OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 62, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 1972
  • pp: 990–998

Signal-Transfer Functions in Threshold and Suprathreshold Vision

GEORGE A. HAY and M. SUSAN CHESTERS  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA, Vol. 62, Issue 8, pp. 990-998 (1972)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1088 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



A model of threshold and suprathreshold vision in relation to variation of object size is proposed. An important factor in suprathreshold vision is the signal-contrast loss in optical and neural components; in threshold vision, an important additional factor is the manner in which the brain acts on retinal noise. The signal-contrast loss has been measured in terms of a suprathreshold signal-transfer function for circular signals. In threshold vision, the noise processes are shown to predominate and the signal-contrast losses to be insignificant. Therefore signal-transfer functions cannot be deduced solely from threshold measurements; indeed, peak performance in suprathreshold vision is reached at object size one-tenth that at threshold. In suprathreshold vision, performance is shown to depend on a balance between optical unsharpness and neural sharpening (lateral inhibition). Contrast loss due to neural unsharpness (summation) appears to be insignificant in foveal vision and only partially significant in peripheral vision. Hence neural properties such as transfer functions, receptive-field sizes, and the spatial extent of neural interactions cannot be deduced from over-all measurements on the eye without correction for optical unsharpness.

GEORGE A. HAY and M. SUSAN CHESTERS, "Signal-Transfer Functions in Threshold and Suprathreshold Vision," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 990-998 (1972)

Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. The term threshold vision here relates to simultaneous contrast or incremental (including decremental) threshold, although the concepts discussed may well apply also to absolute thresholds.
  2. G. A. Hay, Nature 211, 1380 (1966).
  3. Signal contrast at any stage in the visual process is here defined in the form C = | I1 - Io |/ Io, where Io and I1 are the mean luminances, brightnesses, pulse rates, etc., associated with the background and a specified part of the object detail, respectively.
  4. F. Ratliff, Mach Bands (Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1965).
  5. The present analysis refers to the steady-state sensation of natural vision in which the effects of temporal phenomena such as saccades are averaged.
  6. O. Dupuy, Vision Res. 8, 1507 (1968).
  7. R. H. Morgan, Am. J. Roentgenol. 93, 982 (1965).
  8. Hl. de Vries, Physica 10, 553 (1943).
  9. A. Rose, Proc. IRE, 30, 295 (1942).
  10. A. Rose, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 38, 196 (1948).
  11. H. R. Blackwell, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 36, 624 (1946).
  12. J. J. DePalma and E. M. Lowry, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 328 (1962).
  13. E. M. Lowry and J. J. DePalma, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 740 (1961).
  14. A. S. Patel and R. W. Jones, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 696 (1968).
  15. L. L. Sloan, Vision Res. 8, 901 (1968).
  16. J. Mandelbaum and L. L. Sloan, Am. J. Ophthalmol. 30, 581 (1947).
  17. O. Bryngdahl, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 811 (1966).
  18. N. W. Taylor, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 820 (1962).
  19. R. W. Gubisch, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 407 (1967).
  20. J. E. Dowling and B. B. Boycott, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) B166, 80 (1966).
  21. F. W. Campbell and R. W. Gubisch, J. Physiol. (London) 186, 558 (1966).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited