OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 68, Iss. 3 — Mar. 1, 1978
  • pp: 374–386

A visual system model and a new distortion measure in the context of image processing

William A. Pearlman  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 68, Issue 3, pp. 374-386 (1978)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.68.000374


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (4529 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Underlying many techniques of image restortation, quantization, and enhancement is the mathematically convenient, but visually unsuitable distortion measure of squared difference in intensity. Squared-intensity difference has an indirect phenomenological correspondence in a model of the visual system. We have undertaken, therefore, an experiment that derives a new distortion measure from an acceptable visual system model and compares it in a fair test against squared difference in intensity in an image restoration task. We start with an eye-brain system model, inferred from the works of current vision researchers, which consists of a bank of parallel spatial frequency channels and image detectors. From this model we derive a new distortion criterion that is related to changes in the per-channel detection probability and phase angle. The optimal linear (Wiener) filters for each distortion measure operate in turn on the same noisy incoherent images. The results show that the filter for the new distortion measure yields a superior restoration. It is more visually agreeable, more sharply detailed, and truer in contrast compared to the squared-difference filter, and impressive in its own right. Its mathematical properties suggest that significantly increased efficiency in the storage or communication of images may be gained by its use.

© 1978 Optical Society of America

Citation
William A. Pearlman, "A visual system model and a new distortion measure in the context of image processing," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68, 374-386 (1978)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-68-3-374


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. O. H. Schade, Sr., "Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 46, 721 (1956).
  2. T. G. Stockham, Jr., "Image processing in the context of a visual model," Proc. IEEE 60, 828–847 (1972).
  3. J. L. Mannos and D. J. Sakrison, "The effects of a visual fidelity criterion on the encoding of images," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 20, 525–536 (1974).
  4. C. F. Hall and E. L. Hall, "A nonlinear model for the spatial characteristics of the human visual system," IEEE Trans. Syst. Man and Cybern. 7, 161–170 (1977).
  5. F. W. Campbell and J. G. Robson, "Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings," J. Physiol. 197, 551–566 (1968).
  6. C. Enroth-Cugell and J. G. Robson, "The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat," J. Physiol. (London) 187, 517 (1966).
  7. F. W. Campbell, G. F. Cooper, J. G. Robson, and M. B. Sachs, "The spatial selectivity of visual cells of cat and the squirrel monkey," J. Physiol. (London) 204, 120 (1969).
  8. C. Blakemore and F. W. Campbell, "On the existence of neurons in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images," J. Physiol. (London) 203, 237–260 (1969).
  9. A. Pantle and R. Sekular, "Size-detecting mechanisms in human vision," Science 162, 1146–1148 (1968).
  10. P. Tynan and R. Sekular, "Perceived spatial frequency varies with stimulus duration," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 1251–1255 (1974).
  11. M. B. Sachs, J. Nachmias, and J. G. Robson, "Spatial-frequency channels in human vision," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 1176–1186 (1971).
  12. N. Graham and J. Nachmias, "Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: A comparison of single-channel and multiple-channel models," Vision Res. 11, 251–259 (1971).
  13. F. W. Campbell, J. Nachmias, and J. Jukes, "Spatial-frequency discrimination in human vision," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 60, 555–559 (1970).
  14. H. Mostafavi and D. J. Sakrison, "Structure and properties of a single channel in the human visual system," Vision Res. 16, 957–968 (1976).
  15. A. D. Schnitzler, "Image-detector model and parameters of the human visual system," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 63, 1357–1368 (1973).
  16. H. Richard Blackwell, "Neural theories of simple visual discrimination," J. Opt. Sc. Am. 53, 129 (1963).
  17. H. R. Blackwell and J. H. Taylor, in Proceedings of the NATO Seminar on Detection, Recognition, and Identification of Lineof- Sight Targets (unpublished); also, University of Michigan Engineering Research Institute Report No. 2455-10-F (1958) (unpublished).
  18. J. Johnson, Image Intensity Symposium, Fort Belvoir, Va., October 6–7, 1958, AD220160 (unpublished).
  19. A. D. Schnitzler, "Analysis of noise-required contrast and modulation in image-detecting and display systems," In Perception of Displayed Information, edited by L. M. Biberman (Plenum, New York, 1973).
  20. A. D. Schnitzler, "Theory of spatial-frequency filtering by the human visual system. I. Performance limited by quantum noise," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 608–617 (1976).
  21. The spatial bandwidth of the channels is in dispute. Generally, experiments without grating adaptation produce narrow channels and, with adaptation, wide channels. We assume here that adaptation has not taken place.
  22. W. A. Pearlman, "A limit on optimum performance degradation in fixed-rate coding of the Discrete Fourier Transform," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory IT-22, 485–488 (1976).
  23. W. A. Pearlman, Quantization Error Bounds for Computer-Generated Holograms, Technical Report No. 6503-1, Information System Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. August 1974 (unpublished).
  24. The DFT of the Gaussian noise process alone is exactly Gaussian with statistically independent nonredundant coefficients due to the linearity of the DFT.
  25. P. D. Welch, "The use of Fast Fourier Transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms," IEEE Trans. Audio and Electroacoust. 15, 70–73 (1967).
  26. G. Senge, Quantization of Image Transforms with Minimum Distortion, Technical Report No. ECE-77-8, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis., May, 1977 (unpublished).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited