OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

| OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION

  • Vol. 17, Iss. 10 — Oct. 1, 2000
  • pp: 1819–1827

Isoplanatism in a multiconjugate adaptive optics system

Andrei Tokovinin, Miska Le Louarn, and Marc Sarazin  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA A, Vol. 17, Issue 10, pp. 1819-1827 (2000)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.17.001819


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (186 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Turbulence correction in a large field of view by use of an adaptive optics imaging system with several deformable mirrors (DM’s) conjugated to various heights is considered. The residual phase variance is computed for an optimized linear algorithm in which a correction of each turbulent layer is achieved by applying a combination of suitably smoothed and scaled input phase screens to all DM’s. Finite turbulence outer scale and finite spatial resolution of the DM’s are taken into account. A general expression for the isoplanatic angle θM of a system with M mirrors is derived in the limiting case of infinitely large apertures and Kolmogorov turbulence. Like Fried’s isoplanatic angle θ0, θM is a function only of the turbulence vertical profile, is scalable with wavelength, and is independent of the telescope diameter. Use of angle θM permits the gain in the field of view due to the increased number of DM’s to be quantified and their optimal conjugate heights to be found. Calculations with real turbulence profiles show that with three DM’s a gain of 7–10× is possible, giving the typical and best isoplanatic field-of-view radii of 16 and 30 arcseconds, respectively, at λ=0.5 μm. It is shown that in the actual systems the isoplanatic field will be somewhat larger than θM owing to the combined effects of finite aperture diameter, finite outer scale, and optimized wave-front spatial filtering. However, this additional gain is not dramatic; it is less than 1.5× for large-aperture telescopes.

© 2000 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.0010) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Atmospheric and oceanic optics
(010.1080) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Active or adaptive optics
(010.1330) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Atmospheric turbulence

Citation
Andrei Tokovinin, Miska Le Louarn, and Marc Sarazin, "Isoplanatism in a multiconjugate adaptive optics system," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 1819-1827 (2000)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-17-10-1819


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. D. C. Johnston and B. M. Welsh, “Analysis of multiconjugate adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 394–408 (1994).
  2. B. Ellerbroek, “First-order performance evaluation of adaptive optics systems for atmospheric turbulence compensa-tion in extended field of view astronomical telescopes,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 783–805 (1994).
  3. T. Fusco, J.-M. Conan, V. Michau, L. M. Mugnier, and G. Rousset, “Phase estimation for large field of view: application to multiconjugate adaptive optics,” in Propagation through the Atmosphere III, M. C. Roggemann and L. R. Bissonnette, eds, Proc. SPIE 3763, 125–133 (1999).
  4. J. Yan, R. Zhou, and X. Yu, “Problems with multiconjugate correction,” Opt. Eng. 33, 2942–2944 (1994).
  5. M. Tallon and R. Foy, “Adaptive telescope with laser probe—isoplanatism and cone effect,” Astron. Astrophys. 235, 549–557 (1990).
  6. D. Fried, “Anisoplanatism in adaptive optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 52–61 (1982).
  7. J. Stone, P. H. Hu, S. P. Mills, and S. Ma, “Anisoplanatic effects in finite-aperture optical systems,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 347–357 (1994).
  8. F. Chassat, “Calcul du domaine d’isoplanétisme d’un systéme d’optique adaptative fonctionnant à travers la turbulence atmosphérique,” J. Opt. (Paris) 20, 13–23 (1989).
  9. M. Chun, “The useful field of view of an adaptive optics system,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 110, 317–329 (1998).
  10. M. C. Roggemann and B. Welsh, Imaging through Turbulence (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. 1996).
  11. F. Roddier, “The effects of atmospheric turbulence in optical astronomy,” in Progress in Optics, E. Wolf, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981), Vol. XIX, pp. 281–376.
  12. G. C. Valley and S. M. Wandzura, “Spatial correlation of phase-expansion coefficients for propagation through atmospheric turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 712–717 (1979).
  13. A. Fuchs and J. Vernin, “Final report on PARSCA 1992 and 1993 campaigns,” ESO Tech. Rep. VLT-TRE-UNI-17400–0001 (European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany, 1996).
  14. M. Sarazin, in OSA/ESO Topical Meeting on Adaptive Optics, M. Cullum, ed. (European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany, 1996), pp. 439–444.
  15. F. Martin, A. Tokovinin, A. Ziad, R. Conan, J. Borgnino, R. Avila, A. Agabi, and M. Sarazin, “First statistical data on the wavefront outer scale at La Silla Observatory,” Astron. Astrophys. 336, L49–L52 (1998).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited