Abstract

A novel pedestal-plus-test paradigm is used to determine the nonlinear gain-control properties of the first-order (luminance) and the second-order (texture-contrast) motion systems, that is, how these systems’ responses to motion stimuli are reduced by pedestals and other masking stimuli. Motion-direction thresholds were measured for test stimuli consisting of drifting luminance and texture-contrast-modulation stimuli superimposed on pedestals of various amplitudes. (A pedestal is a static sine-wave grating of the same type and same spatial frequency as the moving test grating.) It was found that first-order motion-direction thresholds are unaffected by small pedestals, but at pedestal contrasts above 1−2% (5−10× pedestal threshold), motion thresholds increase proportionally to pedestal amplitude (a Weber law). For first-order stimuli, pedestal masking is specific to the spatial frequency of the test. On the other hand, motion-direction thresholds for texture-contrast stimuli are independent of pedestal amplitude (no gain control whatever) throughout the accessible pedestal amplitude range (from 0 to 40%). However, when baseline carrier contrast increases (with constant pedestal modulation amplitude), motion thresholds increase, showing that gain control in second-order motion is determined not by the modulator (as in first-order motion) but by the carrier. Note that baseline contrast of the carrier is inherently independent of spatial frequency of the modulator. The drastically different gain-control properties of the two motion systems and prior observations of motion masking and motion saturation are all encompassed in a functional theory. The stimulus inputs to both first- and second-order motion process are normalized by feed forward, shunting gain control. The different properties arise because the modulator is used to control the first-order gain and the carrier is used to control the second-order gain.

© 1996 Optical Society of America

Neural model of first-order and second-order motion perception and magnocellular dynamics

Aijaz A. Baloch, Stephen Grossberg, Ennio Mingolla, and C. A. M. Nogueira
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16(5) 953-978 (1999)

Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: review and update

Zhong-Lin Lu and George Sperling
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18(9) 2331-2370 (2001)

Interaction of first- and second-order direction in motion-defined motion

Johannes M. Zanker and Nicholas R. Burns
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18(9) 2321-2330 (2001)

Second-order motion perception in the peripheral visual field

Johannes M. Zanker
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14(7) 1385-1392 (1997)

Second-order motion perception in peripheral vision: limits of early filtering

Yi-Zhong Wang, Robert F. Hess, and Curtis L. Baker
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14(12) 3145-3154 (1997)