966), p. 116.
  2. L. J. Cutrona, E. Leith, C. Palermo, and L. Porcello, IRE Trans. IT-6, 139 (1964).
  3. D. Falconer, J. Soc. Phot. Sci. Eng. 10, 133 (1966).
  4. A. Kozma, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 428 (1966).
  5. A. Vander Lugt and R. H. Mitchel, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 372 (1967).
  6. J. W. Goodman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 483 (1967).
  7. A. Kozma, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 436 (1968).
  8. O. Bryngdahl and A. Lohmann, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 1325 (1968).
  9. The object length XB-XA must be no greater3 than (XB+XA)/3. This requirement is equivalent to limiting the fractional spatial-frequency bandwidth of the hologram to two thirds.
  10. Additional ghost images appear in the reconstruction but they may be shown to have negligible irradiances.
  11. A. A. Friesem, A. Kozma, and G. F. Adams, Appl. Opt. 6, 851 (1967).
  12. We assume, in this small-signal calculation, that the term (4H0/K1)[K2+3K3 (HR+3H0)]≪1 [see Eq. (5)].
  13. We note, however, that the effect of the assumption is to yield a value of Hmax that is somewhat larger than it ought to be. This, in turn, leads us to interpret Eq. (12) as an upper bound on dynamic range.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited