OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 60, Iss. 4 — Apr. 1, 1970
  • pp: 555–559

Spatial-Frequency Discrimination in Human Vision

FERGUS W. CAMPBELL, JACOB NACHMIAS, and JOHN JUKES  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 60, Issue 4, pp. 555-559 (1970)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.60.000555


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (671 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Subjects were presented with two gratings with different spatial frequencies and they were asked to discriminate one from the other. Their ability to discriminate between the gratings was found to depend primarily on the ratio of their spatial frequencies over a wide range of absolute frequency. At high spatial frequencies, discrimination deteriorates when differences of subjective contrast are eliminated.

Citation
FERGUS W. CAMPBELL, JACOB NACHMIAS, and JOHN JUKES, "Spatial-Frequency Discrimination in Human Vision," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 60, 555-559 (1970)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-60-4-555


Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. F. W. Campbell, G. F. Cooper, and Christina Enroth-Cugell, J. Physiol. (London) 203, 223 (1969).
  2. C. Blakemore and F. W. Campbell, J. Physiol. (London) 203, 237 (1969).
  3. C. Blakemore and P. Sutton, Science 166, 245 (1969).
  4. J. G. Robson and F. W. Campbell in Symposium on the Physiological Basis for Form Discrimination (Hunter Laboratory of Psychology, Brown University, Providence, R. I., 1964), p. 44.
  5. F. W. Campbell and J. G. Robson, J. Physiol. (London) 197, 551 (1968).
  6. C. H. Graham in Vision and Visual Perception, C. H. Graham, Ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1965), Ch. 15.
  7. A. Pantle and R. Sekuler, Science 162, 1146 (1968).
  8. F. W. Campbell, G. F. Cooper, J. G. Robson, and M. B. Sachs, J. Physiol. (London) 204, 120P (1969).
  9. F. W. Campbell and D. G. Green, J. Physiol. (London) 181, 576 (1965).
  10. F. W. Campbell, R. H. S. Carpenter, and J. Z. Levinson, J. Physiol. (London) 204, 283 (1969).
  11. Because, in our experiments, the subject was about equally often correct on the two types of trial, the normal deviates have a particular significance in the theory of signal detectability [See D. M. Green and J. A. Swets, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1966).] Let us suppose that the internal effect of the frequency of a grating can be represented by a random variable. Let us further suppose that, for a given frequency, the random variable is distributed normally, with only the mean of the distribution depending upon the frequency of the grating. Upon these assumptions, the normal deviate of correct responses is just half the value of the mean difference between the distributions generated on high- and low-frequency trials in units of their standard deviation.
  12. G. B. Henning, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 39, 336 (1966).
  13. G. B. Henning and S. L. Grosberg, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 1386 (1968).
  14. G. Fechner, Elements of Psychophysics, Trans. H. E. Adler (H. Holt, New York, 1966), p. 176.
  15. 15 B. Bourdon, La perception visuelle de l'espace (Schleicher Frères, Paris, 1902), p. 116.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited