OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 66, Iss. 6 — Jun. 1, 1976
  • pp: 608–617

Theory of spatial-frequency filtering by the humap visual system. I. Performance limited by quantum noise

Alvin D. Schnitzler  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA, Vol. 66, Issue 6, pp. 608-617 (1976)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1337 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



A theory and model of the visual system are presented to explain the detection of static sinusoidal gratings near the threshold. The model incorporates a set of independent decision centers and associated photoreceptive fields (PRFs). The decision criterion value at each decision center is proportional to the standard deviation of the excitation current transmitted from a PRF to its associated decision center caused by quantum fluctuations in the absorption of light. It is well known that the spatial-frequency-response (SFR) function and the spatial-impulse-response (SIR) function of a photodetector are a Fourier transform pair. A systematic examination of the SIR and SFR functions of PRF configurations consisting of rectangular regions of alternately excitatory and inhibitory response reveals that modulation sensitivity of the visual system is explained at scotopic and photopic illuminance by a set of PRFs composed of a single excitatory region and a central excitatory region bordered by inhibitory regions, respectively. The complete model is shown to yield a high degree of conformity between theoretical and experimental threshold modulation curves.

Alvin D. Schnitzler, "Theory of spatial-frequency filtering by the humap visual system. I. Performance limited by quantum noise," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 608-617 (1976)

Sort:  Author  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. P. M. Duffieux and G. Lansraux, Rev. d' Opt. 24, 65 (1945); 24, 151 (1945); 24, 215 (1945).
  2. For a general review of spatial-frequency-response characteristics, see L. Levi, Progress in Optics VIII, edited by E. Wolf (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970), p. 343.
  3. Recognition depends on detection of structural detail. For a useful rule of thumb expressed in terms of resolution frequency by J. Johnson see Perception of Displayed Information, edited by L. M. Biberman (Plenum, New York, 1973), p. 4.
  4. A. Van Meeteren, Visual Aspects of Image Intensification (Bronder-offset, Rotterdam, 1973), p. 77.
  5. F. W. Campbell and R. W. Gubisch, J. Physiol. (Lond.) 186, 558 (1966).
  6. D. H. Kelly, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 983 (1974).
  7. F. L. Van Nes and MI. Boaman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 401 (1967).
  8. O. H. Schade, Sr., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 46, 721 (1956).
  9. J. J. De Palma and E. M. Lowry, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 328 (1962).
  10. D. H. Kelly, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1628 (1966).
  11. J. G. Robson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1141 (1966).
  12. The author is indebted to one of the reviewers for calling attention to the sensitivity of the slope to temporal rate, shown by D. H. Kelly, Vision Res. 12, 89 (1972).
  13. F. W. Campbell and J. G. Robson, J. Physiol. (Lond.) 197, 551 (1968).
  14. To explain Mach band phenomena, G. V. Békésy [J. Opt. Soc. Am. 50, 1060 (1960)] proposed a spatial function, qualitatively similar to the SIR function deduced from threshold modulation data by Ref. 8, to describe the interaction of suprathreshold responses from proximate regions of the visual field at some highet level of the visual pathway.
  15. C. Blakemore and F. W. Campbell, J. Physiol, (Lond.) 203, 237 (1969).
  16. M. B. Sachs, J. Naclhmias, and J. G. .Robson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 1176 (1971).
  17. D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, J. Physiol. (Lond.) 154, 572 (1960).
  18. A. D. Schnitzler, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 63, 1357 (1973).
  19. For early references to the concept of a signal- to-noise limitation in visual detection, see Ref. 18.
  20. A. Papoulis, System and Transforms with Applications in Optics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).
  21. Y. W. Lee, Statistical Theory of Communications (Wiley, New York, 1960).
  22. R. A. Moses, Adler's Physiology of the Eye (Mosby, St. Louis, 1970).
  23. D. H. Kelly and R. E. Savoie, Percept. Psychophys. 14, 313 (1973).
  24. H. R. Blackwell, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 53, 129 (1963).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited