OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 70, Iss. 12 — Dec. 1, 1980
  • pp: 1453–1458

Two-pulse discrimination and rapid light adaptation: Complex effects on temporal resolution and a new visual temporal illusion

Richard W. Bowen, Kathryn A. Markell, and Cecilia M. Schoon  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 70, Issue 12, pp. 1453-1458 (1980)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.70.001453


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (756 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Temporal resolution during rapid light adaptation was studied using a suprathreshold two-pulse discrimination paradigm with stimulus conditions modeled after the classic increment threshold experiments of B. H. Crawford. The two-pulse stimulus (1° diam, two 20-ms pulses separated by 40 ms) was presented before, during, and after a 6° diam, 500 ms background conditioning field, and discriminability was measured as d’ using signal detection methods. Discriminability is depressed at background field onset and offset, but increases during the exposure time of the background. Immediately following background offset, two-pulse discriminability is dramatically enhanced: two pulses are discriminated from one pulse with a d’ of 4 or more. When the two-pulse stimulus follows background offset by 80 to 240 ms, a novel temporal illusion occurs: a single pulse consistently appears as a double pulse. Several hypotheses for understanding these results are discussed.

© 1980 Optical Society of America

Citation
Richard W. Bowen, Kathryn A. Markell, and Cecilia M. Schoon, "Two-pulse discrimination and rapid light adaptation: Complex effects on temporal resolution and a new visual temporal illusion," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70, 1453-1458 (1980)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-70-12-1453


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. B. H. Crawford, "Visual adaptation in relation to brief conditioning stimuli," Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 134, 283–302 (1947).
  2. R. M. Boynton and G. Kandel, "On-Responses in the Human Visual System as a Function of Adaptation Level," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 47, 275–286 (1957).
  3. R. M. Boynton and J. B. Siegfried, "Psychophysical Estimates of On-Responses to Brief Light Flashes," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 720–721 (1962).
  4. R. T. Kintz and R. M. Boynton, "Temporal Summation During Backward Visual Masking," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 212–216 (1969).
  5. H. D. Baker, "Initial Stages of Light and Dark Adaptation," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 53, 98–103 (1963).
  6. W. S. Battersby and I. H. Wagman, "Neural limitations of visual excitability. I. The Time Course of Monocular Light Adaptation," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 49, 752–759 (1959).
  7. G. Sperling, "Temporal and spatial visual masking. I. Masking by Impulse Flashes," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 541–559 (1965).
  8. L. Ganz, "Temporal factors in visual perception," in Handbook of Perception, Vol. 5, Seeing, edited by E. C. Carterette and M. P. Friedman (Academic, New York, 1975), Chap. 6.
  9. L. H. Theodor, "The detectability of a brief gap in a pulse of light as a function of its temporal location within the pulse," Percept. Psychophys. 12, 168–170 (1972).
  10. E. Matin, "Light adaptation and the dynamics of induced tilt," Vision Res. 14, 255–265 (1974).
  11. A. Mahneke, "Foveal discrimination measured with two successive light flashes," Acta Ophthalmol. 36, 3–11 (1958).
  12. M. L. Kietzman, "Two-Pulse Measures of Temporal Resolution as a Function of Stimulus Energy," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 809–813 (1967).
  13. M. F. Lewis, "Two-Flash Thresholds as a Function of Luminance in the Dark-Adapted Eye," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 814–815 (1967).
  14. D. G. Purcell and A. L. Stewart, "The two-flash threshold: An evaluation of critical-duration and visual-persistence hypotheses," Percept. Psychophys. 9, 61–64 (1971).
  15. L. Matin, "Critical Duration, the Differential Luminance Threshold, Critical Flicker Frequency, and Visual Adaptation: A Theoretical Treatment," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 404–415 (1968).
  16. L. Matin, "Use of the glow modulator tube for visual research," Am. J. Psych. 77, 650–651 (1964).
  17. G. Westheimer, "The Maxwellian view," Vision Res. 6, 669–682 (1969).
  18. A 20-ms pulse was selected as the "noise" stimulus rather than an equal-energy 40-ms pulse because observers could easily discriminate a single 40-ms pulse on the basis of its greater brightness. The single 20-ms pulse and the pair of 20-ms pulses separated by 40 ms did not differ in brightness, so observers were compelled to base their judgments on temporal properties of the stimuli, rather than other phenomenal aspects.
  19. R. M. Boynton, W. R. Bush, and J. M. Enoch, "Rapid changes in foveal sensitivity resulting from direct and indirect adapting stimuli," J. Opt. Am. Soc. Am. 44, 56–60 (1954).
  20. The R measure is equivalent to the traditional measure β (responsebias) when the a priori probabilities of signal trial and noise trial presentation are equal. R was chosen over β because accurate estimates of β could not always be derived on the basis of 200 experimental trials. See W. A. Yost, "A forced-choice adaptive procedure for measuring auditory thresholds in children," Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. 10, 671–677 (1978) for a similar use of log R.
  21. L. G. Standing and P. C. Dodwell, "Retroactive contour enhancement: A new visual storage effect," Quart. J. Exp. Psych. 24, 21–29 (1972).
  22. E. Donchin and D. Lindsley, "Retroactive brightness enhancement with brief paired flashes of light," Vision Res. 5, 59–70 (1965).
  23. E. Donchin and D. Lindsley, "Visually evoked response correlates of perceptual masking and enhancement," EEG Clin. Neurophysiol. 19, 325–335 (1965).
  24. E. Pulos, J. E. Raymond, and W. Makous, "Transient sensitization by a contrast flash," Vision Res. 20, 281–288 (1980).
  25. E. Pulos and W. Makous, "Sensitization following offset of an annulus," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 1452(A) (1979).
  26. R. W. Bowen, K. A. Markell, V. Pappageorge, and F. Alfano, "Temporal resolution during transient light and dark adaptation," Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 18, 248–249 (1979).
  27. K. Dunlap, "The shortest perceptible time interval between two flashes of light," Psychol. Rev. 22, 226–250 (1915).
  28. S. H. Bartley and F. W. Wilkinson, "Certain factors in producing complexity of responses to a single pulse of light," J. Psychol. 9, 299–306 (1953).
  29. R. M. Boynton, "Discrimination of homogeneous double pulses of light," in Visual Psychophysics, Vol. VII/4, Handbook of Sensory Physiology, edited by D. Jameson and L. Hurvich (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972), Chap. 9.
  30. R. M. Springer, J. A. Deutsch, and G. Stanley, "Double flashes from single pulses of light," Percept. Psychophys. 18, 398–400 (1975).
  31. G. M. Shickman, "Brief illumination and visual temporal resolving power," Dissertation, Harvard University, 1960 (unpublished).
  32. K. J. W. Craik, "The effect of adaptation on differential brightness discrimination," J. Physiol. 92, 406–421 (1938).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited