OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 71, Iss. 4 — Apr. 1, 1981
  • pp: 448–452

Detection and discrimination of blur in edges and lines

James R. Hamerly and Charles A. Dvorak  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA, Vol. 71, Issue 4, pp. 448-452 (1981)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (455 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Observer-sensitivity to edge and line blur was examined by measuring just-noticeable differences of blur as a function of contrast, edge-profile shape, line width, and for white lines on black and black lines on white. At high luminance ratios, observers can discriminate a blurred image from an unblurred image when the edge-transition width (10–90% luminance points) is of the order of 25 sec of arc. However, when both images are blurred, they can be discriminated when they differ by as little as 5–10 sec of are.

© 1981 Optical Society of America

James R. Hamerly and Charles A. Dvorak, "Detection and discrimination of blur in edges and lines," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 448-452 (1981)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. M. W. Baldwin, "The subjective sharpness of simulated television images," Bell Syst. Tech. J. 19, 563–586 (1940).
  2. O. H. Schade, Jr., "Image gradation, graininess and sharpness in television and motion picture systems," J. Soc. Motion Pict. Telev. Eng. 56, 137–177 (1951).
  3. G. C. Higgins and L. A. Jones, "The nature and evaluation of the sharpness of photographic images," J. Soc. Motion Pict. Telev. Eng. 58, 277–290 (1952).
  4. G. C. Higgins and R. N. Wolfe, "The relation of definition to sharpness and resolving power in a photographic system," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 45, 121–129 (1955).
  5. M. A. Sproson, "Subjective sharpness of television pictures," Radio Eng. 35, 124–132 (1958).
  6. N. W. Lewis and T. V. Hauser, "Microcontrast and blur in imaging systems," J. Photogr. Sci. Eng. 10, 288–301 (1962).
  7. O. H. Schade, Jr., "An evaluation of photographic image quality and resolving power," J. Soc. Motion Pict. Telev. Eng. 73,81–119 (1964).
  8. E. H. Linfoot, Fourier Methods in Optical Image Evaluation (Focal, New York, 1964).
  9. E. M. Crane, "An objective method for rating picture sharpness: SMT acutance," J. Soc. Motion Pict. Telev. Eng. 73, 643–647 (1964).
  10. E. M. Granger and K. N. Cupery, "An optical merit function (SQF), which correlates with subjective image judgments," Photogr. Sci. Eng. 16, 221–230 (1972).
  11. R. G. Gendron, "An improved objective measure for rating picture sharpness: CMT acutance," J. Soc. Motion Pict. Telev. Eng. 82, 1009–1012 (1973).
  12. C. R. Carlson, "Thresholds for image sharpness," J. Photog. Sci. Eng. 22, 69–71 (1978).
  13. In active media, such as CRT displays, the parameter of interest is normalized luminance; in most cases involving passive media, such as paper, the luminance values may be taken as representing reflectance.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited