OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 15, Iss. 2 — Feb. 1, 1998
  • pp: 349–358

Double-cone internal reflection as a basis for polarization detection in fish

Iñigo Novales Flamarique, Craig W. Hawryshyn, and Ferenc I. Hárosi  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 15, Issue 2, pp. 349-358 (1998)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (595 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Some species of fish are able to discriminate, in addition to intensity and wavelength (color), the direction of polarization of visible light. Optical experiments on axially oriented retinal cones from trout and sunfish with use of two types of polarization microscope indicate anisotropic light transmission through paired cones. The measured linear birefringence of paired cone ellipsoids is consistent with the presence of membranous partitions. It is proposed that the partition between the two members of a paired cone, which often appears extensive and flat, functions as a dielectric mirror and that polarization-dependent reflection and refraction at this partition constitutes the underlying mechanism in the transduction of polarization into intensity variation at the photoreceptor’s outer segments. We support this hypothesis with linear birefringence and linear dichroism measurements, histological evidence, large-scale optical model measurements, and theoretical calculations based on Fresnel’s formulas.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(170.1420) Medical optics and biotechnology : Biology
(230.5440) Optical devices : Polarization-selective devices
(330.4270) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision system neurophysiology
(330.5310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - photoreceptors
(330.5370) Vision, color, and visual optics : Physiological optics
(330.7320) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision adaptation

Iñigo Novales Flamarique, Craig W. Hawryshyn, and Ferenc I. Hárosi, "Double-cone internal reflection as a basis for polarization detection in fish," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 349-358 (1998)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. S. R. Shaw, “Sense-cell structure and interspecies comparison of polarized-light absorption in arthropod compound eyes,” Vision Res. 9, 1031–1040 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. R. Wehner, “The perception of polarized light,” in The Biology of Photoreception, D. J. Cosens and D. Vince-Price, eds. (The Company of Biologists Ltd., Cambridge, UK, 1983), pp. 331–369.
  3. T. Labhart, “Polarization interneurons in the insect visual system,” Nature 331, 435–437 (1988). [CrossRef]
  4. S. M. Goddard and R. B. Forward, Jr., “The role of the underwater polarized light pattern in sun compass navigation of the grass shrimp Palaemonetes vulgaris,” J. Comp. Physiol. A 169, 479–491 (1991). [CrossRef]
  5. T. H. Waterman and R. B. Forward, Jr., “Field evidence for polarized light sensitivity in the fish Zenarchopterus,” Nature 288, 85–87 (1970). [CrossRef]
  6. C. W. Hawryshyn and W. N. McFarland, “Cone photoreceptor mechanisms and the detection of polarized light in fish,” J. Comp. Physiol. A 160, 459–465 (1987). [CrossRef]
  7. D. C. Parkyn and C. W. Hawryshyn, “Polarized light sensitivity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): characterization from multiunit ganglion cell responses in the optic nerve fibres,” J. Comp. Physiol. A 172, 493–500 (1993). [CrossRef]
  8. D. J. Coughlin and C. W. Hawryshyn, “A cellular basis for polarized-light vision in rainbow trout,” J. Comp. Physiol. A 176, 261–272 (1995). [CrossRef]
  9. I. Novales Flamarique and C. W. Hawryshyn, “Retinal development and visual sensitivity of young Pacific sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka),” J. Exp. Biol. 199, 869–882 (1996).
  10. K. Adler and J. B. Phillips, “Orientation in a desert lizard (Uma notata): Time-compensated compass movement and polarotaxis,” J. Comp. Physiol. A 156, 547–552 (1985). [CrossRef]
  11. D. H. Taylor and K. Adler, “Spatial orientation by salamanders using plane polarized light,” Science 181, 285–287 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. K. P. Able, “Skylight polarization patterns at dusk influence migratory orientations in birds,” Nature 299, 550–551 (1982). [CrossRef]
  13. F. R. Moore, “Sunset and the orientation behaviour of migrating birds,” Biol. Rev. 62, 65–86 (1987).
  14. S. R. Young and G. R. Martin, “Optics of retinal oil droplets: a model of light detection and polarization detection in the avian retina,” Vision Res. 24, 129–137 (1984). [CrossRef]
  15. J. J. Vos Hzn, M. A. J. M. Coemans, and J. F. W. Nuboer, “No evidence for polarization sensitivity in the pigeon electroretinogram,” J. Exp. Biol. 198, 325–335 (1995).
  16. D. A. Cameron and E. N. Pugh, Jr., “Double cones as a basis for a new type of polarization vision in vertebrates,” Nature 353, 161–164 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. I. Novales Flamarique and C. W. Hawryshyn, “No evidence of polarization sensitivity in freshwater sunfish from multi-unit optic nerve recordings,” Vision Res. 37, 967–973 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. C. W. Hawryshyn, M. G. Arnold, E. Bowering, and R. L. Cole, “Spatial orientation of rainbow trout to plane-polarized light: the ontogeny of E-vector discrimination and spectral sensitivity characteristics,” J. Comp. Physiol. A 166, 565–574 (1990). [CrossRef]
  19. W. N. Charman, “Reflection of plane-polarized light by the retina,” Brit. J. Physiol. Opt. 34, 34–49 (1981).
  20. T. H. Goldsmith and R. Wehner, “Restrictions on rotational and translational diffusion of pigment in the membranes of a rhabdomeric photoreceptor,” J. Gen. Physiol. 70, 453–490 (1977). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. D.-E. Nilsson, T. Labhart, and E. Meyer, “Photoreceptor design and optical properties affecting polarization sensitivity in ants and crickets,” J. Comp. Physiol. A 161, 645–658 (1987). [CrossRef]
  22. B. A. Fineran and J. J. A. C. Nicol, “Studies on the photoreceptors of Anchoa mitchilli and A. hepsetus (Engraulidae) with particular references to the cones,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 283, 25–60 (1978). [CrossRef]
  23. J. M. Enoch, “Retinal receptor orientation and photoreceptor optics,” in Vertebrate Photoreceptor Optics, J. M. Enoch and F. L. Tobey, eds. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981), pp. 127–168.
  24. R. A. Cone, “Rotational diffusion of rhodopsin in the visual receptor membrane,” Nature 236, 39–43 (1972).
  25. P. A. Liebman and G. Entine, “Lateral diffusion of visual pigment in photoreceptor disk membranes,” Science 185, 457–459 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. W. A. Shurcliff, Polarized Light, Production and Use (Harvard U. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1962), pp. 1–31.
  27. K. Engström, “Cone types and cone arrangements in teleost retinae,” Acta Zool. 44, 179–243 (1963).
  28. M. P. Rowe, N. Engheta, S. S. Easter, Jr., and E. N. Pugh, Jr., “Graded-index model of a fish double cone exhibits differential polarization sensitivity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 55–70 (1994). [CrossRef]
  29. I. Novales Flamarique, R. Oldenbourg, and F. I. Hárosi, “Transmission of polarized light through sunfish double cones reveals minute optical anisotropies,” Biol. Bull. 189, 220–222 (1995).
  30. E. R. Berger, “Subsurface membranes in paired cone photoreceptor inner segments of adult and neonatal Lebistes retinae,” J. Ultrastruct. Res. 17, 220–232 (1967).
  31. A. Dearry and R. B. Barlow, “Circadian rhythms in the green sunfish retina,” J. Gen. Physiol. 89, 745–770 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. W. K. Stell and F. I. Hárosi, “Cone structure and visual pigment content in the retina of goldfish,” Vision Res. 16, 647–657 (1976). [CrossRef]
  33. J. K. Bowmaker and Y. W. Kunz, “Ultraviolet receptors, tetrachromatic colour vision, and retinal mosaics in brown trout (Salmo trutta),” Vision Res. 27, 2101–2108 (1987). [CrossRef]
  34. C. W. Hawryshyn and F. I. Hárosi, “Spectral characteristics of visual pigments in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss),” Vision Res. 34, 1385–1392 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. R. L. Sidman, “The structure and concentration of solids in photoreceptor cells studied by refractometry and interference microscopy,” J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 3, 15–33 (1957). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. R. Oldenbourg and G. Mei, “New polarized light microscope with precision universal compensator,” J. Microsc. 180, 140–147 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. W. N. Charman and J. Tucker, “The optical system of the goldfish eye,” Vision Res. 13, 1–8 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. S. Inoué, Video Microscopy (Plenum, New York, 1989), pp. 477–510.
  39. M. A. Ali and M. Anctil, Retinas of Fishes: An Atlas (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976), pp. 12–16.
  40. The principal indices for a positive uniaxial crystal, such as quartz, would be larger for ne (slow axis) and smaller for no (fast axis) and would yield a positive retardance.
  41. A. L. Lehninger, Biochemistry, 2nd ed. (Worth, New York, 1975), p. 288. Lecithin, or phosphatidylcholine, is one of the most abundant phospholipids in higher plants and animals, and it is a major component of most animal cell membranes.
  42. R. J. Cherry and D. Chapman, “Optical properties of black lecithin films,” J. Mol. Biol. 40, 19–32 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. We consider the median angle to be the inclination of the median ray in a homogeneous cone of rays. For the case of numerical aperture 0.45 and medium refractive index of 1.334, the median angle is 14° and that of the extreme ray is ~20°.
  44. F. S. Sjöstrand, “Fine structure of cytoplasm: the organization of membraneous layers,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 31, 301–318 (1959). [CrossRef]
  45. D. A. Cameron and S. S. Easter, Jr., “The cone photoreceptor mosaic of the green sunfish, Lepomis cyanellus,” Visual Neurosci. 10, 375–384 (1993).
  46. R. Barer and S. Joseph, “Refractometry of living cells. Part I. Basic principles,” Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 95, 399–423 (1954).
  47. E. Hecht and A. Zajac, Optics, (Addison–Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1974), pp. 219–271.
  48. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 6th ed. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1980), p. 40. Equation (21) describes the two orthogonally polarized components of the reflected waves. We eliminated in these equations the angle of refraction with the aid of Snell’s law and then expressed them as reflection coefficients, as indicated in the text. Note that the parallel (∥) and perpendicular (⊥) polarization components are defined with respect to the plane of incidence. In the large-scale model, these correspond to the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively.
  49. M. F. Land, “The physics and biology of animal reflectors,” Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 24, 75–106 (1972). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. A. Nussbaum and R. A. Philips, Contemporary Optics for Scientists and Engineers (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1976), pp. 182–190.
  51. P. A. Liebman, W. S. Jagger, M. W. Kaplan, and F. G. Bargoot, “Membrane structure changes in rod outer segments associated with rhodopsin bleaching,” Nature 251, 31–36 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited