OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 72, Iss. 6 — Jun. 1, 1982
  • pp: 815–817

Sufficient condition for applying the ladder approximation to the multiple scattering of light in random media

Ronald L. Fante  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA, Vol. 72, Issue 6, pp. 815-817 (1982)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.72.000815


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (611 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We have obtained a sufficient condition under which the ladder approximation may be used to decouple the moment equations (e.g., the Bethe-Salpeter equation) that result when one analyzes the propagation of pptical waves in a randomly inhomogeneous medium. Simply stated, this means that the mean free path for multiple scattering by the inhomogeneities is required to be large in comparison with the size of the inhomogeneities.

© 1982 Optical Society of America

Citation
Ronald L. Fante, "Sufficient condition for applying the ladder approximation to the multiple scattering of light in random media," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 815-817 (1982)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josa/abstract.cfm?URI=josa-72-6-815


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. V. Tatarskii, The Effect of the Turbulent Atmosphere on Wave Propagation (National Technical Information Source, Springfield, Virginia, 1971); Secs. 60 and 61.
  2. Y. N. Barabanenkov et al., "Application of the theory of multiple scattering of waves to the derivation of the radiation transfer equation for a statistically inhomogeneous medium," Radiophys. Quantum Electron. 15, 1852–1860 (1972).
  3. A. Ishimaru, Wave Propagation and Scattering in Random Media (Academic, New York, 1978); see Chap. 14, where Twersky's theory is summarized.
  4. R. Fante, "Relationship between radiative transport theory and Maxwell's equations in random media," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 460–468 (1981).
  5. L. Tsang and J. Kong, "Wave theory for microwave remote sensing of a half-space random medium with three dimensional variations," Radio Sci. 14, 359–369 (1979).
  6. V. Frisch, "Wave propagation in random media," in Probabilistic Methods in Applied Mathematics, A. Barucha-Reid, ed. (Academic, New York, 1968).
  7. K. Furutsu, "Multiple scattering of waves in a medium of randomly distributed particles and derivation of the transport equation," Radio Sci. 10, 29–44 (1975).
  8. It is demonstrated in Refs. 1 and 2 that the approximation of Eq. (1) by formula (2) is equivalent to the ladder approximation to the Bethe-Salpeter equation. Consequently, we have given this decomposition the name ladder approximation.
  9. For example, when evaluating 〈EE*〉 by taking moments of the integral form of the wave equation, we find that we need to evaluate terms of the form 〈∊(r′)∊(r′)E*(r)〉, where ∊(r′) is the relative permittivity fluctuation at r′. If ∊ is a Gaussian random variable, the Novikov-Furutsu theorem (see Ref. 1) gives [equation].where δ/δ∊ is a variational derivative. It is readily demonstrated that δE(r)/δ∊(r″)= -k2E(r″G(r, r″), where G(r, r″) is therandom Green's function and satisfies {∇2+ k2[1 + ∊(r)]}G(r,r′)= δ(r - r′). Therefore 〈∊(r′)E(r′)E*(r)〉=-k2∋∋∞∞∋d3r″〈∊(r′)×(r)G(r, r)E(r)E*(r)+G*(r,r)E(r′)E*(r″)〉so we see that terms of the form of Eq. (1) must be evaluated.
  10. V. Feizulin and Y. Kravtsov, "Broadening of a laser beam in a turbulent medium," Radiophys. Quantum Electron. 10, 33–35 (1967).
  11. R. Lutomirski and H. Yura, "Propagation of a finite optical beam in an inhomogeneous medium," Appl. Opt. 10, 1652–1658 (1971).
  12. R. Fante, "Electromagnetic beam propagation in turbulent media: an update," Proc. IEEE 68, 1424–1443 (1980).
  13. R. Fante, "Some physical insights into beam propagation in strong turbulence," Radio Sci. 15, 757–762 (1980).
  14. It is demonstrated in Sec. 37 of Ref. 1 that the representation in formula (4) is valid provided that the spatial scale size of the inhomogeneities is large in comparison with the signal wavelength. In particular, it is shown that formula (4) approximately includes multiple small-angle scatterings. Clearly, however, formula (4) cannot be used in the limit when the inhomogeneities are small in comparison with a wavelength, because both formulas (3) and (4) assume that individual backscatterings are negligible. This is equivalent to Twersky's assumption (see Ref. 3, Section 14-1) that there are no propagation paths that go through a scatterer more than once.
  15. It is not necessary to assume that ø has zero mean. When ø has a nonzero mean we can simply lump it in with G0〈…〉 in Eq. (7). That is, 〈G(r′, r″)〉 = [G0(r′, r″)exp(i-〈ø〉)]exp(-½〈ø2 (r′, r″)〉), where ø is now the fluctuation of the phase about the mean value 〈ø〉
  16. V. Tatarskii, Wave Propagation in a Turbulent Medium (Dover, New York, 1967), Chap. 6.
  17. The geometric-optics method gives valid results for the real and imaginary parts of the phase over propagation paths less than l02λ, where l0 is the scale size of the smallest inhomogeneities and λ is the wavelength. For propagation paths that are large in comparison with l02λ, the geometric-optics method gives incorrect results for the imaginary part of ø but gives solutions for the real part of ø that are in agreement with results obtained by both the method of smooth perturbations and the Markov approximation method. Consequently, geometric optics gives useful results for the real part of ø even for large propagation lengths (i.e., paths large compared with l02λ).
  18. It is shown is Sec. 39 [see formula (23)] of Ref. 1 that the ray paths can be approximated by straight lines if 〈n2〉≪1.
  19. These conclusions do not hold in the backscatter cone (i.e., in a cone of angle L/R « 1 centered about θ + γ = 0 in Fig. 1). However, this is unimportant because (1) it represents only a small small fraction of the total integral over ρ and ρ′, and (2) backscattering usually is insignificant in the limit when l is larger than a wavelength, as we have assumed.
  20. R. Fante, "Mutual coherence function and frequency spectrum of a laser beam propagating through atmospheric turbulence," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 592–598 (1974); seeEq. (24).
  21. For the case when kl < 1 we expect that a sufficient condition for 〈Ei(r″)Ej*(r)Gkl(r′, r″)〉 〈(Ei (r″)Ej*(r)〉 〈Gkl(r′, r″)〉 is that 〈n2〉 ≪ 1, where Ei is the ith component of the vector E, Gij is the ij component of the Green's tensor, etc. (We did not need to consider this tensor case when kl »≫ 1 because cross polarization is then tinimportant.) Probably for kl sufficiently small in comparison with unity the ladder approximation is valid even for 〈n2〉 > 1, but we have been unable to prove this rigorously.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited