OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 65, Iss. 10 — Oct. 1, 1975
  • pp: 1114–1120

Instrument myopia

Robert T. Hennessyt  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA, Vol. 65, Issue 10, pp. 1114-1120 (1975)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (982 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The basis for instrument myopia, the tendency to accommodate inappropriately while viewing through an optical instrument, was investigated in three experiments. The first demonstrated that the distance of a peripheral surround, analogous to a field stop, influences accommodation but that the magnitude of the effect cannot account for instrument myopia. The second experiment re-examined the hypothesis that perceived distance can affect accommodation. The data indicate that perceived distance is unlikely to influence accommodation and does not provide an explanation of instrument myopia. The last experiment tested the hypothesis that instrument myopia is a manifestation of the return of accommodation to an intermediate state of rest or equilibrium in the absence of an adequate stimulus for accommodation. Implications of the intermediate-resting-state hypothesis are discussed.

Robert T. Hennessyt, "Instrument myopia," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 65, 1114-1120 (1975)

Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. R. A. Moses, Adler's Physiology of the Eye (Mosby, St. Louis, 1970).
  2. F. W. Campbell, J. Physiol. 123, 357 (1954).
  3. O. W. Richards, Am. J. Optom. 49, 539 (1972).
  4. H. Schober, H. Dehler, and R. Kassel, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 60, 103 (1970).
  5. T. Shimojima, Jpn. J. Clin. Ophthalmol. 21, 985 (1967).
  6. J. R. Baker, J. Roy. Microscopical Soc. 85, 231 (1966).
  7. W. H. Ittelson and A. Ames, J. Psychol. 30, 43 (1950).
  8. M. Nakabayashi and T. Katano, Folia Ophthalmol. Japonica 16, 884 (1965).
  9. H. W. Hofstetter, Am. J. Optom. 19, 66 (1942).
  10. G. Westheimer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 47, 714 (1957).
  11. R. T. Hennessy and H. W. Leibowitz, Percept. Psychophys. 10, 127 (1971).sss
  12. H. Schober, Optik 6, 282 (1954).
  13. R. T. Hennessy and H. W. Leibowitz, Behav. Res. Meth. Instrum. 4, 237 (1972). H. W. Leibowitz and R. T. Hennessy, Am. Psychologist 30, 349 (1975).
  14. H. A. Knoll, Am. J. Optom. 43, 415 (1966).
  15. W. R. Baldwin and W. B. Stover, Am. J. Opt. 45, 143 (1968).
  16. E. Ingelstam and S. I. Ragnarsson, Vision Res. 12, 411 (1972).
  17. When a positive lens is placed before the eye so that the posterior focal point of the lens coincides with the entrance pupil of the eye, the image of an object on the anterior optical axis of the lens retains the same angular size, regardless of the distance of the object. Also, relatively small displacements of the object cause its image to move over a wide range of distances. This principle was first pointed out by Badal. For further elaboration, see K. N. Ogle, Optics, 2nd ed. (Thomas, Springfield, Ill., 1968), p. 226.
  18. In all of the reported measurements of refractive state, axial chromatic aberration associated with the wavelength of the laser light was corrected to 560 nm, using the data of Bedford and Wyszecki [R. E. Bedford and G. Wyszecki, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 564 (1967)].
  19. E. F. Fincham, Br. J. Ophthalmol. 35, 381 (1951).
  20. F. Toates, Physiol. Rev. 52, 828 (1972).
  21. R. T. Hennessy and H. W. Leibowitz, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 60, 1700 (1970).
  22. W. H. Ittelson, Visual Space Perception (Springer, New York, 1960), p. 69.
  23. J. M. Otero, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 41, 942 (1951).
  24. M. W. Morgan, Am. J. Optom. 34, 347 (1957).
  25. H. W. Leibowitz, R. T. Hennessy, and D. A. Owens, Psychologia 18, Sept. (1975).
  26. S. M. Luria and J. S. Kinney, Percept. Psychophys. 11, 437 (1972).
  27. W. N. Charman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 102 (1974).
  28. K. Ogle and J. Schwartz, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 49, 273 (1959).
  29. F. Campbell, Opt. Acta 4, 157 (1957).
  30. H. Ripps, N. Chin, I. Siegel and G. Breinin, Inves. Ophthal. 1, 127 (1962).
  31. Y. LeGrand, Form and Space Vision (Indiana U. P., Bloomington, Ind., 1967).
  32. W. J. Giese, J. Appl. Psychol. 30, 91 (1946).
  33. G. Westheimer and S. Blair, Vision Res. 13, 1035 (1973).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited