OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 13, Iss. 3 — Mar. 1, 1996
  • pp: 436–451

Luminosity thresholds: effects of test chromaticity and ambient illumination

Jon M. Speigle and David H. Brainard  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 13, Issue 3, pp. 436-451 (1996)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.13.000436


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (902 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Color constancy is often modeled on the assumption that color appearance in natural scenes is a function of the visual system’s estimates of surface reflectance. Some stimuli, however, do not look like illuminated surfaces. Instead, they appear to be self-luminous. We hypothesized that the appearance of luminosity occurs when the visual system estimates a reflectance spectrum that is outside the gamut of physically realizable surfaces. To test this idea, we measured luminosity thresholds as a function of stimulus chromaticity and illuminant spectral power distribution. Observers adjusted the luminance of a test patch until it just appeared self-luminous. The test patch was spot illuminated by a computer-controlled projection colorimeter viewed in an experimental room lit diffusely by computer-controlled theater lamps. Luminosity thresholds were determined for a number of test patch chromaticities under five experimental illuminants. The luminosity thresholds define a surface in color space. The shape of this surface depends on the illuminant. We were able to describe much of the luminosity threshold variation with a simple model whose parameters define an equivalent illuminant. In the context of our model, the equivalent illuminant may be interpreted as the illuminant perceived by the observer. As part of our model calculations we generalized the classic notion of optimal stimuli by incorporating linear-model constraints. Given the equivalent illuminant, the model predicts that a patch will appear self-luminous when it is not consistent with any physically realizable surface seen under that illuminant. In addition, we show that much of the variation of the equivalent illuminant with the physical illuminant can be modeled with a simple linearity principle. The fact that our model provides a good account of our data extends the physics-based approach to judgments of self-luminosity. This in turn might be taken as support for the notion that the visual system has internalized the physics of reflectance.

© 1996 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: June 7, 1995
Revised Manuscript: September 14, 1995
Manuscript Accepted: September 22, 1995
Published: March 1, 1996

Citation
Jon M. Speigle and David H. Brainard, "Luminosity thresholds: effects of test chromaticity and ambient illumination," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 436-451 (1996)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-13-3-436


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. D. H. Brainard, B. A. Wandell, E.-J. Chichilnisky, “Color constancy: from physics to appearance,” Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2, 165–170 (1993). [CrossRef]
  2. K. Buhler, “Gegenbemerkungen,” Psychol. Forsch. 5, 182–188 (1924), as discussed in Ref. 3. [CrossRef]
  3. G. Kreezer, “Luminous appearances,” J. Gen. Psychol. 4, 247–281 (1930). [CrossRef]
  4. R. M. Evans, “Fluorescence and gray content of surface colors,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 49, 1049–1059 (1959). [CrossRef]
  5. R. M. Evans, “Variables of perceived color,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 1467–1474 (1964). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. R. M. Evans, B. K. Swenholt, “Chromatic strength of colors: dominant wavelength and purity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 1319–1324 (1967). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. R. M. Evans, B. K. Swenholt, “Chromatic strength of colors. Part II. The Munsell system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 580–584 (1968). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. R. M. Evans, B. K. Swenholt, “Chromatic strength of colors. III. Chromatic surrounds and discussion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 628–634 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. S. Ullman, “On visual detection of light sources,” Biol. Cybern. 21, 205–212 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. F. Bonato, A. L. Gilchrist, “The perception of luminosity on different backgrounds and in different illuminations,” Perception 23, 991–1006 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. M. Ikeda, K. Motonaga, N. Matsuzawa, T. Ishida, “Threshold determination for unnatural color appearance with local illumination,” Kogaku 22, 289–298 (1993).
  12. M. Ikeda, S. Fukumura, N. Matsuzawa, T. Ishida, “Influence of surrounding visual information on the recognition threshold of local illumination,” Kogaku 23, 42–49 (1994).
  13. Our usage of the term luminosity threshold follows that of Kreezer3 and of Bonato and Gilchrist.10 The term luminosity is used in the literature both to describe physical properties of light14 and to describe perceptual experience.15 Ideal terminology would distinguish these two uses, but at present we feel that less confusion will be generated by our use of luminosity threshold than if we attempt to define new terminology.
  14. D. L. MacAdam, Color Measurement: Theme and Variations (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981).
  15. D. Judd, G. Wyszecki, Color in Business, Science, and Industry (Wiley, New York, 1975).
  16. R. N. Shepard, “The perceptual organization of colors: an adaptation to regularities of the terrestrial world?” in The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, J. Tooby, eds. (Oxford U. Press, New York, 1992).
  17. CIE, Colorimetry, 2nd ed. (Bureau Central de la CIE, Paris, 1986).
  18. D. H. Brainard, “Colorimetry,” in Handbook of Optics: Vol. 1. Fundamentals, Techniques, and Design, M. Bass, ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995).
  19. J. M. Speigle, D. H. Brainard, “Fluorescence thresholds depend on the illumination,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. Suppl. 35, 1656 (1994).
  20. L. T. Maloney, B. Wandell, “A computational model of color constancy,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Suppl. 26, 206 (1985).
  21. M. D’Zmura, G. Iverson, “Color constancy. I. Basic theory of two-stage linear recovery of spectral descriptions for lights and surfaces,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 2148–2165 (1993). [CrossRef]
  22. E. Hering, “Der Raumsinn und die Bewegungen des Auges,” in Handbuch der Physiologie, B.L. Hermann, ed. (Vogel, Leipzig, 1879), Vol. 3, Part 1, as discussed in Ref. 3 above.
  23. D. L. MacAdam, “The theory of the maximum visual efficiency of colored materials,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 25, 249–252 (1935). [CrossRef]
  24. A. L. Gilchrist, S. Delman, A. Jacobsen, “The classification and integration of edges as critical to the perception of reflectance and illumination,” Percept. Psychophys. 33, 425–436 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. A. L. Gilchrist, “Lightness contrast and failures of constancy: a common explanation,” Percept. Psychophys. 43, 415–424 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. G. Buchsbaum, “A spatial processor model for object colour perception,” J. Franklin Inst. 310, 1–26 (1980). [CrossRef]
  27. D. H. Brainard, W. T. Freeman, “Bayesian method for recovering surface and illuminant properties from photoreceptor responses,” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display V, B. E. Rogowitz, J. P. Allebach, eds., Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng.2179, 364–376 (1994). [CrossRef]
  28. D. Forsyth, “A novel algorithm for color constancy,” Int. J. Comput. Vision 5, 5–36 (1990). [CrossRef]
  29. G. D. Finlayson, “Color constancy in diagonal chromaticity space,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE, Cambridge, Mass., 1995), pp. 218–223.
  30. M. D’Zmura, G. Iverson, B. Singer, “Probabilistic color constancy,” in Geometric Representations of Perceptual Phenomena: Papers in Honor of Tarow Indow’s 70th Birthday, R. D. Luce, M. D’Zmura, D. Hoffman, G. Iverson, A. K. Romney, eds., (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1995).
  31. J. Cohen, “Dependency of the spectral reflectance curves of the Munsell color chips,” Psychon. Sci. 1, 369–370 (1964).
  32. D. B. Judd, D. L. MacAdam, G. W. Wyszecki, “Spectral distribution of typical daylight as a function of correlated color temperature,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 1031–1040 (1964). [CrossRef]
  33. L. T. Maloney, “Evaluation of linear models of surface spectral reflectance with small numbers of parameters,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 1673–1683 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. The other combinations of linear models we tried were (1) the CIE three-dimensional daylight model together with a three-dimensional linear model for the Munsell papers, (2) the CIE three-dimensional daylight model together with a six-dimensional linear model for the Munsell papers, and (3) a two-dimensional linear model for illuminants obtained from a principal-components analysis of our experimental illuminants together with the four-dimensional linear model for Munsell papers. These choices did not provide a better fit than the combination we used. We evaluated only choice (2) on a subset of our data, because it was computationally expensive to compute the model fits for a six-dimensional-surface linear model.
  35. K. L. Kelly, K. S. Gibson, D. Nickerson, “Tristimulus specification of the Munsell Book of Color from spectrophotometric measurements,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 33, 355–376 (1943). [CrossRef]
  36. D. Nickerson, “Spectrophotometric data for a collection of Munsell samples” (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1957; available from Munsell Color Company, Baltimore, Md.).
  37. V. Smith, J. Pokorny, “Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm,” Vision Res. 15, 161–171 (1975). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. P. DeMarco, J. Pokorny, V. C. Smith, “Full-spectrum cone sensitivity functions for X-chromosome-linked anomalous trichromats,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1465–1476 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. F. G. Ashby, W. W. Lee, “Predicting similarity and categorization from identification,” J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 120, 150–172 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. D. H. Brainard, B. A. Wandell, “Asymmetric color-matching: how color appearance depends on the illuminant,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1433–1448 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. E. Schrodinger, “Theorie der pigmente von grosster Leuchtkraft,” Ann. Phys. 62, 603–622 (1920), as discussed in Ref. 50 below. [CrossRef]
  42. S. Rosch, “Die Kennzeichnung der Farben,” Phys. Z. 29, 83–91 (1928), as discussed in Ref. 50 below.
  43. G. Wyszecki, W. S. Stiles, Color Science—Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1982).
  44. M. Richter, K. Witt, “The story of the DIN color system,” Color Res. Appl. 11, 138–145 (1986). [CrossRef]
  45. M. R. Pointer, “The gamut of real surface colours,” Color Res. Appl. 5, 145–155 (1980). [CrossRef]
  46. W. T. Freeman, D. H. Brainard, “Bayesian decision theory, the local mass estimate, and color constancy,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE, Cambridge, Mass., 1995), pp. 210–217.
  47. D. Marr, Vision, (Freeman, San Francisco, 1982).
  48. J. Little, C. Moler, matlab User’s Guide (The Math-Works, Natick, Mass., 1991).
  49. A. Grace, Optimization Toolbox for Use withmatlab User’s Guide (The MathWorks, Natick, Mass., 1990).
  50. G. Wyszecki, “Color Appearance,” in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, J. P. Thomas, eds. (Wiley, New York, 1986).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited