OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America

Journal of the Optical Society of America

  • Vol. 72, Iss. 7 — Jul. 1, 1982
  • pp: 888–892

Inferring local surface orientation from motion fields

D. D. Hoffman  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA, Vol. 72, Issue 7, pp. 888-892 (1982)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (576 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The problem of inferring local surface orientation from changing images is studied computationally by deriving conditions under which the motion information is sufficient for an information-processing system, biological or otherwise, to infer unique descriptions of the local surface orientation. The analysis is based on a shape-from-motion proposition, which states that, given the first spatial derivatives of the orthographically projected velocity and acceleration fields of a rigidly rotating regular surface, then the angular velocity and the surface normal at each visible point on that surface are uniquely determined up to a reflection. The proof proceeds in two steps. First it is shown that surface tilt and one component of the angular velocity are uniquely determined by the first spatial derivatives of the velocity field. Then it is shown that surface slant and the remaining two components of the angular velocity are uniquely determined if the first spatial derivatives of the acceleration field are also available.

© 1982 Optical Society of America

D. D. Hoffman, "Inferring local surface orientation from motion fields," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 888-892 (1982)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. W. Miles, "Movement interpretations of the silhouette of a revolving fan," Am. J. Psychol 43, 392–505 (1931).
  2. W. Metzger, "Tiefenerscheinungen in optischen Bewegungsfeldern," Psychol. Forsch. 20, 195–260 (1934).
  3. H. Wallach and D. O'Connell, "The kinetic depth effect," J. Exp. Psychol. 45, 205–217 (1953).
  4. J. Gibson and E. Gibson, "Continuous perspective transformations and the perception of rigid motion," J. Exp. Psychol. 54, 129–138 (1957).
  5. K. von Fieandt and J. Gibson, "The sensitivity of the eye to two kinds of continuous transformations of a shadow pattern," J. Exp. Psychol. 57, 344–347 (1959).
  6. E. Gibson, J. Gibson, O. Smith, and H. Flock, "Motion parallax as a determinant of perceived depth," J. Exp. Psychol. 8, 40–51 (1959).
  7. B. White and G. Mueser, "Accuracy in reconstructing the arrangement of elements generating kinetic depth displays," J. Exp. Psychol. 60, 1–11 (1960).
  8. B. F. Green, "Figure coherence in the kinetic depth effect," J. Exp. Psychol. 62, 272–282 (1961).
  9. M. Braunstein, "Depth perception in rotation dot patterns; effects of numerosity and perspective," J. Exp. Psychol. 64, 415–420 (1962).
  10. J. Gibson, "Research on the visual perception of motion and change," in Readings in the Study of Visually Perceived Motion, I. Spigel, ed. (Harper and Row, New York, 1965), pp. 125–146.
  11. G. Johannson, "Visual motion perception," Sci. Am. 232(6),76–88 (1975).
  12. S. Ullman, The Interpretation of Visual Motion (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1979).
  13. This eliminates single-frame information, such as texture gradients, from being a plausible explanation of this ability.
  14. G. Johansson, "Perception of motion and changing form," Scand. J. Psychol. 5, 181–208 (1964).
  15. C. Hay, "Optical motions and space perception-an extension of Gibson's analysis," Psychol. Rev. 73, 550–565 (1966).
  16. D. Hoffman and B. Flinchbaugh, "The interpretation of biological motion," Biol. Cybernet. 42, 195–204 (1982); also MIT AI Memo 608 (1980).
  17. Thus the goal is to provide a computational theory in the sense of D. Marr and T. Poggio, "From understanding computation to understanding neural circuitry," Neurol. Res. Prog. Bull. 15, 470–488 (1977).
  18. H. Longuet-Higgins and K. Prazdny, "The interpretation of a moving retinal image," Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 208, 385–397 (1980).
  19. J. Gibson, The Perception of the Visual World (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Mass., 1950).
  20. K. Nakayama and J. Loomis, "Optical velocity patterns, velocity-sensitive neurons, and space perception: a hypothesis," Percept. 3, 63–80 (1974).
  21. J. Koenderink and A. van Doorn, "Invariant properties of the motion parallax field due to the movement of rigid bodies relative to an observer," Opt. Acta 22, 773–791 (1975).
  22. J. Koenderink and A. van Dorn, "Local structure of movement parallax of the plane," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 717–723 (1976).
  23. J. Koenderink and A. van Doorn, "The internal representation of solid shape with respect to vision," Biol. Cybernet. 32, 211–216 (1979).
  24. J. Koenderink and A. van Doorn, "Exterospecific component of the motion parallax field," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 953–957 (1981).
  25. Actually the surface normal is expressed in terms of zx and zy in Eqs. (8)–(11). The transformations to slant σ and tilt τ are given in Fig. 2.
  26. K. Stevens, "Representing and analyzing surface orientation," in Artificial Intelligence: An MIT Perspective, P. Winston and R. Brown, eds. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1979), pp. 104–125.
  27. F. Attneave, "Representation of Physical space," in Coding Processes in Human Memory, A. W. Melton and E. Martino, eds. (Wiley, New York, 1972), pp. 283–306.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited