OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 66, Iss. 11 — Nov. 1, 1976
  • pp: 1290–1294

Speckle-free rear-projection screen using two close screens in slow relative motion

Eric G. Rawson, Antonio B. Nafarrate, Robert E. Norton, and Joseph W. Goodman  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA, Vol. 66, Issue 11, pp. 1290-1294 (1976)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (709 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Speckle in rear-projection screens, such as those used in microfiche viewers, reduces resolution and can cause viewer fatigue. Many speckle-reduction techniques have been tried with varying degrees of success, including rapid movement of a single screen in its plane, the use of two stationary spaced screens, liquid-crystal screens, and the use of two closely spaced screens in slow relative orbital motion. We describe a simplified, two-screen support that permits only linear screen motion, and show that such motion provides total speckle elimination. An analysis of speckle in such screens is presented which accounts for the observed remarkable sensitivity of the speckle pattern to minute screen displacements. To confirm this analysis we have measured the speckle pattern’s correlation as a function of screen displacement using the speckle interferometry method of Françon. We consider the effects of a spatially and spectrally extended incandescent light source, and conclude that these effects are negligible in our application compared to the effect of screen motion. We show that these three speckle-reducing effects (screen motion, spatial extent of the source, and spectral extent of the source) can be considered together by introducing the notion of space-time correlation cells.

© 1976 Optical Society of America

Eric G. Rawson, Antonio B. Nafarrate, Robert E. Norton, and Joseph W. Goodman, "Speckle-free rear-projection screen using two close screens in slow relative motion," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 1290-1294 (1976)

Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. N. H. Mason, British Patent No. 590, 981 (1947).
  2. C. E. Hauber and R. E. Kittredge, U. S. Patent No. 3,473, 862 (Oct. 21, 1969).
  3. D. B. Huber, U. S. Patent No. 3, 705, 757 (Dec. 12, 1972).
  4. N. George and A. Jain, Opt. Commun. 15, 71–75 (1975).
  5. C. E. Baker, U. S. Patent No. 3, 650, 608 (March 21, 1972).
  6. J. V. Cartmell and D. Churchill, U. S. Patent No. 3, 674, 338 (July 4, 1972).
  7. F. S. MacAdam and Taylor, Taylor & Hobson Ltd., British Patent No. 592, 815, (1947).
  8. I. Leifer, C. J. D. Spencer, W. T. Welford, and C. N. Richmond, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 1422–1423 (1961).
  9. R. R. Firth, U. S. Patent No. 3, 640, 602 (Feb. 8, 1972).
  10. R. N. Wolfe, U. S. Patent No. 3, 640, 602 (Feb. 8, 1972).
  11. E. G. Rawson and R. E. Norton, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 1401 (abstract) (1974).
  12. N. George and A. Jain, Appl. Opt. 12, 1202–1212 (1973).
  13. Xerox University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mich.
  14. Polacoat is a division of the 3M Co., 3M Center, St. Paul, Minn.
  15. Allied Chemical, Specialty Chemicals Div., Morristown, N.J. 07960.
  16. J. Dyson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 50, 519–520 (1960).
  17. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 4th ed. (Pergamon, New York, 1970), p. 521.
  18. M. Françon, Opt. Acta 20, (1973).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited