OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 16, Iss. 5 — May. 1, 1999
  • pp: 995–1004

Cone spacing and waveguide properties from cone directionality measurements

Susana Marcos and Stephen A. Burns  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 16, Issue 5, pp. 995-1004 (1999)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (628 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Reflectometric techniques estimate the directionality of the retinal cones by measuring the distribution of light at the pupil plane of light reflected off the bleached retina. The waveguide-scattering model of Marcos et al. [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2012 (1998)] predicts that the shape of this intensity distribution is determined by both the waveguide properties of the cone photoreceptors and the topography of the cone mosaic (cone spacing). We have performed two types of cone directionality measurement. In the first type, cone directionality estimates are obtained by measuring the spatial distribution of light returning from the retina with a single-entry pupil position (single-entry measurements). In the second type, estimates are obtained by measuring the total amount of light guided back through the pupil as a function of entry pupil position (multiple-entry measurements). As predicted by the model, single-entry measurements provide narrower distributions than the multiple-entry measurements, since the former are affected by both waveguides and scattering and the latter are affected primarily by waveguides. Measurements at different retinal eccentricities and at two different wavelengths are consistent with the model. We show that the broader multiple-entry measurements are not accounted for by cone disarray. Results of multiple-entry measurements are closer to results from measurements of the psychophysical Stiles–Crawford effect (although still narrower), and the variation with retinal eccentricity and wavelength is similar. By combining single- and multiple-entry measurements, we can estimate cone spacing. The estimates at 0- and 2-deg retinal eccentricities are in good agreement with published anatomical data.

© 1999 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(330.5310) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision - photoreceptors
(330.5370) Vision, color, and visual optics : Physiological optics

Original Manuscript: August 17, 1998
Revised Manuscript: December 14, 1998
Manuscript Accepted: December 23, 1998
Published: May 1, 1999

Susana Marcos and Stephen A. Burns, "Cone spacing and waveguide properties from cone directionality measurements," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 995-1004 (1999)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. W. S. Stiles, B. H. Crawford, “The luminous efficiency of rays entering the eye pupil at different points,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 112, 428–450 (1933). [CrossRef]
  2. J. M. Enoch, H. E. Bedell, “The Stiles–Crawford effects,” in Vertebrate Photoreceptor Optics, J. M. Enoch, F. L. Tobey, eds., Springer Series in Optical Sciences (Springer, Heidelberg, 1981).
  3. R. A. Applegate, V. Lakshminarayanan, “Parametric representation of Stiles–Crawford functions: normal variation of peak location and directionality,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 1611–1623 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. J. J. Vos, A. Huigen, “A clinical Stiles–Crawford apparatus,” Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 39, 68–76 (1962). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. F. Fankhauser, J. M. Enoch, P. Cibis, “Receptor orientation in retinal pathology,” Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 55, 807–812 (1978).
  6. V. C. Smith, J. Pokorny, K. R. Diddie, “Color matching and Stiles–Crawford effect in central serous detachment repair,” Mod. Probl. Ophthalmol. 19, 284–295 (1978).
  7. J. Pokorny, V. C. Smith, P. B. Johnston, “Photoreceptor misalignment accompanying a fibrous scar,” Arch. Ophthalmol. (Chicago) 97, 867–869 (1979). [CrossRef]
  8. C. R. Fitzgerald, D. G. Birch, J. M. Enoch, “Functional analysis of vision in patients following retinal detachment repair,” Arch. Ophthalmol. (Chicago) 98, 1237–1244 (1980). [CrossRef]
  9. G. J. van Blokland, “Directionality and alignment of the foveal photoreceptors assessed with light scattered from the human fundus in vivo,” Vision Res. 26, 495–500 (1986). [CrossRef]
  10. J. M. Gorrand, F. C. Delori, “A reflectometric technique for assessing photoreceptor alignment,” Vision Res. 35, 999–1010 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. S. A. Burns, S. Wu, F. C. Delori, A. E. Elsner, “Direct measurement of human cone-photoreceptor alignment,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 2329–2338 (1996). [CrossRef]
  12. P. J. de Lint, T. T. J. M. Berendschot, D. van Norren, “Local photoreceptor alignment measured with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope,” Vision Res. 37, 243–248 (1997). [CrossRef]
  13. S. A. Burns, A. E. Elsner, J. M. Gorrand, M. R. Kreitz, F. C. Delori, “Comparison of reflectometric and psychophysical measures of cone orientation,” in Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System, Vol. 1 of 1992 OSA Technical Digest Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1992), pp. 160–163.
  14. J. C. He, S. Marcos, S. A. Burns, “Comparison of cone directionality measured using psychophysical and reflectometric techniques,” submitted to J. Opt. Soc. Am. A.
  15. S. Marcos, S. A. Burns, J. C. He, “A model for cone directionality reflectometric measurements based on scattering,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2012–2022 (1998). [CrossRef]
  16. P. Beckmann, A. Spizzino, The Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves from Rough Surfaces (Pergamon, New York, 1963).
  17. D. I. A. MacLeod, “Directionally selective light adaptation: a visual consequence of receptor disarray?” Vision Res. 14, 369–378 (1974). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. S. A. Burns, S. Wu, J. C. He, A. E. Elsner, “Variations in photoreceptor directionality across the central retina,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2033–2040 (1997). [CrossRef]
  19. V. Lakshminarayanan, J. M. Enoch, “Shape of the Stiles–Crawford function for traverses of the entrance pupil not passing through the peak of sensitivity,” Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 62, 127–128 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. A. Safir, L. J. Hyams, “Distribution of cone orientations as an explanation of the Stiles–Crawford effect,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 757–765 (1969). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. J. M. Gorrand, F. C. Delori, “A model for assessment of cone directionality,” J. Mod. Opt. 44, 473–491 (1997). [CrossRef]
  22. G. Li, H. Zwick, R. Elliott, A. Akers, B. E. Stuck, “Mode structure alterations in normal and laser exposed vertebrate photoreceptors in the small high numerical aperture of the snake,” presented at the OSA Annual Meeting, Baltimore, Md., October 4-9, 1998.
  23. G. Westheimer, “Dependence of the magnitude of the Stiles–Crawford effect on retinal location,” J. Physiol. (London) 192, 309–315 (1967).
  24. J. M. Enoch, G. M. Hope, “Directional sensitivity of the foveal and parafoveal retina,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 12, 497–503 (1973).
  25. A. W. Snyder, C. L. Pask, “The Stiles–Crawford effect: explanation and consequences,” Vision Res. 13, 1115–1137 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. J. M. Enoch, “Optical properties of the retinal receptors,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 53, 71–85 (1963). [CrossRef]
  27. N. D. Miller, “The changes in the Stiles–Crawford effect with high luminance adapting fields,” Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 41, 599–608 (1964). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. S. J. Starr, “Effect of luminance and wavelength on the Stiles–Crawford effect in dichromats,” Ph.D. dissertation (University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill., 1977).
  29. M. J. Piket-May, A. Taflove, J. B. Troy, “Electrodynamics of visible light interactions with the vertebrate retinal rod,” Opt. Lett. 18, 568–570 (1993). [CrossRef]
  30. B. Chen, W. Makous, “Light capture by human cones,” J. Physiol. (London) 190, 583–593 (1989).
  31. C. A. Curcio, K. R. Sloan, R. E. Kalina, A. E. Hendrickson, “Human photoreceptor topography,” J. Comp. Neurol. 292, 497–523 (1992). [CrossRef]
  32. S. Marcos, R. Navarro, P. Artal, “Coherent imaging of the cone mosaic in the living human eye,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 897–905 (1996). [CrossRef]
  33. D. T. Miller, D. R. Williams, G. M. Morris, J. Liang, “Images of the cone photoreceptors in the living human eye,” Vision Res. 36, 1067–1079 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. A. R. Wade, F. W. Fitzke, “High-resolution imaging of the human cone photoreceptor mosaic using a laser scanning ophthalmoscope,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 39, 204 (1998).
  35. In de Lint et al.,12 the sampled retinal area is in fact given by the angular pixel size in the scanning laser ophthalmoscope images. However, their processing includes pixel smoothing (10×10), and final rho values are given after subsequent spatial average across the 2-deg central region.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited