OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 16, Iss. 5 — May. 1, 1999
  • pp: 1005–1015

Cramér-Rao analysis of phase-diverse wave-front sensing

David J. Lee, Michael C. Roggemann, and Byron M. Welsh  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 16, Issue 5, pp. 1005-1015 (1999)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.16.001005


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (348 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Phase-diverse wave-front sensing (PDWFS) is a methodology for estimating aberration coefficients from multiple incoherent images whose pupil phases differ from one another in a known manner. With the use of previous work by other authors, the Cramér–Rao lower-bound (CRLB) expression for the phase diversity aberration estimation problem is developed and is generalized slightly to allow for multiple phase-diverse images, various beam-splitting configurations, and imaging of known extended objects. The CRLB for a given problem depends implicitly on the true underlying value of the aberration being estimated. Therefore we use numerical evaluation and Monte Carlo analysis of the PDWFS CRLB expressions. The numerical evaluation is performed on an ensemble of aberration phase screens while simulating a number of different imaging configurations. We demonstrate the use of average CRLB values as figures of merit in comparing these various PDWFS configurations. For simulated point-source imaging we quantify the effects of varying the amounts and the types of diversity phase and briefly address the issue of the number of diversity images. Our results show that there is a diversity defocus configuration that is optimal in a Cramér–Rao sense for estimating certain aberrations. We also show that PDWFS Cramér–Rao squared-error values can be orders of magnitude higher for imaging of an extended target object than those from a point-source target.

© 1999 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(000.5490) General : Probability theory, stochastic processes, and statistics
(030.6600) Coherence and statistical optics : Statistical optics
(070.2580) Fourier optics and signal processing : Paraxial wave optics
(100.5070) Image processing : Phase retrieval

Citation
David J. Lee, Michael C. Roggemann, and Byron M. Welsh, "Cramér-Rao analysis of phase-diverse wave-front sensing," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 1005-1015 (1999)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-16-5-1005


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. R. A. Gonsalves and R. Chidlaw, “Wavefront sensing by phase retrieval,” in Applications of Digital Image Processing III, A. G. Tescher, ed., Proc. SPIE 207, 32–39 (1979).
  2. J. R. Fienup, J. C. Marron, T. J. Schulz, and J. H. Seldin, “Hubble Space Telescope characterized by using phase-retrieval algorithms,” Appl. Opt. 32, 1747–1767 (1993).
  3. R. G. Paxman, T. J. Schulz, and J. R. Fienup, “Joint estimation of object and aberrations by using phase diversity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1072–1085 (1992).
  4. J. W. Goodman, Statistical Optics (Wiley, New York, 1985).
  5. J. D. Gaskill, Linear Systems, Fourier Transforms, and Optics (Wiley, New York, 1978).
  6. M. C. Roggemann and B. M. Welsh, Imaging through Turbulence (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1996).
  7. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).
  8. R. J. Noll, “Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 207–211 (1976).
  9. S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1993).
  10. R. G. Paxman and J. R. Fienup, “Optical misalignment sensing using phase diversity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 914–923 (1988).
  11. M. G. Lofdahl and G. B. Scharmer, “Wavefront sensing and image restoration from focused and defocused solar images,” Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser. 107, 243–264 (1994).
  12. D. L. Snyder and M. I. Miller, Random Point Processes in Time and Space (Springer, New York, 1991).
  13. D. L. Fried, “Least-square fitting a wave front distortion estimate to an array of phase-difference measurements,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 370–375 (1977).
  14. E. P. Wallner, “Optimal wave-front correction using slope measurements,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73, 1771–1776 (1983).
  15. B. M. Welsh, B. L. Ellerbroek, M. C. Roggemann, and T. L. Pennington, “Fundamental performance comparison of a Hartmann and a shearing interferometer wave-front sensor,” Appl. Opt. 34, 4186–4195 (1995).
  16. R. A. Gonsalves, “Fundamentals of wavefront sensing by phase retrieval,” in Wavefront Sensing, N. Bareket and C. L. Koliopoulos, eds., Proc. SPIE 351, 56–65 (1982).
  17. J. R. Fienup, “Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison,” Appl. Opt. 21, 2758–2769 (1982).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited