OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 11, Iss. 2 — Feb. 1, 1994
  • pp: 697–710

Measurements of light scattering by a series of conducting surfaces with one-dimensional roughness

M. E. Knotts and K. A. O’Donnell  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 11, Issue 2, pp. 697-710 (1994)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.11.000697


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1844 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Measurements of the polarization dependence of the coherent and diffuse scatter from a set of seven conducting surfaces with strictly one-dimensional roughness are presented. The surfaces have been fabricated in gold with photoresist techniques and have been accurately characterized with stylus profilometry. The standard deviation of surface height σ varies between 0.25 and 1.73 μm throughout the series of surfaces, but all have height statistics that are close to Gaussian and a correlation length that is nearly fixed at 3.3 μm. The polarization dependence of the scattered intensity is fully specified by the four unique elements of the Stokes matrix, which are determined from six intensities measured with different polarization conditions. In studies of the coherent scatter for wavelength 3.392 μm, large differences are found between the p- and s-polarized intensities, and it is shown that the relative phase of the p and s coherent amplitudes is strongly dependent on σ. In the case of diffuse scatter, the wide range of behavior exhibited by the scattered intensities and matrix elements is demonstrated for wavelengths 1.152 and 3.392 μm. The rise of backscattering enhancement and associated polarization effects are seen as σ increases, and it is shown that surfaces with surprisingly modest slopes may produce backscattering enhancement. At high angles of incidence, large differences between the p- and s-polarized diffuse intensities are observed.

© 1994 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: April 28, 1993
Revised Manuscript: August 5, 1993
Manuscript Accepted: August 18, 1993
Published: February 1, 1994

Citation
M. E. Knotts and K. A. O’Donnell, "Measurements of light scattering by a series of conducting surfaces with one-dimensional roughness," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 697-710 (1994)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-11-2-697


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. S. O. Sari, D. K. Cohen, K. D. Scherkoske, “Study of surface plasma-wave reflectance and roughness-induced scattering in silver foils,” Phys. Rev. B 21, 2162–2174 (1980). [CrossRef]
  2. J. M. Bennett, H. H. Hurt, J. P. Rahn, J. M. Elson, K. H. Guenther, M. Rasigni, F. Varnier, “Relation between optical scattering, microstructure and topography of thin silver films. 1: Optical scattering and topography,” Appl. Opt. 24, 2701–2711 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. J. M. Soto-Crespo, M. Nieto-Vesperinas, A. T. Friberg, “Scattering from slightly rough random surfaces: a detailed study on the validity of the small perturbation method,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 1185–1201 (1990). [CrossRef]
  4. A. R. McGurn, A. A. Maradudin, V. Celli, “Localization effects in the scattering of light from a randomly rough grating,” Phys. Rev. B 31, 4866–4871 (1985). [CrossRef]
  5. J. Renau, J. A. Collinson, “Measurements of electromagnetic backscattering from known, rough surfaces,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 44, 2203–2226 (1965).
  6. D. H. Hensler, “Light scattering from fused polycrystalline aluminum oxide surfaces,” Appl. Opt. 11, 2522–2528 (1972). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. P. Beckmann, A. Spizzichino, The Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves from Rough Surfaces (Pergamon, New York, 1963), Chap. 3, pp. 17–28.
  8. K. A. O’Donnell, E. R. Méndez, “Experimental study of scattering from characterized random surfaces,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1194–1205 (1987). [CrossRef]
  9. M. J. Kim, J. C. Dainty, A. T. Friberg, A. J. Sant, “Experimental study of enhanced backscattering from one- and two-dimensional random rough surfaces,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 569–577 (1990). [CrossRef]
  10. K. A. O’Donnell, M. E. Knotts, “Polarization-dependence of scattering from one-dimensional rough surfaces,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 1126–1131 (1991). [CrossRef]
  11. J. M. Soto-Crespo, M. Nieto-Vesperinas, “Electromagnetic scattering from very rough random surfaces and deep ref lection gratings,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 367–384 (1989). [CrossRef]
  12. A. A. Maradudin, T. Michel, A. R. McGurn, E. R. Méndez, “Enhanced backscattering of light from a random grating,” Ann. Phys. 203, 255–307 (1990). [CrossRef]
  13. Y. Q. Jin, M. Lax, “Backscattering enhancement from a randomly rough surface,” Phys. Rev. B 42, 9819–9829 (1990). [CrossRef]
  14. T. R. Michel, M. E. Knotts, K. A. O’Donnell, “Stokes matrix of a one-dimensional perfectly conducting rough surface,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 585–596 (1992). [CrossRef]
  15. J. M. Bennett, L. Mattsson, Introduction to Surface Roughness and Scattering (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1989), Chap. 3, pp. 13–37.
  16. W. S. Bickel, W. M. Bailey, “Stokes vectors, Mueller matrices, and polarized scattered light,” Am. J. Phys. 53, 468–478 (1985). [CrossRef]
  17. H. E. Bennett, J. O. Porteus, “Relation between surface roughness and specular reflectance at normal incidence,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 123–129 (1961). [CrossRef]
  18. K. E. Torrance, E. M. Sparrow, R. C. Birkebak, “Polarization, directional distribution, and off-specular peak phenomena in light reflected from roughened surfaces,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 916–925 (1966). [CrossRef]
  19. L. H. Tanner, M. Fahoum, “A study of the surface parameters of ground and lapped metal surfaces, using specular and diffuse reflection of laser light,” Wear 36, 299–316 (1976). [CrossRef]
  20. J. M. Elson, “Theory of light scattering from a rough surface with an inhomogeneous dielectric permittivity,” Phys. Rev. B 30, 5460–5480 (1984). [CrossRef]
  21. M. E. Knotts, T. R. Michel, K. A. O’Donnell, “Comparisons of theory and experiment in light scattering from a randomly rough surface,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 928–941 (1993). [CrossRef]
  22. J. C. Dainty, N. C. Bruce, A. J. Sant, “Measurements of light scattering by a characterized random rough surface,” Waves Random Media 3, S29–S39 (1991). [CrossRef]
  23. J. W. Goodman, “Statistical properties of laser speckle patterns,” in Laser Speckle and Related Phenomena, 2nd ed., J. C. Dainty, ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984), pp. 46–54.
  24. M. E. Knotts, T. R. Michel, K. A. O’Donnell, “Angular correlation functions of polarized intensities scattered from a one-dimensionally rough surface,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1822–1831 (1992). [CrossRef]
  25. See, for example, M. Zelen, N. C. Severo, “Probability functions,” in Handbook of Mathematical Functions, M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun, eds. (National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 1964), pp. 927–930.
  26. M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 6th ed. (Pergamon, New York, 1980), Chap. 10, pp. 554–555.
  27. G. S. Brown, “A stochastic Fourier transform approach to scattering from perfectly conducting randomly rough surfaces,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. AP-30, 1135–1144 (1982). [CrossRef]
  28. E. D. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids (Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1985), p. 295.
  29. S. Solimeno, B. Crosignani, P. Diporto, Guiding, Diffraction, and Confinement of Optical Radiation (Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1986), Chap. 21, pp. 208–210.
  30. Ref. 26, Chap. 13, pp. 615–624.
  31. Ref. 7, Chap. 5, p. 81.
  32. N. Garcia, E. Stoll, “Monte Carlo calculation for electromagnetic-wave scattering from random rough sufaces,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1798–1801 (1984). [CrossRef]
  33. See Ref. 12, Sec. 6.
  34. G. Brown, V. Celli, M. Haller, A. A. Maradudin, A. Marvin, “Resonant light scattering from a randomly rough surface,” Phys. Rev. B 31, 4993–5005 (1985). [CrossRef]
  35. Backscattering enhancement has been theoretically predicted for surfaces with much weaker slopes, but the physical mechanisms appear to be different from cases discussed here. See Ref. 4.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited