OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 63, Iss. 7 — Jul. 1, 1973
  • pp: 820–825

Alternating renewal model of photographic granularity

P. E. Castro, J. H. B. Kemperman, and E. A. Trabka  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 63, Issue 7, pp. 820-825 (1973)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.63.000820


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (512 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A crowded-monolayer emulsion is viewed in one dimension as an alternating renewal process. The model presented is sufficiently general to include the effects of arbitrary distributions of halide grain sizes and gap sizes and further arbitrary dependence of developability of the grains on grain size and exposure. In an example, we calculate the increase of granularity that accompanies the increased exposure latitude obtained by broadening the size distribution of maximally sensitized grains.

Citation
P. E. Castro, J. H. B. Kemperman, and E. A. Trabka, "Alternating renewal model of photographic granularity," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 63, 820-825 (1973)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-63-7-820


Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. E. A. Trabka, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 800 (1971).
  2. J. F. Hamilton, W. H. Lawton, and E. A. Trabka, in Stochastic Point Processes: Statistical Analysis, Theory and Applications, edited by P. A. W. Lewis (Wiley, New York, 1972), pp. 817–867.
  3. See J. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. II (Wiley, New York, 1966), Ch. XI, for modifications in the lattice case.
  4. Reference 3, p. 366.
  5. The Stieltjes convolution G * H(t) of two functions G(t), H(t) of locally bounded variation is defined as ∫-∞H (t - u) dG(u), where the integral is interpreted in the Lebesque-Stieltjes sense. When G,H vanish for negative arguments, this becomes ∫t0H (t - u) dG(u), again interpreted in the Lebesque—Stieltjes sense.
  6. In all Laplace-Stieltjes integrals, the functions are to be interpreted as vanishing for all arguments less than 0 and the integral replaced by an integral extending from - ∞ to + ∞.
  7. Reference 2, p. 849.
  8. Reference 1.
  9. E. F. Haugh, J. Photogr. Sci. 11, 65 (1963).
  10. W. H. Lawton, E. A. Trabka, and D. R. Wilder, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 65, 659 (1972).
  11. Reference 3, p. 355.
  12. Reference 3, p. 182.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited